GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
28
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
+14.1

Surgical precision on offense drove an astronomical box rating (+21.2). Strong defensive metrics (+6.5) proved he was highly engaged on both ends, systematically dismantling his matchups.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.8%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +68.1
+/- +43
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Offense +21.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +6.5
Raw total +30.2
Avg player in 26.8m -16.1
Impact +14.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 4
S Chet Holmgren 24.6m
24
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+21.7

Absolute dominance on both ends was highlighted by a staggering defensive rating (+11.0) that completely deterred interior challenges. Flawless perimeter execution and elite shot-making compounded the massive overall impact.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 4/4 (100.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 83.8%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +59.3
+/- +33
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Offense +23.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +11.0
Raw total +36.5
Avg player in 24.6m -14.8
Impact +21.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Jalen Williams 22.8m
15
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.2

Relentless hustle plays (+4.2) and high-level defensive activity set the tone for this outing. Efficient shot selection ensured that his two-way energy translated directly into positive momentum.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.8%
USG% 22.8%
Net Rtg +59.3
+/- +32
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Offense +9.1
Hustle +4.2
Defense +4.5
Raw total +17.8
Avg player in 22.8m -13.6
Impact +4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Luguentz Dort 21.7m
12
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.6

A significant scoring bump fueled by efficient perimeter shooting drove a strong box rating. However, relatively muted defensive metrics (+1.0) kept his overall impact from reaching elite territory.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.1%
USG% 15.1%
Net Rtg +74.5
+/- +38
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Offense +11.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.0
Raw total +13.6
Avg player in 21.7m -13.0
Impact +0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 18.6m
9
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.3

Suffocating point-of-attack defense (+9.2) and elite hustle metrics (+4.5) defined this stellar performance. He punished defensive rotations by maximizing his offensive touches with near-perfect efficiency.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +85.7
+/- +36
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.6m
Offense +9.7
Hustle +4.5
Defense +9.2
Raw total +23.4
Avg player in 18.6m -11.1
Impact +12.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.2

Snapping a four-game streak of high-efficiency shooting, a pattern of clanked jumpers dragged his rating into the red. Elite hustle metrics (+4.7) couldn't salvage the damage done by the empty offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +34.3
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Offense -1.0
Hustle +4.7
Defense +3.2
Raw total +6.9
Avg player in 21.8m -13.1
Impact -6.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
-1.7

Passing up open looks stalled offensive flow during his minutes, leading to a severe drop in scoring. Solid defensive positioning couldn't salvage the lack of offensive assertiveness.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 6.4%
Net Rtg +37.9
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.4m
Offense +6.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +2.9
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 21.4m -12.8
Impact -1.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.1

High-level defensive execution (+5.8) and active hustle plays (+3.1) anchored a strong two-way shift. Efficient finishing on his limited attempts ensured he maximized his time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +19.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Offense +7.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense +5.8
Raw total +16.3
Avg player in 18.7m -11.2
Impact +5.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.8

Poor shot selection and a pattern of missed perimeter looks heavily weighed down his overall impact. Marginal defensive contributions weren't enough to offset the offensive inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Offense -2.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.2
Raw total +0.5
Avg player in 17.2m -10.3
Impact -9.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Alex Caruso 12.8m
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.2

Elite defensive disruption (+7.2) and relentless hustle completely overshadowed a quiet offensive night. His ability to blow up opposing actions made him a net positive despite the lack of scoring gravity.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -16.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense +7.2
Raw total +10.8
Avg player in 12.8m -7.6
Impact +3.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.9

A shocking offensive explosion defined this flawless shooting performance. Capitalizing on every single touch generated massive value in a short burst of playing time.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 110.0%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +56.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense +11.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.5
Raw total +13.1
Avg player in 12.0m -7.2
Impact +5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
11
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.6

