GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 35.3m
24
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+5.1

Overcame a brutal perimeter shooting night by leveraging his elite playmaking and drawing heavy defensive attention. His ability to orchestrate the offense and generate high-quality looks for others drove a strong positive impact. He smartly adapted his game when the outside shot wasn't falling, proving his value goes beyond pure scoring.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 14/15 (93.3%)
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -26.8
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Offense +21.2
Hustle +1.6
Defense +2.2
Raw total +25.0
Avg player in 35.3m -19.9
Impact +5.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Oso Ighodaro 31.8m
8
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.7

Defensive dominance and flawless interior efficiency masked a surprisingly muted overall impact score. While he executed perfectly when involved, a low usage rate limited his ability to swing the game further. Consistent hustle plays ensured he was a net positive, even if his offensive role was strictly marginalized.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/3 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 8.1%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Offense +7.7
Hustle +4.0
Defense +7.1
Raw total +18.8
Avg player in 31.8m -18.1
Impact +0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Royce O'Neale 29.1m
15
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.5

Elite defensive metrics anchored his value, completely offsetting a high volume of missed perimeter shots. His ability to blow up opponent actions and secure stops allowed him to stay on the floor despite the streaky shooting. The defensive versatility he provided was the absolute linchpin of his positive rating.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -25.3
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Offense +11.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +6.5
Raw total +20.9
Avg player in 29.1m -16.4
Impact +4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Dillon Brooks 27.9m
27
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.5

A massive offensive breakout completely reversed his recent shooting struggles and drove a stellar impact score. He combined aggressive, high-volume shot-making with elite hustle plays to dominate his perimeter matchup. This two-way intensity set a punishing physical tone for the entire rotation.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 37.1%
Net Rtg -31.8
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Offense +18.0
Hustle +4.6
Defense +0.8
Raw total +23.4
Avg player in 27.9m -15.9
Impact +7.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Grayson Allen 25.8m
10
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.9

Poor perimeter shot selection dragged down his impact, as he repeatedly stalled offensive momentum with missed jumpers. Strong hustle metrics and defensive effort partially mitigated the damage from his noticeable shooting slump. Ultimately, the empty offensive possessions outweighed his high-energy floor game.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Offense +6.8
Hustle +4.5
Defense +2.4
Raw total +13.7
Avg player in 25.8m -14.6
Impact -0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Despite excellent hustle and defensive metrics, his overall impact dipped into the negative due to severe inefficiency inside the arc. While his perimeter shooting was a bright spot, his inability to finish closer to the basket resulted in costly empty trips. The high-energy defensive effort simply couldn't fully erase the offensive friction.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -39.7
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +5.0
Defense +5.0
Raw total +15.5
Avg player in 28.6m -16.3
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.6

Capitalized on his minutes with highly efficient perimeter shooting and disruptive defensive play. He refused to waste possessions, taking smart shots in the flow of the offense while applying heavy point-of-attack pressure on the other end. This balanced, two-way execution provided a crucial spark off the bench.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.1m
Offense +6.5
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.2
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 15.1m -8.5
Impact +2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.1

Strong defensive metrics were entirely undone by poor shot selection and offensive inefficiency. He struggled to find any rhythm on the scoring end, resulting in wasted possessions that dragged down his overall rating. The defensive intensity kept him afloat, but the offensive struggles were glaring.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 30.7%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +30.8
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.6m
Offense +2.3
Hustle +1.8
Defense +3.1
Raw total +7.2
Avg player in 14.6m -8.3
Impact -1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

Disastrous offensive execution completely tanked his impact score during a highly detrimental rotation. Firing blanks from the field while offering zero hustle or defensive resistance made him a massive liability. His presence on the floor actively derailed the team's momentum on both ends.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -23.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Offense -4.1
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.1
Raw total -4.0
Avg player in 13.2m -7.4
Impact -11.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.5

A completely ineffective stint where missed shots and poor defensive positioning quickly bled points. He failed to establish any interior presence, resulting in a sharp drop-off from his recent reliable production. The team was demonstrably worse during his brief, empty rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -57.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Offense -0.7
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.7
Raw total -0.3
Avg player in 7.2m -4.2
Impact -4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.6

Failed to make a positive mark during a brief appearance, missing his only look and offering little defensive resistance. The lack of physical engagement led to a quick negative swing in his highly limited floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Offense -0.8
Hustle +0.4
Defense -0.1
Raw total -0.5
Avg player in 3.8m -2.1
Impact -2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.2

Maximized a tiny window of playing time with absolute offensive perfection. Hitting every shot he took provided an immediate, highly efficient scoring punch that rapidly spiked his impact score. He executed his role flawlessly without forcing a single bad look.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 125.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Offense +5.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total +5.3
Avg player in 3.8m -2.1
Impact +3.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Koby Brea 3.8m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.0

