PHX

2025-26 Season

DILLON BROOKS

Phoenix Suns | Guard-Forward | 6-7
Dillon Brooks
20.5PPG
3.8RPG
1.8APG
30.9MPG
+8.1 Impact

Brooks produces at an elite rate for a 31-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+8.1
Scoring +18.3
Points Scored 20.5 PPG = +20.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -7.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +5.0
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 1.8 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -4.2
Turnovers 1.8/g (live + dead blend) = -4.2
Defense -0.1
Steals 1.0/g = +2.3
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.6
Hustle & Effort +3.0
Rebounds 3.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.0
Contested Shots 2.5/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.7/g = +1.1
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +18.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.9
Net Impact
+8.1
89th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 93th
20.5 PPG
Efficiency 45th
53.9% TS
Playmaking 29th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 72th
3.8 RPG
Defense 44th
+6.8/g
Hustle 47th
+8.9/g
Creation 56th
+3.01/g
Shot Making 80th
+8.64/g
TO Discipline 48th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Dillon Brooks opened the 2025-26 season defined by unapologetic, high-volume gunning that somehow translated into winning basketball through sheer defensive grit. Look at the 10/25 vs DEN game, where he managed just 15 points on an ugly 6/18 from the floor. He still generated a +6.8 Impact score because his relentless perimeter harassment and loose-ball hustle created immense non-scoring value for his squad. When his jumper actually fell, he was an absolute wrecking ball. During the 11/17 vs ATL matchup, he poured in 34 points on sharp 14/25 shooting, earning a massive +28.4 Impact score by pairing his usual physical edge with elite shot-making. But that irrational confidence always comes with a steep tax. In the 12/09 vs MIN contest, he hoisted his way to 18 points on 20 shots, resulting in a -1.9 Impact score because those wasted offensive possessions and forced looks finally outweighed his energy on the other end.

Dillon Brooks’s midseason stretch was defined by a chaotic shot diet that swung wildly between scorching offensive outbursts and agonizingly inefficient brick-laying sessions. When he operated within the flow of the offense, the results were spectacular, peaking on 01/10 vs NYK with 27 points, seven rebounds, and five assists. His blistering 5-for-9 shooting from beyond the arc and suffocating perimeter defense earned him a massive +20.6 impact score that night. However, his tendency to force contested looks often actively harmed the team. On 01/16 vs DET, despite scoring 16 points, Brooks posted a dismal -8.1 impact score because his atrocious 4-for-16 shooting hijacked possessions and killed offensive momentum. Yet, he occasionally salvaged his value through sheer willpower, like his 01/14 vs MIA performance. He bricked nine of his ten three-point attempts to finish with 25 points on 24 shots, but relentless defensive hustle and physical disruption still yielded a +9.0 impact score. You live with the ugly nights because his aggressive edge remains an essential, if volatile, weapon.

A chaotic blend of blistering offensive eruptions and cringe-inducing shooting slumps defined this mid-season stretch for Dillon Brooks. He caught absolute fire on 01/29 vs DET, pouring in 40 points on a highly efficient 13-of-22 from the floor. Because he paired that deadly perimeter accuracy with relentless physical play, his impact score skyrocketed to a staggering +42.4. His shot selection, however, frequently devolved into outright chucking. Just look at 02/10 vs DAL. Despite logging 23 points, his impact was a muted +4.3 because he needed an absurd 26 field goal attempts to get there, including a brutal 1-of-10 from three-point range. The hidden costs of his erratic trigger finger were even more damaging on 02/03 vs POR, where he posted a dismal -7.0 impact score. His 3-of-16 shooting performance completely derailed the offense, offering zero secondary playmaking to salvage a disastrous night.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Brooks has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Brooks doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 12 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 53 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Dort 70.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 13
S. Bey 65.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
J. Williams 63.1 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
O. Anunoby 55.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
J. Smith Jr. 55.2 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
D. DeRozan 52.8 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 16
L. James 48.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
K. Dunn 43.6 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
A. Thompson 43.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
T. Harris 42.5 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DeRozan 85.6 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 8
J. Johnson 66.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 7
J. Randle 62.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
T. Murphy III 57.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 18
M. Porter Jr. 55.9 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 16
K. Leonard 52.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 12
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 10
C. Flagg 46.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 13
C. Holmgren 46.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
L. James 46.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12

SEASON STATS

62
Games
20.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.8
APG
1.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
43.6
FG%
35.4
3P%
85.6
FT%
30.9
MPG

GAME LOG

62 games played