PHX

2025-26 Season

KHAMAN MALUACH

Phoenix Suns | Center | 7-1
Khaman Maluach
2.7 PPG
2.4 RPG
0.1 APG
8.2 MPG
+0.8 Impact

Maluach produces at an average rate for a 8-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.8
Scoring +1.7
Points 2.7 PPG × +1.00 = +2.7
Missed 2PT 0.6/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 0.3/g × -0.87 = -0.3
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +0.9
Assists 0.1/g × +0.50 = +0.1
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense -0.6
Steals 0.1/g × +2.30 = +0.2
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 1.8/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Contested Shots 3.3/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 0.3/g × +0.65 = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.7/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +2.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −1.3
Net Impact
+0.8
18th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 10th
4.3 PPG
Efficiency 42th
57.8% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.2 APG
Rebounding 18th
4.0 RPG
Rim Protection 95th
0.27/min
Hustle 51th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 22th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Khaman Maluach’s first twenty games were defined by erratic, blink-and-you-miss-it garbage time minutes where his defensive awareness wildly fluctuated. When given a season-high 13 minutes on 10/25 vs DEN, he managed to score 6 points but posted a brutal -6.7 impact score. That dismal rating stemmed directly from his inability to anchor the paint, as poor pick-and-roll positioning heavily compromised his defensive value and bled points on the other end. Conversely, he flipped the script on 01/02 vs SAC, generating a massive +6.6 impact score despite scoring just 4 points. He maximized that brief five-minute run by providing instant, suffocating rim protection. Too often, however, these short appearances ended in disaster. Look no further than his -5.0 impact mark on 11/10 vs NOP, where he looked completely out of sync, missed rotations, and clogged the floor. Until the rookie learns to consistently process defensive coverages, he will remain glued to the end of the bench.

Khaman Maluach spent this stretch morphing into a terrifying, high-leverage defensive specialist who could completely hijack a game in just a handful of minutes. He operates as pure chaos off the bench, swinging wildly between unplayable mistakes and absolute rim-protecting dominance. Look at his disastrous outing on 03/05 vs CHI, where he posted a brutal -6.1 impact score; severe struggles with defensive rotations and positioning bled points despite him grabbing four rebounds. Yet, he flipped the script immediately the next night on 03/06 vs NOP. He scored just 4 points in 20 minutes, but generated a massive +7.0 impact score by completely altering the geometry of the court with a monstrous defensive performance that erased driving lanes. When the offensive touches actually align with his defensive instincts, the results are staggering. He dismantled the opposition on 03/28 vs UTA, racking up 12 points and 9 rebounds to drive a colossal +13.0 impact score purely by acting as an impenetrable rim deterrent.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Maluach's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~3 points per game.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Maluach locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -1.0, second-half: +2.7. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Kalkbrenner 24.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
N. Jokić 24.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
M. Turner 23.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 8
J. Williams 23.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 8
Y. Missi 22.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Sims 17.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Gobert 16.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
Y. Niederhäuser 15.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1
J. Mashack 14.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
J. Huff 14.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Kalkbrenner 26.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
N. Jokić 23.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 8
Y. Missi 23.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
M. Turner 22.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
J. Williams 21.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Sims 18.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Gobert 17.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Tshiebwe 17.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
K. Filipowski 15.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
J. Huff 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

42
Games
2.7
PPG
2.4
RPG
0.1
APG
0.1
SPG
0.7
BPG
53.7
FG%
20.0
3P%
71.0
FT%
8.2
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played