GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Grayson Allen 36.4m
23
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
+8.9

Overcame a brutal volume-shooting performance by transforming into an elite defensive playmaker (+6.5) and hustle engine (+4.5). His willingness to grind through a cold shooting night with relentless off-ball activity drove a surprisingly high positive impact.

Shooting
FG 7/21 (33.3%)
3PT 4/13 (30.8%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg -0.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +4.5
Defense +6.5
Raw total +25.2
Avg player in 36.4m -16.3
Impact +8.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dillon Brooks 34.6m
22
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.6

High-volume inefficiency inside the arc severely undercut a hot perimeter shooting night. While he brought his trademark hustle (+3.5), defensive breakdowns (-1.3) and hidden costs like empty-possession turnovers ultimately dragged his net impact slightly below zero.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 30.3%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.6m
Offense +11.6
Hustle +3.5
Defense -1.3
Raw total +13.8
Avg player in 34.6m -15.4
Impact -1.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Royce O'Neale 34.0m
9
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.8

Settled exclusively for perimeter jumpers, completely abandoning any interior pressure. Despite decent defensive metrics, his severe negative net impact suggests costly turnovers or transition defensive breakdowns crippled his overall effectiveness on the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -4.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Offense +4.7
Hustle +0.7
Defense +1.9
Raw total +7.3
Avg player in 34.0m -15.1
Impact -7.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.8

Continued a trend of poor shooting efficiency, but salvaged his floor time with spectacular defensive engagement (+4.5) and relentless hustle. The sheer volume of extra possessions he generated outweighed the damage of his missed perimeter looks.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.2%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +4.8
Defense +4.5
Raw total +16.0
Avg player in 27.1m -12.2
Impact +3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Mark Williams 23.6m
7
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.8

A sharp decline in offensive touches limited his usual interior dominance, though he still generated value through active hustle (+3.4). Defensive struggles (-0.7) against opposing bigs prevented him from making a more significant positive impact.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg +0.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +8.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.7
Raw total +11.4
Avg player in 23.6m -10.6
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 78.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+12.5

An absolute menace in the margins, generating an astronomical hustle score (+8.9) that completely swung the game's momentum. Combined with smart perimeter shot selection and suffocating defense, he delivered a masterclass in high-impact role-playing.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +9.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +4.2
Raw total +22.9
Avg player in 23.6m -10.4
Impact +12.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 18.1m
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.8

Snapped a highly efficient interior streak by vanishing from the offensive game plan entirely. While his defensive rotations remained solid, the lack of rim pressure and offensive gravity resulted in a net-negative stint.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -48.9
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +1.4
Defense +1.3
Raw total +3.2
Avg player in 18.1m -8.0
Impact -4.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.1

Struggled to make an imprint on the game due to a severe lack of hustle plays and low offensive involvement. While he didn't make glaring mistakes defensively, his passive approach left the team playing essentially 4-on-5 on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -94.6
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.1m
Offense +2.1
Hustle +0.4
Defense +1.6
Raw total +4.1
Avg player in 14.1m -6.2
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Ryan Dunn 12.1m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.9

An offensive black hole whose inability to convert any of his field goal attempts derailed the team's spacing. Even adequate defensive positioning couldn't salvage a performance defined by empty possessions and missed opportunities.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -65.4
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Offense -4.2
Hustle +0.7
Defense +1.1
Raw total -2.4
Avg player in 12.1m -5.5
Impact -7.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.5

Poor offensive execution was completely overshadowed by a frantic, high-energy defensive shift. His elite hustle metrics (+4.2) in limited minutes disrupted opposing sets and manufactured a positive overall rating.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -65.0
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Offense +1.2
Hustle +4.2
Defense +1.6
Raw total +7.0
Avg player in 10.0m -4.5
Impact +2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.1

Logged a brief, uneventful stint characterized entirely by safe defensive positioning (+1.2). Avoided any negative plays but failed to generate any offensive gravity.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -103.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.4
Defense +1.2
Raw total +1.6
Avg player in 3.3m -1.5
Impact +0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

