Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
OKC 2P — 3P —
PHX 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 181 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Wiggins 6/13 -2.0
Williams Hard 11/12 +13.2
Joe Hard 6/10 +9.7
Williams 6/9 +4.1
McCain Hard 5/8 +4.6
Williams Hard 4/8 +1.3
Holmgren 4/8 -0.6
Wallace 2/7 -3.5
Dort 4/6 +2.7
Boeheim Hard 1/4 -1.3

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Brooks Hard 9/19 +1.8
Bouyea 4/12 -3.2
O'Neale Hard 4/11 +4.0
Goodwin 5/10 +1.5
Coffey 3/8 -2.5
Fleming Hard 3/7 +0.3
Gillespie Hard 2/7 -0.2
Ighodaro 4/4 +3.7
Williams Open 3/4 +1.2
Maluach Open 3/4 +0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
PHX
52/89 Field Goals 43/92
58.4% Field Goal % 46.7%
15/36 3-Pointers 15/42
41.7% 3-Point % 35.7%
17/19 Free Throws 8/13
89.5% Free Throw % 61.5%
69.8% True Shooting % 55.8%
47 Total Rebounds 48
8 Offensive 15
29 Defensive 28
28 Assists 26
3.50 Assist/TO Ratio 2.17
8 Turnovers 10
6 Steals 4
3 Blocks 5
8 Fouls 12
60 Points in Paint 52
6 Fast Break Pts 12
16 Points off TOs 8
18 Second Chance Pts 21
74 Bench Points 50
37 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Williams
28 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 19.6 MIN
+28.18
2
Kenrich Williams
15 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 23.0 MIN
+19.56
3
Isaiah Joe
21 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 18.1 MIN
+16.73
4
Oso Ighodaro
8 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 16.8 MIN
+16.29
5
Dillon Brooks
23 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 24.4 MIN
+15.73
6
Jaylin Williams
11 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 28.2 MIN
+15.3
7
Jared McCain
12 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 22.3 MIN
+12.92
8
Jordan Goodwin
12 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 27.7 MIN
+12.54
9
Aaron Wiggins
12 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 25.1 MIN
+10.79
10
Isaiah Hartenstein
8 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 17.6 MIN
+10.46
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:20 K. Maluach REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 136–109
Q4 0:23 R. Fleming BLOCK (1 BLK) 136–109
Q4 0:23 MISS B. Boeheim pullup 3PT - blocked 136–109
Q4 0:28 K. Williams REBOUND (Off:4 Def:2) 136–109
Q4 0:31 MISS J. Williams 26' 3PT 136–109
Q4 0:51 A. Coffey driving finger roll Layup (9 PTS) (R. Fleming 2 AST) 136–109
Q4 1:03 K. Brea REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 136–107
Q4 1:06 MISS J. McCain 19' pullup Shot 136–107
Q4 1:21 TEAM defensive REBOUND 136–107
Q4 1:23 MISS J. Bouyea driving floating Shot 136–107
Q4 1:34 K. Williams tip Layup (15 PTS) 136–107
Q4 1:34 K. Williams REBOUND (Off:3 Def:2) 134–107
Q4 1:35 MISS A. Wiggins running alley-oop DUNK 134–107
Q4 1:38 A. Wiggins STEAL (2 STL) 134–107
Q4 1:38 R. Fleming bad pass TURNOVER (2 TO) 134–107

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Jordan Goodwin 27.7m
12
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.7

Relentless point-of-attack hustle and defensive disruption perfectly balanced out a highly inefficient shooting night. Generating extra possessions through sheer effort completely erased the cost of his missed jumpers.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -54.3
+/- -32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dillon Brooks 24.4m
23
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.6

Relentless defensive physicality barely kept his rating positive against a barrage of poor shot choices. Clanking a high volume of contested jumpers stunted the offense, but his ability to lock down the opposing primary initiator salvaged his shift.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 42.1%
Net Rtg -51.9
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring +15.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +3.4
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Royce O'Neale 23.6m
12
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.4

Impact plummeted due to a highly one-dimensional shot profile that saw him miss a barrage of attempts from beyond the arc. Settling exclusively for perimeter looks allowed the defense to stay home and stagnated the half-court flow.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -54.5
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +6.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.3

Poor execution when orchestrating the offense and failing to capitalize on open looks tanked his rating. His inability to break down the primary defender led to stagnant possessions and late-clock bailouts.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -37.4
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 87.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Mark Williams 15.9m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.9

