PHX

2025-26 Season

DEVIN BOOKER

Phoenix Suns | Guard | 6-5
Devin Booker
25.7 PPG
3.9 RPG
6.0 APG
33.4 MPG
+2.5 Impact

Booker produces at an above average rate for a 33-minute workload. 3.2 turnovers per game cost 6.2 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.5
Scoring +16.4
Points 25.7 PPG × +1.00 = +25.7
Missed 2PT 6.2/g × -0.78 = -4.9
Missed 3PT 3.9/g × -0.87 = -3.4
Missed FT 1.0/g × -1.00 = -1.0
Creation +4.3
Assists 6.0/g × +0.50 = +3.0
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -6.2
Turnovers 3.2/g × -1.95 = -6.2
Defense +1.1
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Contested Shots 2.7/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 1.4/g × +0.65 = +0.9
Loose Balls 0.7/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.3/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.9
Raw Impact +18.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.9
Net Impact
+2.5
90th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 96th
25.7 PPG
Efficiency 77th
58.4% TS
Playmaking 90th
6.0 APG
Rebounding 73th
3.9 RPG
Rim Protection 14th
0.08/min
Hustle 28th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 11th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Devin Booker’s opening stretch of the season was defined by extreme stylistic whiplash, bouncing violently between brilliant offensive orchestration and damaging, ball-stopping isolation habits. The raw point totals often masked deeper issues, perfectly illustrated on 10/25 vs DEN where his highly efficient 31 points came attached to a -3.8 impact because poor ball security and lazy transition defense constantly bled value. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to uplift the lineup without dominating the scoreboard. During the 11/18 vs POR matchup, Booker scored a modest 19 points but generated a stellar +6.7 impact by dissecting drop coverage with masterful pace manipulation in the pick-and-roll. Yet, the ugly nights were truly abysmal. His worst tendencies completely hijacked the offense on 11/21 vs MIN, as an atrocious diet of forced, heavily contested jumpers resulted in a miserable 4-for-18 shooting night and a catastrophic -24.1 impact score. If he wants to drive winning basketball, he must abandon these empty-calorie scoring bursts and embrace consistent execution.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, as Devin Booker vacillated between two-way brilliance and stubborn, inefficient isolation play. When fully engaged, he was absolutely unstoppable. Look no further than 12/20 vs GSW, where he dropped 38 points and posted a staggering +20.1 impact score by pairing a massive scoring surge with elite defensive effort. Yet, his reliance on tough jumpers frequently punished his own team. During the 12/27 vs NOP matchup, Booker managed 20 points but recorded a disastrous -18.8 impact, driven entirely by forced isolation attempts and a heavy volume of clanked midrange shots. He occasionally found ways to adapt when his jumper went cold. On 01/11 vs WAS, he scored just 17 points on an ugly 5/14 from the field, but still managed a +3.1 impact by pivoting into a pure facilitator role and dishing out 8 assists to salvage his shift.

Extreme volatility defined Devin Booker’s mid-season campaign, as he wildly oscillated between two-way mastery and damaging, inefficient shot selection. High point totals frequently masked the hidden costs of his floor game. During the 03/17 vs MIN matchup, he poured in 34 points but posted a -1.2 impact score because a dismal 1-for-7 mark from deep and severe overall inefficiency completely negated his scoring volume. Yet, when he dialed in his focus, he could easily break an opponent's scheme. He erupted for 43 points on 03/12 vs IND, leveraging unrelenting offensive volume to dictate the flow and secure a massive +16.7 impact. He also found ways to drive winning without needing to carry the entire offensive load. On 03/05 vs CHI, Booker logged 27 points but still generated a stellar +7.6 impact, as dominant defensive engagement surprisingly fueled his metrics more than his bucket-getting. When he stopped settling for heavily contested jumpers and actually read the floor, his elite ceiling was undeniable.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Booker's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 51% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Booker consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +1.3, second-half: +3.7. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 61 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. McDaniels 74.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 14
C. Braun 71.6 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 13
L. Dort 70.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 17
M. Bridges 65.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 14
D. Jones Jr. 62.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
J. Wells 60.5 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 12
B. Coulibaly 58.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
K. Murray 58.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9
D. Daniels 57.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 22
D. Vassell 55.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 17

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Moody 62.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
C. Braun 61.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
K. Murray 57.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 13
O. Dieng 54.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
J. McDaniels 54.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
B. Coulibaly 51.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
T. Murphy III 51.1 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
S. Bey 49.8 poss
FG% 30.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 11
J. Champagnie 46.7 poss
FG% 11.1%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
J. Wells 46.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

61
Games
25.7
PPG
3.9
RPG
6.0
APG
0.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
45.6
FG%
32.8
3P%
86.8
FT%
33.4
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played