A completely empty offensive shift dragged his overall rating into the negative despite decent defensive metrics. The total absence of hustle plays in his limited minutes prevented him from carving out a positive role.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -103.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Offense -1.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense +1.5
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 3.3m -1.5
Impact -1.5
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
LAC LA Clippers
S Ivica Zubac 33.3m
14
pts
20
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.7

Flawless shot selection around the rim maximized his offensive possessions without wasting a single touch. His massive defensive rating (+7.7) reflects total dominance of the painted area, deterring drives and securing the glass to anchor the interior.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/9 (44.4%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +12.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Offense +12.2
Hustle +1.6
Defense +7.7
Raw total +21.5
Avg player in 33.3m -14.8
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Kobe Sanders 31.2m
12
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.7

Despite an aggressive scoring surge that exceeded his recent averages, severe hidden costs—likely a barrage of live-ball turnovers or foul trouble—dragged his overall rating deeply into the red. The scoring volume completely masked underlying rotational struggles and poor defensive execution (-0.6).

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +21.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Offense +6.8
Hustle +1.0
Defense -0.6
Raw total +7.2
Avg player in 31.2m -13.9
Impact -6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Kris Dunn 30.2m
8
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-12.8

A brutal combination of forced shots and poor offensive execution cratered his overall impact score. While he generated excellent hustle metrics (+4.6) by fighting through screens, his inability to convert on high-volume attempts and likely turnover issues stalled the offense completely.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -6.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Offense -4.6
Hustle +4.6
Defense +0.7
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 30.2m -13.5
Impact -12.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Kawhi Leonard 29.9m
25
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.3

Maintained his recent scoring aggression, though a heavy diet of missed perimeter jumpers slightly dampened his overall efficiency. Elite defensive positioning (+3.2) and steady hustle metrics ensured his floor impact remained highly positive, offsetting any negative value from offensive fouls or turnovers.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 6/10 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 34.7%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Offense +14.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.2
Raw total +20.6
Avg player in 29.9m -13.3
Impact +7.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S John Collins 28.2m
16
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.6

Continued a highly efficient offensive pattern, capitalizing on high-quality looks in the paint to drive a massive box score impact. Active interior rotations and strong hustle numbers (+3.7) amplified his value, making him a two-way force in his minutes.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -2.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +17.7
Hustle +3.7
Defense +2.7
Raw total +24.1
Avg player in 28.2m -12.5
Impact +11.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
20
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.5

Capitalized on a massive offensive breakout by hunting high-value perimeter looks and finishing decisively. His two-way engagement was evident through strong defensive rotations (+2.5) that complemented his scoring surge perfectly.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg +33.9
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense +2.5
Raw total +16.1
Avg player in 23.9m -10.6
Impact +5.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.7

Continued a prolonged slump of perimeter inefficiency, failing to punish defensive closeouts. The lack of offensive gravity negated his steady positional defense, rendering his minutes largely detrimental to the team's spacing.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +37.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Offense -1.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.9
Raw total +1.1
Avg player in 22.2m -9.8
Impact -8.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Brook Lopez 20.8m
8
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.6

A noticeable drop in offensive aggression limited his usual rim-pressure, resulting in a perfectly neutral overall impact. He provided adequate spacing but failed to generate the defensive deterrence or hustle plays needed to swing the game.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +40.2
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Offense +7.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Raw total +8.6
Avg player in 20.8m -9.2
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Cam Christie 14.2m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.0

Broke out of a severe shooting slump by taking smarter, in-rhythm attempts rather than forcing the issue. Excellent defensive execution (+2.5) completely offset his low-hustle output, resulting in a perfectly balanced net-zero performance.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +78.9
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.5
Raw total +6.4
Avg player in 14.2m -6.4
Impact -0.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Brown 3.0m
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.5

Took a massive step back in offensive usage compared to his recent hot streak, deferring entirely to teammates. However, he salvaged his impact score through highly effective defensive positioning (+2.6) during his limited floor time.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Offense +1.1
Hustle +0.2
Defense +2.6
Raw total +3.9
Avg player in 3.0m -1.4
Impact +2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.1

Maximized a brief rotational stint by executing perfectly on his lone offensive touch and maintaining strict defensive discipline. Provided a quick burst of positive value without committing any costly mistakes.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 104.2%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.0m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense +1.2
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 3.0m -1.3
Impact +3.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0