2025-26 Season
TOUMANI CAMARA
2025-26 Season
TOUMANI CAMARA
Camara produces at an average rate for a 33-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
A maddening tug-of-war between relentless defensive energy and destructive shot selection completely defined Toumani Camara's first twenty games. When he embraced his role as a gritty connector, the results were stellar. Look at his performance vs MIN on 10/22, where a quiet 10-point outing still yielded a +5.2 impact score because he suffocated opposing ball-handlers and generated crucial extra possessions. Too often, however, Camara hijacked the offense with ill-advised perimeter barrages that actively harmed his team. During a rough outing vs MIA on 11/08, he launched 13 three-pointers, making just three, which cratered his overall value to a brutal -15.3 impact score despite his usual high-motor rebounding. Even when his shots actually fell, hidden costs sometimes ruined his night. He dropped a solid 16 points vs HOU on 11/14, yet posted an abysmal -16.6 impact score because poorly timed fouls and defensive breakdowns gave away every bit of value he created on the offensive end. If Camara wants to stay on the floor, he must stop forcing the issue and get back to starring in his role.
A maddening inconsistency defined Toumani Camara’s midseason stretch. Volatile shot selection and hidden defensive costs frequently sabotaged his overall effectiveness. Take the 12/26 vs LAC matchup as a prime example of this hollow production. He poured in 20 points but registered a dismal -14.3 impact score because he stubbornly chucked high-volume attempts from beyond the arc. He repeated this frustrating pattern on 01/03 vs SAS. Despite dropping another 20 points, he posted a -6.3 impact mark because poor transition defense and costly mistakes entirely wiped out his blistering perimeter efficiency. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without relying on his jumper. On 01/07 vs HOU, he scored a modest 14 points but earned a +3.2 impact score through pure effort and game-changing hustle plays.
Toumani Camara’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, swinging wildly between flawless offensive execution and outright self-sabotage. He reached his absolute ceiling on 02/09 vs PHI, pouring in 30 points on 8-of-10 shooting from deep to post a monstrous +21.7 impact score. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he could still generate positive value through sheer hustle. During his 02/07 vs MEM appearance, he managed just 8 points on a brutal 3-for-10 from the field, yet earned a +2.5 impact mark by transforming into a menace on the offensive glass. However, hidden costs frequently dragged down his seemingly productive nights. Look at his outing on 01/27 vs WAS. A solid 16-point, nine-rebound line masked a -1.2 impact score driven entirely by severe ball security issues and costly defensive fouls. When Camara plays within himself, he is a devastating two-way weapon, but his erratic decision-making remains a glaring hurdle.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Boom-or-bust player. Camara's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Camara consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -1.6, second-half: +1.0. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
78 games played