GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 36.4m
31
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.9

A surprising -3.9 overall impact indicates that his scoring came at the expense of defensive integrity or overall lineup synergy. While he hit his mid-range spots effectively, the team consistently lost his minutes due to off-ball defensive lapses.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 10/15 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 60.5%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +23.2
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +5.4
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -13.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 68.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S Grayson Allen 35.6m
18
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+4.7

Despite solid shooting efficiency, his negative impact score suggests he was targeted defensively or struggled within the team's broader lineup combinations. The offense flowed well when he shot, but defensive breakdowns during his shifts proved costly.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -0.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Dillon Brooks 33.9m
22
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.2

A disastrous showing from beyond the arc dragged his overall impact deep into the red despite a high scoring output. The sheer volume of wasted perimeter possessions outweighed his rugged defensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 9/24 (37.5%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.4%
USG% 28.7%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ryan Dunn 24.7m
9
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.0

Elite defensive instincts and relentless glass-cleaning anchored a massive +8.5 net impact. He completely disrupted the opponent's offensive flow while converting enough timely looks to punish defensive sagging.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -11.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
S Oso Ighodaro 19.4m
7
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.9

Defensive lapses and an inability to protect the rim neutralized his otherwise efficient interior finishing. Opponents successfully targeted him in pick-and-roll coverage, bleeding points that erased his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.7

Solid 3-and-D execution wasn't quite enough to push his net impact into the green. He played his role perfectly by spacing the floor and defending the wing, but was likely dragged down by broader rotational struggles during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
11
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.6

Strong rim protection was nearly enough to balance out a lack of offensive involvement. He controlled the defensive glass but failed to generate the vertical spacing and lob threats he usually provides.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 9.7%
Net Rtg +16.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +13.0
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
7
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.3

Inefficient perimeter execution kept his impact slightly below water. He struggled to break down his primary defender, leading to contested jumpers that bailed out the opposing defense.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +20.9
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.5

A complete lack of offensive production during his brief rotation turn resulted in a heavily negative impact. He was virtually invisible on the offensive end, failing to apply any pressure on the defense.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.3%
Net Rtg +14.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Absolute domination in a micro-stint produced a staggering +8.4 impact in under five minutes. He capitalized on every single touch around the basket, overwhelming the opposing second unit with pure physicality.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.1%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -45.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAC Sacramento Kings
S DeMar DeRozan 37.4m
29
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
+29.0

A massive +13.3 overall impact was driven by surgical shot selection and elite offensive efficiency. He hunted high-percentage looks to easily eclipse his recent scoring averages, while providing surprisingly stout defensive value on the other end.

Shooting
FG 12/17 (70.6%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/9 (44.4%)
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring +23.0
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +4.7
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S Zach LaVine 34.5m
30
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.6

Empty-calorie scoring defined this outing, as a high volume of errant three-point attempts tanked his overall net impact. The sheer number of perimeter bricks negated his ability to get to his spots inside the arc, leaving his overall efficiency severely compromised.

Shooting
FG 13/24 (54.2%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 59.2%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg -7.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
-2.9

Relentless energy plays and disruptive point-of-attack defense allowed him to post a positive net rating. He doubled his recent scoring average by finding driving lanes in transition, offsetting any half-court stagnation.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -10.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Nique Clifford 23.7m
2
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.4

Despite solid defensive and hustle metrics keeping him afloat, a severe lack of offensive aggression dragged his overall impact into the negative. He vanished from the scoring column compared to recent outings, failing to pressure the rim or create advantages.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg +8.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.3
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S Drew Eubanks 21.9m
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

Defensive anchoring completely salvaged an otherwise quiet offensive stint. His massive +13.0 defensive impact score indicates he effectively walled off the paint and deterred drives, even as his own finishing around the basket sputtered.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense +5.1
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 2
Malik Monk 27.4m
19
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.7

Lethal perimeter shot-making and high-motor activity fueled a stellar +7.8 overall impact. He capitalized on defensive rotations with quick-trigger triples, serving as the ultimate offensive sparkplug off the bench.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.4%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg -16.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.2

Errant shot selection and forced attempts at the rim resulted in a damaging -7.2 overall impact. While he brought his trademark defensive intensity, the wasted offensive possessions severely hampered the team's half-court execution.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 32.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +5.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.1

Clunky finishing around the basket undermined an otherwise passable defensive shift. Missing easily convertible looks inside prevented him from capitalizing on his size advantages in the paint.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.6m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Keon Ellis 13.0m
9
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.0

Hyper-efficient opportunistic scoring drove a highly positive impact in limited action. He took exactly what the defense gave him without forcing the issue, maximizing his value as a low-usage, high-yield floor spacer.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -12.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.7

A complete offensive disappearing act torpedoed his impact score after a string of highly efficient performances. He failed to establish any interior position or command the ball, rendering him a non-factor during his brief time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg -8.2
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Unable to find the rhythm of the game during a short stint, his negative impact stemmed from empty offensive possessions. He failed to stretch the floor or connect on his limited looks, making it hard to justify extended minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0