GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
25
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+14.1

Bricking a massive volume of shots and failing to connect from beyond the arc, he fell into a rare pattern of offensive inefficiency. Despite a massive baseline box score (+20.9), his overall Impact (+11.8) was significantly suppressed by severe miss penalties. However, his elite creation value and foul-drawing ability kept his overall footprint highly positive despite the shooting struggles.

Shooting
FG 5/18 (27.8%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 15/17 (88.2%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +4.0
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
S Jalen Williams 29.1m
22
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+23.8

Operating as an unstoppable offensive connector inside the arc, he settled into a familiar pattern of converting the vast majority of his looks. A highly efficient scoring night drove a massive Impact score (+14.6), bolstered by strong defensive metrics (+4.0) and excellent creation value. His ability to generate high-quality offense without turning the ball over maximized his overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +4.3
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +5.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Chet Holmgren 24.8m
16
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+17.3

Continuing his late-season pattern of terrorizing opponents on both ends, he completely locked down the paint while scoring efficiently. Elite two-way dominance fueled a stellar Impact score (+11.5), anchored by a massive defensive credit (+7.2) and highly efficient shot-making. His ability to generate scoring value without demanding high usage perfectly optimized his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +12.1
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +5.0
Defense +5.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 23.7m
8
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Falling back into a familiar pattern of offensive slumps that neutralize his physical hustle, he missed the majority of his perimeter looks. A brutal shooting night dragged his overall Impact (-2.3) into the red, completely erasing a positive defensive credit (+1.4). The difficulty-adjusted miss penalties from his erratic shooting heavily outweighed his baseline contributions.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.6

Breaking his recent pattern of offensive passivity, he converted all of his attempts to generate maximum shot-making value without any miss penalties. A flawless shooting performance and relentless rebounding translated into a highly positive Impact score (+5.1). His ability to dominate the interior without requiring heavy usage perfectly complemented the primary scorers.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +9.2
Defense -1.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
9
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.0

Perfectly embodying his midseason pattern of acting as a lethal bench sparkplug, he buried his attempts from deep to generate significant shot-making value. A massive defensive credit (+4.5) and highly efficient perimeter shooting drove a strong Impact score (+7.2). His ability to blend disruptive defense with low-mistake creation maximized his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.7

Settling into a familiar pattern of grinding, low-mistake utility, he converted his looks while avoiding costly turnovers. Efficient interior finishing and solid defensive metrics (+2.2) combined to produce a positive Impact score (+2.6). His ability to generate positive value without demanding the ball perfectly suited his role as a connector.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.1
Defense +3.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 20.1m
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.5

Missing a high volume of perimeter attempts to rack up significant miss penalties, he fell into a familiar pattern of erratic microwave scoring. A volatile shooting night resulted in a slightly negative Impact score (-0.6), despite positive defensive contributions (+1.4). The negative value from his missed triples ultimately canceled out the creation and spacing he provided.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Alex Caruso 13.3m
2
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.6

Continuing a midseason pattern of severe shooting slumps that limit his overall utility, he missed the majority of his looks. A lack of offensive production and negative defensive metrics (-0.6) resulted in a poor Impact score (-2.0). Without his usual game-tilting defensive disruptions, his quiet scoring night became a glaring liability.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.3m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.6

Mirroring his early-season pattern of struggling to stretch the floor, he missed the bulk of his perimeter attempts. However, an overwhelming defensive credit (+9.7) completely rescued his Impact score (+5.6) on a night where his shot wasn't falling. His elite positioning and defensive execution entirely masked the penalties from his offensive inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +9.5
Turnovers -5.4
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

Continuing a late-season pattern of hollow, empty-calorie minutes, he missed the majority of his shots and failed to generate any creation value. Negative defensive metrics (-1.5) and offensive inefficiency dragged his Impact score (-2.0) into the red. Without high-leverage shot-making to fall back on, his struggles to adapt to the professional pace were glaring.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.5m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Falling into a familiar pattern of invisible bench minutes where his passivity hurts the team's spacing, he failed to generate meaningful scoring or creation value. A quiet offensive showing resulted in a negative Impact score (-1.5). A slightly positive defensive credit (+0.3) wasn't enough to offset his lack of offensive gravity.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.7

Mirroring his late-season pattern of offensive struggles, he missed his perimeter looks and failed to generate significant creation value. A positive baseline box score (+3.3) was heavily suppressed by poor shooting, resulting in a muted Impact score (+1.2). However, his defensive execution (+0.6) and low-mistake utility kept his overall footprint slightly above water.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.1

Failing to attempt a single shot, this passive performance perfectly illustrated a pattern of offensive hesitancy where his inability to pressure the rim neutralizes his playmaking value. A completely scoreless outing resulted in a negative Impact score (-1.0). Without any scoring gravity or defensive contributions, his brief rotation stint was a net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 33.1m
23
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.2