A severe lack of rebounding presence for a center muted the value of his reliable interior finishing. Getting pushed around on the defensive glass prevented his team from securing crucial stops, resulting in a slightly negative overall grade.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -58.8
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.9m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.7

The sheer volume of missed shots heavily outweighed his high-energy hustle plays. While he brought great intensity and generated extra possessions, forcing difficult looks in traffic consistently derailed the offensive rhythm.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.7%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -25.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Ryan Dunn 22.8m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.4

Becoming a complete offensive liability caused his rating to plummet. Defenders actively sagged off him to clog the paint, completely destroying the team's spacing and stalling out multiple possessions.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/4 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.4%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Amir Coffey 20.1m
9
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.9

Stagnant off-ball movement and failing to convert on standard rotation catch-and-shoot opportunities led to a negative grade. He struggled to find the rhythm of the game, often disrupting the offensive flow with hesitant decision-making.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.4

Defensive lapses at the point of attack couldn't be covered up by average offensive efficiency. Getting caught out of position on pick-and-rolls gave up easy driving lanes that compromised the team's overall defensive integrity.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +30.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Oso Ighodaro 16.8m
8
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.6

Flawless rim-running and elite defensive rotations skyrocketed his impact score. Continuing a streak of highly efficient play, he suffocated the opponent at the rim and capitalized on every lob opportunity.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -38.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.8m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
6
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.6

Dominating the glass and providing immediate rim protection off the bench fueled a highly positive rating in limited minutes. His sheer physical presence altered multiple shots and secured critical extra possessions.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +16.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Koby Brea 7.8m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.7

Perfectly executing his role as a floor-spacer caused a massive spike in his impact score during a short burst. Punishing defensive closeouts without hesitation provided an instant offensive jolt that maximized his brief time on the court.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Cason Wallace 26.2m
4
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.9

Impact cratered due to a severe lack of offensive rhythm and bricking multiple perimeter looks. Opponents actively ignored him on the perimeter, which bogged down the spacing and stalled the offense during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +27.0
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 23.7m
9
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.0

A surprisingly negative total rating despite solid shooting efficiency points to severe off-ball defensive breakdowns. Getting consistently beat in transition and failing to secure the defensive glass allowed the opponent to feast on second-chance opportunities.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +33.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Chet Holmgren 20.5m
13
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.1

Despite efficient finishing around the basket, the negative impact stems from poor rotational awareness that gave up high-value looks in the paint. His inability to string together stops during crucial stretches erased the value he provided on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.7%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg +39.6
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Williams 19.6m
28
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+26.2

Offensive dominance drove the massive positive score, highlighted by near-perfect shot selection that punished defensive rotations. Breaking out of a recent slump, his ability to score at will without wasting possessions completely overwhelmed the opponent.

Shooting
FG 11/12 (91.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 98.6%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg +42.7
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +27.0
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.4

Flawless execution as a connective hub in the half-court offense elevated his overall rating. By finishing every look at the rim and facilitating out of the high post, he generated high-quality possessions without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.1%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +55.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+2.8

Elite defensive positioning and active hands fueled a positive rating despite a rough night shooting from deep. Executing flawless rotations and anchoring the paint completely masked his offensive struggles.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +23.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +1.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
12
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.8

High-level defensive disruption and hustle plays kept his head above water despite a high volume of missed mid-range pull-ups. The aggressive shot profile yielded diminishing returns, but his relentless perimeter pressure prevented a negative slide.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.2%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +6.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.1

A massive, unexpected scoring surge completely flipped his usual impact profile. Capitalizing on defensive breakdowns, his aggressive cuts and timely perimeter makes provided a crucial spark that swung the momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.4%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +11.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jared McCain 22.3m
12
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.7

Opportunistic scoring and surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense drove a solid positive impact. He consistently blew up pick-and-roll actions, turning defensive stops into efficient transition buckets.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg +20.5
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +4.1
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Isaiah Joe 18.1m
21
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.4

Lethal floor spacing was the sole driver of this highly positive performance. Punishing drop coverage with a barrage of deep perimeter makes forced the defense to overextend, opening up the floor for everyone else.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 6/8 (75.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +21.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +17.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Forced perimeter shots in a short rotational window dragged down his overall rating. Settling for contested looks early in the shot clock wasted valuable possessions and handed momentum back to the opponent.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.6

Complete offensive invisibility during a brief stint rendered his minutes a net negative. Failing to attempt quality shots or generate any downhill pressure allowed the defense to rest while he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg +67.9
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0