Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
PHX 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 177 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray Hard 7/18 -0.6
Jokić 9/16 +2.6
Hardaway Jr. Hard 6/12 +4.4
Braun 6/10 +1.3
Gordon Open 5/9 +0.1
Johnson Hard 4/9 -0.2
Brown 4/7 +0.9
Jones Open 2/4 -1.0
Strawther Hard 2/3 +2.4

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Allen Hard 8/19 +3.1
Booker 5/14 -3.8
Green Hard 6/13 +1.6
Gillespie Hard 4/11 -1.0
O'Neale Hard 5/8 +6.7
Goodwin Hard 3/8 -1.3
Ighodaro Open 6/7 +3.6
Fleming 0/6 -7.0
Maluach 2/3 +0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
PHX
45/88 Field Goals 39/89
51.1% Field Goal % 43.8%
13/32 3-Pointers 17/47
40.6% 3-Point % 36.2%
22/30 Free Throws 28/37
73.3% Free Throw % 75.7%
61.8% True Shooting % 58.4%
60 Total Rebounds 50
14 Offensive 10
36 Defensive 31
35 Assists 24
3.50 Assist/TO Ratio 8.00
9 Turnovers 3
2 Steals 6
2 Blocks 5
27 Fouls 20
58 Points in Paint 36
11 Fast Break Pts 7
5 Points off TOs 13
15 Second Chance Pts 10
38 Bench Points 37
12 Largest Lead 11
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
23 PTS · 17 REB · 17 AST · 35.4 MIN
+25.76
2
Royce O'Neale
17 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 28.1 MIN
+21.31
3
Grayson Allen
21 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 23.2 MIN
+18.01
4
Devin Booker
22 PTS · 3 REB · 8 AST · 34.7 MIN
+16.29
5
Oso Ighodaro
15 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 33.7 MIN
+13.74
6
Tim Hardaway Jr.
18 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 22.8 MIN
+13.09
7
Jalen Green
21 PTS · 6 REB · 6 AST · 29.1 MIN
+12.64
8
Jamal Murray
21 PTS · 1 REB · 6 AST · 37.9 MIN
+11.39
9
Cameron Johnson
14 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 32.7 MIN
+10.98
10
Collin Gillespie
11 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 27.3 MIN
+9.73
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 R. O'Neale REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 125–123
Q4 0:01 MISS D. Booker 25' 3PT 125–123
Q4 0:11 N. Jokić 11' floating Jump Shot (23 PTS) (J. Murray 6 AST) 125–123
Q4 0:30 D. Booker 10' pullup Jump Shot (22 PTS) 123–123
Q4 0:35 J. Murray 15' fadeaway Jump Shot (21 PTS) 123–121
Q4 0:54 J. Green driving finger roll Layup (21 PTS) (D. Booker 8 AST) 121–121
Q4 1:02 R. O'Neale REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 121–119
Q4 1:06 MISS N. Jokić 10' floating Shot 121–119
Q4 1:21 D. Booker Free Throw 2 of 2 (20 PTS) 121–119
Q4 1:21 D. Booker Free Throw 1 of 2 (19 PTS) 121–118
Q4 1:21 C. Johnson personal FOUL (5 PF) (Booker 2 FT) 121–117
Q4 1:28 J. Goodwin REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 121–117
Q4 1:30 MISS N. Jokić Free Throw 2 of 2 121–117
Q4 1:30 N. Jokić Free Throw 1 of 2 (21 PTS) 121–117
Q4 1:30 D. Booker shooting personal FOUL (3 PF) (Jokić 2 FT) 120–117

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 34.7m
22
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
+8.0

Playmaking gravity salvaged a rough shooting night where he struggled to find his spots against physical coverage. By leveraging the defensive attention he drew, he generated high-value looks for teammates to keep the offense humming. His impact stayed positive purely through offensive orchestration rather than scoring efficiency.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 11/13 (84.6%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg +1.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Oso Ighodaro 33.7m
15
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.5

Near-perfect rim finishing was entirely neutralized by hidden negative values in the margins. Despite extending his streak of hyper-efficient shooting, minor rotational errors and positioning mistakes kept his net impact flat. The raw production didn't translate to a tangible advantage on the scoreboard.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/7 (42.9%)
Advanced
TS% 74.4%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +12.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +6.7
Defense -3.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jalen Green 29.1m
21
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+2.9

Inconsistent shot selection muted the value of his offensive creation. While he showed flashes of solid defensive awareness (+2.0), the missed opportunities in isolation sets dragged his overall impact slightly into the red. He failed to capitalize on the momentum he had built over the previous week.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 29.7%
Net Rtg +15.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +15.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Royce O'Neale 28.1m
17
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.5