Grinding, high-usage volume defined this performance, as he fell into a familiar pattern of struggling to find his rhythm from beyond the arc. A dominant baseline box score (+15.4) was heavily suppressed by negative defensive metrics (-2.4) and inefficiency penalties, resulting in a muted overall Impact (+1.2). While his playmaking and scoring gravity kept the offense afloat, the difficulty-adjusted deductions capped his ceiling.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Dillon Brooks 32.3m
18
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.7

Steep penalties from a barrage of errant field goals dragged his Impact score deep into the red (-9.8), completely tanking his overall value. This performance perfectly mirrored his midseason pattern of unapologetic, inefficient gunning that stalls out the offense. Even with a positive baseline box score (+2.6), his inability to convert difficult looks erased any peripheral contributions.

Shooting
FG 6/22 (27.3%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.3m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Green 31.5m
17
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.7

A brutal shooting night triggered severe miss penalties, completely neutralizing the value of his scoring output. His negative overall Impact (-4.0) stands in stark contrast to his positive defensive credit (+4.0), exposing a highly inefficient offensive showing. This hollow volume perfectly illustrates his late-season pattern of erratic shot selection stalling out the offense.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Oso Ighodaro 25.9m
0
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.0

Relentless activity on the glass and solid connectivity allowed him to salvage a respectable baseline box score (+6.0) despite going scoreless. However, his overall Impact (-4.8) was dragged down by negative defensive metrics (-1.6) and a total lack of scoring gravity. This outing reflects a recurring pattern where his value plummets when he cannot leverage his hyper-efficient interior finishing.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring -3.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +11.4
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.4

Falling back into a pattern of offensive hesitation, he barely looked at the rim and failed to generate any creation credit. This quiet night offensively resulted in a negative Impact score (-3.9), primarily driven by a lack of shot-making and negative defensive value (-1.5). Without his usual chaotic energy on the glass or as a distributor, his overall footprint on the game was minimal.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Ryan Dunn 24.6m
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.4

Missing all of his attempts from the field, he fell back into a midseason pattern of being a massive liability who allows defenses to completely ignore him. This absolute offensive zero resulted in a catastrophic Impact score (-16.0) driven by severe miss penalties. While he offered a sliver of defensive value (+0.8), his total lack of scoring or creation completely torpedoed his team's spacing.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
8
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

His perimeter volatility flared up once again, leading to a familiar pattern of offensive hesitancy that limited his creation value and scoring output. Solid defensive metrics (+2.1) could not rescue his overall Impact (-3.5) on a night where his shot wasn't falling. A lack of high-leverage shot-making ultimately outweighed his positive contributions on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -35
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.3

Taking a minimal number of shots, he fell into a familiar pattern of offensive passivity that neutralized his value as a floor-spacer. Despite a positive baseline box score (+4.1), his overall Impact (-3.7) was dragged into the red by a lack of offensive volume and creation. His minimal defensive contributions (+0.3) simply couldn't compensate for a near-total absence of scoring gravity.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Struggling to survive the professional pace during deep-bench minutes, he mirrored his early-season pattern of empty-cardio irrelevance. A scoreless stint resulted in a heavily penalized Impact score (-7.0), driven by a complete lack of offensive production. Without any meaningful rim protection or hustle value to fall back on, his rotation stint was a net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.2

Settling into a pattern of low-usage connectivity rather than hunting his own offense, he made his mark entirely on the other end of the floor. He managed to scrape together a positive Impact score (+2.8) driven by disruptive defensive metrics (+2.9) rather than offensive output. His ability to generate defensive stops completely masked a quiet scoring night.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.1

Maximizing his limited minutes with perfect execution, he broke his recent pattern of offensive hesitancy to provide a massive scoring punch. A flawless shooting display fueled a highly efficient Impact score (+6.3), as he buried all of his perimeter attempts. This hyper-efficient shot-making bonus completely drove his value, requiring zero defensive or hustle contributions to make a positive mark.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.6m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.0

Failing to register a single point, his completely invisible offensive performance tanked his Impact score (-4.3). This outing perfectly encapsulated his recent pattern of bleeding value through offensive hesitancy and empty cardio minutes. Even a slightly positive defensive credit (+0.3) wasn't enough to offset his total lack of scoring or creation.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.1

Failing to record a single counting stat, his negative Impact score (-3.5) was the direct result of logging pure empty cardio. This invisible stint perfectly mirrored his early-season pattern of bleeding value while marooned at the end of the rotation. Without any shot attempts or defensive plays, his presence on the floor was entirely negligible.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1