A forced perimeter miss and a total lack of offensive gravity resulted in a slightly negative rating during his short stint. While he held his own defensively, the empty offensive possession prevented him from breaking even.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Offense -0.4
Hustle +0.7
Defense +0.9
Raw total +1.2
Avg player in 3.8m -2.2
Impact -1.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 36.5m
24
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.1

A stark drop-off from his recent elite scoring tear resulted in a highly negative overall impact. High-volume inefficiency inside the arc bogged down the offense, completely offsetting his perimeter success. The heavy minute load magnified these empty possessions, preventing the unit from establishing a rhythm.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.1%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +24.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Offense +8.2
Hustle +2.7
Defense +2.8
Raw total +13.7
Avg player in 36.5m -20.8
Impact -7.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Cameron Johnson 35.0m
15
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.7

Despite solid individual shooting splits and defensive metrics, his overall impact cratered during heavy minutes. The scoring volume masked a disjointed floor game where the team consistently bled points while he was on the court. He struggled to translate personal efficiency into positive lineup outcomes.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +19.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Offense +8.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.4
Raw total +13.2
Avg player in 35.0m -19.9
Impact -6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Nikola Jokić 31.4m
26
pts
9
reb
10
ast
Impact
+10.7

Flawless shooting efficiency created an insurmountable mathematical advantage, as he literally never wasted a possession from the field. By eliminating missed shots, he completely choked off opponent transition opportunities. Strong defensive positioning further amplified this masterclass in offensive optimization.

Shooting
FG 7/7 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 109.8%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg +25.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Offense +25.4
Hustle +0.8
Defense +2.3
Raw total +28.5
Avg player in 31.4m -17.8
Impact +10.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Peyton Watson 27.6m
11
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.7

High-level hustle plays and near-perfect shot selection maximized his value during his floor time. He refused to force the issue offensively, taking only what the defense gave him to maintain excellent efficiency. This low-usage, high-energy profile provided a steadying presence on the wing.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 95.5%
USG% 9.7%
Net Rtg +30.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Offense +13.0
Hustle +3.9
Defense +1.5
Raw total +18.4
Avg player in 27.6m -15.7
Impact +2.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Spencer Jones 27.2m
16
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.3

An unexpected scoring explosion completely shattered his recent averages and drove a massive positive impact. Elite perimeter shot selection generated immense offensive gravity, while steady hustle metrics ensured he wasn't just a one-dimensional threat.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Offense +16.6
Hustle +3.1
Defense +1.1
Raw total +20.8
Avg player in 27.2m -15.5
Impact +5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.6

A sudden, scorching perimeter barrage completely warped the opposing defense and drove his high positive score. Breaking out of a recent slump, his aggressive shot profile paid off massively by creating crucial floor spacing. Minimal defensive contributions were easily hidden by this overwhelming offensive output.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 7/11 (63.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 82.1%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg +20.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Offense +17.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.1
Raw total +20.1
Avg player in 27.4m -15.5
Impact +4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 27.0m
4
pts
2
reb
10
ast
Impact
-3.0

Elite hustle metrics and primary playmaking couldn't salvage a negative overall rating. A sharp regression in his personal scoring efficiency allowed defenders to sag off and clog passing lanes. The lack of individual scoring gravity ultimately stalled the offense despite his high-energy effort.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +7.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Offense +5.1
Hustle +6.0
Defense +1.2
Raw total +12.3
Avg player in 27.0m -15.3
Impact -3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
9
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.4

Highly efficient interior finishing anchored his positive impact during a short stint. He capitalized on his physical matchups, converting high-percentage looks to keep the offense humming. Steady, fundamental play in the paint outweighed his lack of perimeter mobility.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.9%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Offense +9.2
Hustle +1.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 15.2m -8.7
Impact +2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Zeke Nnaji 8.1m
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.2

Provided a brief but stabilizing presence with mistake-free basketball in limited action. Solid defensive positioning and taking only high-percentage looks ensured he didn't bleed value. He executed his narrow frontcourt role perfectly without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +9.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.6
Raw total +4.8
Avg player in 8.1m -4.6
Impact +0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

Registered a completely empty stat line during his brief time on the court. He failed to make any tangible impact on either end, resulting in a slight negative drag on the lineup.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.5m -0.8
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.1

Barely saw the floor but managed to register positive hustle metrics in a fleeting appearance. He avoided any negative plays during his brief stint to maintain a perfectly neutral rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +0.8
Defense -0.5
Raw total +0.8
Avg player in 1.5m -0.7
Impact +0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

Wasted possessions with poor shot selection during a micro-stint on the floor. Firing blanks from the perimeter in limited minutes quickly tanked his overall value.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Offense -0.9
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 1.5m -0.8
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0