SAC

2025-26 Season

RUSSELL WESTBROOK

Sacramento Kings | Guard | 6-4
Russell Westbrook
15.2 PPG
5.4 RPG
6.7 APG
28.9 MPG
-3.3 Impact

Westbrook produces at an below average rate for a 29-minute workload. 3.3 turnovers per game cost 6.4 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.3
Scoring +8.1
Points 15.2 PPG × +1.00 = +15.2
Missed 2PT 3.6/g × -0.78 = -2.8
Missed 3PT 3.9/g × -0.87 = -3.4
Missed FT 0.9/g × -1.00 = -0.9
Creation +5.2
Assists 6.7/g × +0.50 = +3.4
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -6.4
Turnovers 3.3/g × -1.95 = -6.4
Defense +2.5
Steals 1.3/g × +2.30 = +3.0
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 4.1/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Contested Shots 1.7/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 2.1/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +11.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.0
Net Impact
-3.3
19th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 77th
15.2 PPG
Efficiency 31th
52.0% TS
Playmaking 93th
6.7 APG
Rebounding 93th
5.4 RPG
Rim Protection 62th
0.13/min
Hustle 19th
0.08/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 2th
0.11/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Russell Westbrook's opening stretch of the season was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between brilliant, vintage aggression and self-destructive decision-making. When he harnessed that erratic energy, he was utterly dominant. Look no further than 11/05 vs GSW, where an absolute masterclass in defensive rebounding and efficiency yielded 23 points, 16 boards, and a towering +15.3 impact score. However, his high-scoring nights frequently carried steep hidden costs. On 11/07 vs OKC, Westbrook poured in 24 points on scorching 5-for-9 perimeter shooting, yet he still dragged the team down with a -4.8 impact. That negative mark perfectly captures the Westbrook experience, as reckless defensive gambles and live-ball turnovers completely erased his offensive production. Conversely, he managed to grind out a +4.2 impact during a low-scoring effort on 11/11 vs DEN, finishing with just 14 points on a miserable 3-for-12 shooting night. Rather than letting a broken jumper ruin his floor game, he generated winning margins through 11 assists, relentless hustle, and timely defensive rotations.

This stretch of the season was defined by absolute chaos, oscillating wildly between vintage rim-pressure and destructive, high-variance decision-making. He looked brilliant during a massive +10.8 impact performance on 12/08 vs IND, racking up 24 points, 12 rebounds, and 14 assists through relentless downhill attacks. But those fleeting moments of glory were routinely buried under an avalanche of errant perimeter jumpers. Look no further than the 01/12 vs LAL matchup. Westbrook poured in 22 points and dished 7 assists, yet posted a miserable -7.1 impact score because the hidden costs of live-ball mistakes and erratic choices bled away all offensive efficiency. The floor completely collapsed on 01/01 vs BOS, where a disastrous 3-for-11 shooting night and glaring defensive lapses saddled him with a brutal -14.2 impact score. While he can still occasionally catch fire from deep, the sheer recklessness of his current playstyle simply punishes his own team too often.

This midseason stretch was defined by a maddening slump of reckless shot selection and chaotic decision-making that consistently sabotaged his own team's offense. Westbrook frequently played himself right out of positive value, settling for low-percentage jumpers instead of leveraging his physical gifts. Look no further than 02/07 vs CLE, where he tallied 21 points, 5 rebounds, and 9 assists. Despite a hot shooting night from deep, catastrophic decision-making and live-ball turnovers dragged his impact down to a brutal -14.1. He occasionally found the right balance, like on 03/08 vs CHI when relentless downhill aggression generated high-value kickouts, yielding 23 points, 11 rebounds, 12 assists, and a massive +13.5 impact score. Yet, the bad habits always returned. During 03/14 vs LAC, he racked up 12 points, 12 rebounds, and 10 assists, but still posted a -3.2 impact because his dismal 4-for-15 shooting completely negated his elite defensive rebounding metrics. He remains a high-motor force, but the hidden costs of his erratic perimeter chucking make him a glaring half-court liability.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Westbrook has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Westbrook consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -2.2, second-half: -4.3. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 64 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Gillespie 67.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
A. Thompson 66.4 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
K. Dunn 63.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
C. Johnson 58.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
D. Fox 54.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
A. Thompson 53.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.26
PTS 14
S. Sharpe 51.7 poss
FG% 72.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 18
FG% 45.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
B. Mathurin 45.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
D. DiVincenzo 39.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 65.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 14
FG% 66.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
A. Thompson 60.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 16
A. Edwards 55.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 12
C. Cunningham 51.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
A. Gordon 50.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
S. Sharpe 49.6 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
K. Dunn 49.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
C. Gillespie 47.0 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
K. Towns 46.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

64
Games
15.2
PPG
5.4
RPG
6.7
APG
1.3
SPG
0.2
BPG
42.7
FG%
33.8
3P%
69.4
FT%
28.9
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played