Elite two-way execution defined this massive positive swing. Smothering perimeter defense (+4.7) combined with lethal catch-and-shoot precision punished the opponent's drop coverage repeatedly. His high-motor hustle plays (+3.8) consistently extended possessions and broke the opponent's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 95.7%
USG% 13.4%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +4.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.5

Poor perimeter efficiency actively harmed the team's offensive spacing. Although he battled hard defensively (+3.2) and showed good hustle, the wasted possessions in the half-court stalled out multiple runs. The scoring bump from his recent average was entirely offset by the volume of empty trips.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.1%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -6.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.3m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

Off-the-charts hustle metrics (+8.1) and relentless defensive pressure (+5.7) completely overshadowed a clunky shooting performance. He generated extra possessions through sheer willpower, disrupting the opponent's offensive flow at the point of attack. This gritty, blue-collar effort was the driving force behind his positive impact.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -4.5
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +10.2
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
21
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.0

High-volume perimeter spacing stretched the defense thin, creating driving lanes for the primary creators. Strong defensive metrics (+3.9) showed he held his own on the perimeter, preventing easy blow-bys. Even with a high number of missed shots, the sheer threat of his spacing drove a strong positive differential.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 32.8%
Net Rtg -38.1
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.5

A disastrous offensive showing (-1.8 box) cratered his overall value. Forcing bad looks from the perimeter without converting a single field goal derailed the team's offensive rhythm entirely. The catastrophic shooting slump completely eclipsed his passable defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 19.3%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -27.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.8

Maximized a brief rotation stint by providing immediate rim deterrence (+3.4 defense). He didn't force any offensive action, instead relying on high-percentage dump-offs to maintain efficiency. This disciplined, defense-first approach yielded a highly effective short shift.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +26.4
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.7

A brief, cardio-only stint resulted in a negligible negative impact. He failed to register any meaningful offensive actions, merely swinging the ball on the perimeter. The lack of aggression rendered him practically invisible during his time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.5m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -1.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 37.9m
21
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.6

Heavy shot volume with poor returns severely depressed his offensive efficiency. While he showed commendable defensive engagement (+2.8), the sheer number of empty possessions he generated stalled the offense. Forcing looks against set defenses ultimately resulted in a net-negative outing.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.1%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +3.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 13.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Nikola Jokić 35.4m
23
pts
17
reb
17
ast
Impact
+26.0

Complete offensive orchestration drove a massive box score impact (+24.9), picking apart the defense with elite processing speed. His defensive positioning (+4.0) disrupted passing lanes effectively, compounding the damage he did as a primary hub. The sheer volume of high-value shot creation dictated the entire flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 60.3%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +17.7
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cameron Johnson 32.7m
14
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.4

High hustle metrics (+5.7) kept him afloat despite a cold perimeter shooting night. His defensive activity masked the inefficiency from beyond the arc, resulting in a perfectly neutral overall impact. The sheer volume of missed threes prevented a true positive swing.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.1%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -15.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 64.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Christian Braun 32.5m
13
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.9

Defensive lapses (-0.7) and hidden negative plays completely erased his efficient finishing profile. Despite finding good cuts to the basket, he gave up too much ground on the perimeter to maintain a positive differential. The underlying metric plunge suggests he was repeatedly targeted on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Aaron Gordon 26.2m
16
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.0

A lack of defensive resistance (-0.4) and minimal hustle contributions dragged down an otherwise efficient interior performance. He failed to dictate physicality in the paint, allowing opponents too much comfort around the rim. The empty defensive impact ultimately outweighed his reliable finishing.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 5/10 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.7%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -8.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
18
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.3

Capitalized on high-quality perimeter looks to generate a strong positive box impact (+12.9). His sudden scoring surge forced defensive rotations, opening up the floor for the secondary unit. Adequate enough defensive positioning ensured he didn't give back the value of his hot shooting stretch.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg +8.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +13.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 22.6m
9
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.2

Solid defensive metrics (+2.9) couldn't salvage a surprisingly low-impact stint. Despite continuing his streak of efficient shooting, a lack of overall involvement and hustle plays (+0.8) limited his ability to swing the momentum. He was too passive in half-court sets to generate a positive net rating.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +11.4
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
4
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Severe defensive breakdowns (-2.2) heavily outweighed his modest rebounding contributions. He struggled to stay in front of his assignments, bleeding points on the perimeter. The lack of offensive gravity meant he couldn't offset the damage done on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +17.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense -2.5
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

A quick burst of highly efficient shot-making completely reversed his recent slump. He maximized a short rotational stint by taking only high-percentage looks within the flow of the offense. This decisive shot selection drove a surprisingly robust positive impact in limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +76.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0