PHX

2025-26 Season

KHAMAN MALUACH

Phoenix Suns | Center | 7-1
Khaman Maluach
2.9PPG
2.8RPG
0.1APG
9.0MPG
-5.5 Impact

Maluach produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.5
Scoring +2.6
Points Scored 2.9 PPG = +2.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.4
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.1 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.5/g (live + dead blend) = -1.6
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.1/g = +0.2
Blocks 0.6/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.1
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 2.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.4
Contested Shots 2.7/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.2/g = +0.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.1/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 0.6/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +4.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5
Net Impact
-5.5
10th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 13th
4.4 PPG
Efficiency 35th
57.1% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.1 APG
Rebounding 24th
4.4 RPG
Defense 7th
+2.4/g
Hustle 54th
+17.8/g
Creation 4th
+0.90/g
Shot Making 50th
+4.58/g
TO Discipline 31th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Khaman Maluach's first 16 games of the 2025-26 season were defined by the harsh reality of life at the end of an NBA bench. During a brief window of extended run on 10/25 vs DEN, he managed six points and two rebounds in 13 minutes, yet still posted a -5.7 Impact score due to empty floor time and poor defensive rotations. His struggles to positively influence the game in short bursts were glaringly obvious on 11/11 vs NOP. In just four minutes of action, he missed his only shot and recorded a dismal -14.5 Impact score, dragged down by an absolute lack of offensive gravity and wasted possessions. Even when he converted his looks, such as going 2-for-2 from the field for four points on 01/03 vs SAC, the underlying metrics refused to flip positive. That outing still yielded a -3.7 Impact score, revealing the hidden costs of a raw big man who simply occupies space rather than actively dictating the flow of the game. Right now, he is merely surviving on garbage-time scraps.

Khaman Maluach’s midseason stretch was defined by a jarring promotion from garbage-time afterthought to chaotic rotation experiment. After weeks of tallying empty cardio, he finally earned a real look on 02/11 vs OKC. His aggressive work on the glass and efficient finishing in that contest translated to a +3.6 Impact score. But trusting a raw big man with extended run guarantees wild growing pains. Look no further than 03/10 vs MIL. He dropped a stretch-high eight points, yet crippled his unit with a -7.0 Impact because he failed to grab a single rebound in 15 minutes of action. Even when he avoided missing shots, his sheer lack of spatial awareness could torpedo a lineup, yielding a disastrous -15.5 Impact on 03/05 vs CHI despite making his lone field goal attempt. Maluach clearly has the physical tools to survive, but right now, putting him on the floor is a massive gamble.

Khaman Maluach’s late-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between deep-bench irrelevance and dominant flashes on the glass. Earning a rare start during the 04/08 vs DAL matchup, the big man only managed four points but still generated a massive +8.2 Impact score. That lofty rating stemmed entirely from his sheer willpower in the paint, as he vacuumed up 14 rebounds and created crucial extra possessions through relentless hustle. He followed that up just a few days later with an absolute masterclass during the 04/12 vs OKC contest. Logging 29 minutes off the bench, Maluach exploded for 18 points and 14 boards, driving a staggering +14.9 Impact score by pairing his usual rebounding dominance with highly efficient shot selection. Yet, his floor time remained incredibly fickle. During the 03/24 vs DEN game, he was practically played off the court in just 11 minutes, posting a dismal -9.8 Impact score because he grabbed a single rebound and offered terrible defensive resistance inside.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Maluach has posted negative impact in 84% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Maluach locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -6.8, second-half: -4.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 5 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Kalkbrenner 24.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
N. Jokić 24.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
M. Turner 23.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 8
J. Williams 23.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 8
Y. Missi 22.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Sims 17.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Gobert 16.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
Y. Niederhäuser 15.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1
J. Mashack 14.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
J. Huff 14.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Kalkbrenner 26.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
N. Jokić 23.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 8
Y. Missi 23.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
M. Turner 22.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
J. Williams 21.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Sims 18.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Gobert 17.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Tshiebwe 17.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
K. Filipowski 15.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
J. Huff 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

51
Games
2.9
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.1
APG
0.1
SPG
0.6
BPG
52.6
FG%
21.7
3P%
71.0
FT%
9.0
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played