NYK

2025-26 Season

MILES MCBRIDE

New York Knicks | Guard | 6-2
Miles McBride
11.1PPG
2.2RPG
2.3APG
25.2MPG
+0.8 Impact

McBride produces at an average rate for a 25-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.8
Scoring +10.1
Points Scored 11.1 PPG = +11.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.1
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 2.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense +0.3
Steals 0.8/g = +1.8
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.7
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Rebounds 2.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.2
Contested Shots 3.2/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.3/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.3/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +10.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.8
Net Impact
+0.8
64th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 60th
11.1 PPG
Efficiency 47th
54.2% TS
Playmaking 42th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 24th
2.2 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 27th
+6.7/g
Creation 13th
+1.54/g
Shot Making 62th
+7.44/g
TO Discipline 84th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Miles McBride’s early season was defined by a chaotic tug-of-war between his lethal perimeter shooting and erratic offensive volume as he bounced between the bench and the starting lineup. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, like on 10/24 vs BOS, he managed to grind out a +3.1 impact score despite scoring just 10 points on a dismal 3-for-11 from the field. That positive mark stemmed entirely from his relentless defensive pressure and hustle plays, keeping him valuable on a night where his offensive execution faltered. He finally found his aggressive scoring edge as a starter on 11/18 vs MIA, pouring in 25 points on a whopping 23 shot attempts to generate a robust +8.9 impact. But his absolute peak arrived on 11/27 vs CHA. Operating with ruthless efficiency, McBride buried all five of his three-point attempts to score 19 points, yielding a massive +12.4 impact score driven by flawless shot selection and suffocating point-of-attack defense. When he avoids forcing bad shots and lets his defensive intensity dictate his rhythm, he transforms into an indispensable two-way weapon.

A volatile tug-of-war between his starting role and bench duties defined this erratic mid-season stretch for Miles McBride. When his perimeter jumper caught fire, he was a massive net positive for the rotation. Look no further than 12/06 vs UTA, where he torched the nets for 22 points on 7-of-10 shooting from deep to post a stellar +13.9 Impact. However, his heavy reliance on the three-ball meant that when the shots stopped falling, his overall value plummeted. Take his performance on 01/11 vs POR. A dismal 3-for-11 shooting night yielded a brutal -10.3 Impact because he offered zero rebounds and poor efficiency to salvage his minutes. Even when he tried to pivot to playmaking, as he did with six assists on 12/03 vs BOS, his extreme offensive passivity—taking just six shots in 36 minutes—dragged him down to a -4.4 Impact. He remains a lethal weapon when hot, but a glaring liability when his aggression fades.

Miles McBride's mid-season stretch was defined by a drastic Jekyll-and-Hyde split between his spot starts and his reserve minutes. Thrust into the starting lineup on 01/18 vs PHX, he erupted as a primary perimeter weapon by pouring in 23 points. His blistering 5-for-12 shooting from deep and aggressive offensive initiation fueled a massive +20.4 Impact score. However, that rhythm completely vanished whenever he returned to the bench. He hit rock bottom during a disastrous outing on 03/31 vs HOU, managing just three points on a brutal 1-for-9 shooting performance. That horrific shot selection and offensive stagnation crippled his minutes, yielding a dreadful -19.0 Impact score. He occasionally salvaged these quiet scoring nights with sheer grit, like when he posted a +3.1 Impact score on 04/03 vs CHI despite scoring only six points. In that contest, McBride relied entirely on relentless defensive ball pressure and hustle to tilt the floor without needing the ball in his hands.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. McBride's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games McBride locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +2.7, second-half: -1.0. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 38 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Mitchell 64.9 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.23
PTS 15
P. Pritchard 42.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
FG% 22.2%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
C. Gillespie 38.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 32.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
T. Maxey 30.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
L. Ball 30.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
S. Curry 27.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
K. Knueppel 27.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
B. Williams 27.3 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Mitchell 57.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
L. Ball 56.2 poss
FG% 36.8%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.32
PTS 18
C. Gillespie 47.0 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
P. Pritchard 45.5 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
S. Curry 41.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
T. Maxey 36.9 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 18
I. Quickley 36.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
R. Rollins 33.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Harden 32.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

51
Games
11.1
PPG
2.2
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
41.7
FG%
41.9
3P%
79.2
FT%
25.2
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played