2025-26 Season
NICK RICHARDS
2025-26 Season
NICK RICHARDS
Richards produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.
Richards produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 21 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Nick Richards spent the first sixteen games of the 2025-26 season trapped in a brutal cycle of empty minutes and negative floor impact. His absolute nadir arrived on 10/30 vs MEM. During that contest, he logged zero points and just two rebounds over 12 minutes to post a disastrous -15.5 impact score. When a center burns a dozen minutes without making a single field goal or heavily protecting the glass, the resulting offensive stagnation actively sinks the team. He occasionally flashed utility on the boards, grabbing ten rebounds to go with six points on 10/27 vs UTA, but his poor 2-for-6 shooting still dragged his impact down to -0.3. A brief promotion to the starting lineup changed absolutely nothing. During his lone start on 11/14 vs IND, Richards scraped together four points but failed to attempt a single field goal, securing just one rebound across 15 minutes to generate a bleak -6.3 impact score. A big man simply cannot survive in a modern rotation when he consistently acts as a passenger on both ends of the court.
A brutal stretch of irrelevance defined this bleak midseason run for Nick Richards, as he languished deep on the bench and routinely bled points during his brief rotational cameos. Even when given extended run on 12/30 vs WAS, his abysmal 1-for-8 shooting touch dragged his impact down to -4.3. That dismal offensive execution completely negated the value of his nine rebounds. He briefly flipped the script on 02/07 vs DEN, erupting for 15 points and seven boards to post a stellar +11.1 impact score. That rare positive mark stemmed entirely from hyper-efficient shot selection, as he knocked down five of his eight attempts and unexpectedly drained a three-pointer. However, any built-up goodwill vanished completely by 02/21 vs DET. Despite logging 19 minutes, Richards bricked multiple ill-advised perimeter shots to finish with a catastrophic -19.6 impact score. You simply cannot survive in a modern rotation when your baseline production actively harms the team.
Nick Richards spent this fifteen-game stretch devolving from a highly effective bench bruiser into an overexposed spot-starter. Operating primarily as a reserve early on, he routinely dominated the glass to generate immense value without demanding offensive touches. During a gritty tilt vs PHX on 03/05, Richards scored just 9 points but still posted a +3.8 impact score by swallowing up 11 rebounds and doing the necessary dirty work inside. Unfortunately, his overall effectiveness cratered whenever his scoring volume increased at the expense of his rebounding. Look no further than his outing vs LAL on 03/12. He tallied 15 points on highly efficient shooting, yet registered a dismal -5.4 impact score because he grabbed a meager four boards and gave up easy baskets on the other end. By the time he was thrust into the starting lineup in late March, the physical toll was obvious. A brutal start vs PHI on 03/25 yielded just two points and a disastrous -13.9 impact score, forcing an early hook after a mere nine minutes of action.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Richards has posted negative impact in 77% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Average defender. Richards doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.3, second-half: -2.2. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 27 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
47 games played