2025-26 Season
COLLIN GILLESPIE
2025-26 Season
COLLIN GILLESPIE
Gillespie produces at an above average rate for a 28-minute workload.
Gillespie produces at an above average rate for a 28-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 16 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Collin Gillespie spent the first two months of the 2025-26 campaign forcing his way out of a crowded rotation and into a full-time starting gig. He initially carved out minutes as a sparkplug distributor off the bench. On 10/27 vs UTA, he tallied 15 points and 13 assists to post a +3.2 Impact score, generating crucial playmaking value to offset a rough 5-for-13 shooting night. There were certainly growing pains when his jumper evaporated entirely. During an ugly outing on 11/07 vs LAC, Gillespie threw up a brutal 0-for-5 donut from the field. This dragged his Impact down to -6.2, as his seven assists simply could not rescue a shift defined by a total lack of scoring gravity. However, a late-November promotion to the starting five ultimately unlocked his ceiling as a perimeter threat. That offensive leap peaked on 12/02 vs LAL when he erupted for 28 points and a massive +24.8 Impact score, burying the defense with an 8-for-14 barrage from beyond the arc.
Collin Gillespie’s midseason run was defined by extreme perimeter volatility, oscillating wildly between game-breaking sniper and ice-cold liability. When his jumper fell, he was an utterly lethal offensive engine. He peaked on 02/03 vs POR, torching the nets for 30 points and 10 assists on eight made threes to generate a massive +27.4 impact score. Yet even when his shooting completely vanished, he occasionally found ways to survive on the margins. During a brutal 0-for-6 shooting night on 01/12 vs WAS, Gillespie still managed to scrape out a +0.9 impact score by pivoting to a facilitator role, grabbing six rebounds and dishing five assists to keep the offense moving despite his broken jumper. Unfortunately, that scrappy utility didn't always save him from his own cold streaks. He closed this stretch mired in a brutal slump, posting a -4.6 impact on 02/19 vs SAS as he bricked 10 of his 13 attempts and stalled possessions with forced, contested looks.
Collin Gillespie’s late-season run was defined by wild, unpredictable swings between offensive brilliance and absolute shooting disasters that eventually cost him his starting job. When his jumper was falling, he looked like a highly capable floor general. He dropped 24 points on six made threes during the 03/19 vs SAS matchup, generating a massive +23.2 impact score through pure shot-making. He didn't always need a barrage of points to swing a game, either. During the 03/10 vs MIL contest, Gillespie posted a stellar +13.4 impact score despite scoring just 12 points, using aggressive rebounding and nine assists to completely control the tempo and create value without scoring. But his cold streaks were brutal enough to sink the offense entirely. He suffered an abysmal -14.7 impact score on 03/29 vs UTA after bricking all eight of his three-point attempts, offering zero gravity to space the floor for his teammates. Those frequent offensive disappearances ultimately forced the coaching staff to pull him from the starting lineup in early April, relegating him to a quiet bench role to close out the year.
A brutal, prolonged shooting slump defined Collin Gillespie's late-season stretch, eventually forcing his demotion to the bench. His perimeter inefficiency reached a terrifying nadir on Mar 29 vs UTA. During that catastrophic outing, an 0-for-8 nightmare from deep completely derailed the offense and earned him a disastrous -17.5 impact score. Even when his shot actually fell, hidden costs often dragged him into the red. He poured in 24 points on Mar 08 vs CHA, yet still posted a -1.8 impact score because his lackluster defensive metrics erased his scoring contributions. However, Gillespie occasionally managed to salvage his floor time through sheer grit. On Apr 10 vs LAL, he logged a +5.0 impact score despite scoring just five points, relying entirely on steady defensive positioning and high-level hustle plays to generate value. Ultimately, no amount of scrappy loose-ball recoveries could mask the fact that his erratic shot selection actively harmed the team's spacing.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Volatile for his role. Gillespie has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.
Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 38% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.
Defensive difference-maker. Gillespie consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +6.3, second-half: +2.8. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 11 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
86 games played