PHX

2025-26 Season

GRAYSON ALLEN

Phoenix Suns | Guard | 6-3
Grayson Allen
16.2PPG
3.0RPG
3.8APG
28.4MPG
+5.6 Impact

Allen produces at an elite rate for a 28-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+5.6
Scoring +14.4
Points Scored 16.2 PPG = +16.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -5.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.0
Creation +1.4
Assists & Self-Creation 3.8 AST/g + self-creation = +1.4
Turnovers -3.6
Turnovers 1.6/g (live + dead blend) = -3.6
Defense +1.3
Steals 1.3/g = +3.0
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.0
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Rebounds 3.0 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.1
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 2.1/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +15.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.2
Net Impact
+5.6
82th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 80th
16.2 PPG
Efficiency 75th
57.4% TS
Playmaking 71th
3.8 APG
Rebounding 53th
3.0 RPG
Defense 74th
+9.5/g
Hustle 47th
+8.9/g
Creation 86th
+4.33/g
Shot Making 94th
+10.64/g
TO Discipline 52th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Grayson Allen's opening stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating between a trigger-happy liability and a game-breaking sniper. Despite pouring in 23 points on 10/27 vs UTA, his brutal shot selection dragged down the offense. He bricked nine of his 13 three-point attempts in that contest, resulting in a meager +0.2 Impact score because his volume came at the direct expense of offensive flow. He flipped the script entirely a few nights later on 11/01 vs UTA. In that matchup, Allen generated a massive +16.5 Impact score despite scoring only 14 points, creating immense non-scoring value by crashing the glass for seven rebounds, dishing six assists, and grinding out crucial defensive stops. The undeniable peak of his season arrived on 11/11 vs NOP. Allen went completely nuclear with 42 points on 10-for-15 shooting from deep, posting a staggering +49.0 Impact score as his flawless perimeter execution simply broke the opposing scheme. It was a fleeting high, but for one night, he was the most dangerous shooter in the building.

This midseason stretch was defined by Grayson Allen's aggressive transition from a spotty bench contributor into an indispensable, high-volume perimeter starter. The period began with a disastrous outing on 01/06 vs HOU, where his total inability to find the basket on 0-for-6 shooting resulted in a brutal -8.5 impact score, completely negating his six assists. He quickly abandoned his hesitation and embraced a greener light. Catching fire on 01/16 vs DET, Allen launched a staggering twenty three-pointers to rack up 33 points and a massive +15.2 impact score. That sheer willingness to let it fly stretched opposing defenses to their breaking point. Even when his volume didn't translate to massive point totals, he found ways to tilt the floor. During his 01/12 vs WAS performance, Allen scored a modest 12 points but still generated a stellar +10.8 impact score by battling for seven rebounds and making the gritty hustle plays necessary to secure extra possessions.

Grayson Allen’s mid-season stretch was defined by his jarring transition into a high-volume, erratic bench gunner. He operated with an absolute green light, which yielded wild fluctuations in his actual value on the floor. During the game on 02/21 vs ORL, he hoisted a staggering 14 three-point attempts, hitting just four of them en route to 27 points. Yet, he still managed a +16.1 Impact score because his aggressive floor-spacing and seven crucial rebounds kept possessions alive. That exact same trigger-happy approach severely backfired on 03/31 vs ORL. Allen tallied just 10 points on a dismal 4-for-14 from the floor, earning a -12.6 Impact score as his poor shot selection and lack of playmaking actively derailed the offense. He finally found a healthier balance on 04/05 vs CHI. Though he scored a meager six points, his +3.5 Impact score reflected a disciplined outing where he created non-scoring value by grabbing five rebounds and keeping the ball moving instead of forcing bad looks.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Allen posts positive impact in 81% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 31% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Allen locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 15 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Mykhailiuk 44.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
B. Beal 43.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
K. Dunn 43.1 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 13
P. Larsson 43.0 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.33
PTS 14
J. Murray 35.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
A. Thompson 33.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 14
K. George 33.0 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
B. Williams 29.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
T. da Silva 28.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Fears 27.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Robinson 47.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
B. Beal 43.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
S. Mykhailiuk 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
K. Dunn 38.6 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
C. Johnson 36.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
N. Clifford 36.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Jones Jr. 30.9 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 16
N. Powell 30.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 12
B. Brown 30.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Vassell 28.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

53
Games
16.2
PPG
3.0
RPG
3.8
APG
1.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
40.4
FG%
35.0
3P%
85.5
FT%
28.4
MPG

GAME LOG

53 games played