Lethal execution from beyond the arc drove a strong box rating despite a dip in his usual overall volume. The lack of defensive impact (+0.7) was easily masked by his highly efficient perimeter shooting.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 91.7%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +56.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense +9.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.7
Raw total +11.8
Avg player in 12.0m -7.2
Impact +4.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.2

Negative defensive metrics (-0.5) and a lack of hustle plays doomed this brief stint. Halving his usual scoring output while failing to generate stops made him a liability on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.6m
Offense +1.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense -0.5
Raw total +1.5
Avg player in 9.6m -5.7
Impact -4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Royce O'Neale 26.4m
4
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-19.2

Cratering offensive gravity defined this performance, as his inability to connect from deep allowed defenders to sag off. Elite defensive metrics (+5.0) were entirely wasted by the empty possessions on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -57.1
+/- -34
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Offense -9.1
Hustle +0.8
Defense +5.0
Raw total -3.3
Avg player in 26.4m -15.9
Impact -19.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 81.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Dillon Brooks 26.3m
16
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.0

A pattern of forced, low-quality looks—resulting in 12 missed shots—completely cratered his overall impact. The scoring bump was purely a mirage of volume that masked severe offensive inefficiency.

Shooting
FG 4/16 (25.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 41.9%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg -74.6
+/- -47
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Offense +6.1
Hustle +1.0
Defense +1.6
Raw total +8.7
Avg player in 26.3m -15.7
Impact -7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.2

Suffocating point-of-attack defense (+9.5) was completely undone by a pattern of offensive ineptitude. Generating zero perimeter gravity allowed the opposition to clog the paint, stalling the entire unit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -33.9
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Offense -6.0
Hustle +3.6
Defense +9.5
Raw total +7.1
Avg player in 25.6m -15.3
Impact -8.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 4
S Grayson Allen 21.9m
10
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.8

A brutal stretch of perimeter bricklaying dragged his rating into the red. The sharp drop in scoring efficiency negated his otherwise solid hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 19.3%
Net Rtg -78.9
+/- -41
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Offense +6.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +1.1
Raw total +9.3
Avg player in 21.9m -13.1
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mark Williams 19.0m
9
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.7

Interior deterrence set the tone during his shift, anchoring a highly positive defensive rating (+5.4). He didn't force action on offense, instead letting his rim protection dictate his overall value.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -70.0
+/- -30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Offense +7.0
Hustle +2.6
Defense +5.4
Raw total +15.0
Avg player in 19.0m -11.3
Impact +3.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+1.5

A massive offensive breakout drove an elite box score rating. Efficient shot selection and strong point-of-attack defense (+4.9) solidified a highly impactful two-way shift.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.8%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -13.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +10.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.9
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 28.2m -16.8
Impact +1.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Oso Ighodaro 19.1m
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.4

Snapping a five-game streak of elite efficiency, his missed interior looks dragged his overall impact down. Solid hustle numbers weren't enough to offset the uncharacteristic struggles around the basket.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -7.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Offense +4.9
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.7
Raw total +8.0
Avg player in 19.1m -11.4
Impact -3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.5

An explosive pattern of aggressive shot creation completely flipped the momentum while he was on the floor. Combined with disruptive defensive metrics (+4.6), his downhill pressure dictated the game's tempo.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 29.8%
Net Rtg -25.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.9m
Offense +8.5
Hustle +2.8
Defense +4.6
Raw total +15.9
Avg player in 18.9m -11.4
Impact +4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Ryan Dunn 16.2m
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.7

Passive offensive positioning defined his minutes, halving his usual scoring output and making him a non-factor on that end. Strong defensive activity (+3.1) couldn't compensate for essentially playing 4-on-5 offensively.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -49.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense -1.3
Hustle +3.3
Defense +3.1
Raw total +5.1
Avg player in 16.2m -9.8
Impact -4.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

A completely flat performance defined by missed perimeter looks and negligible defensive resistance. The lack of hustle plays or offensive gravity made him a liability during his rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -56.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense -1.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.7
Avg player in 12.0m -7.2
Impact -7.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.0

Capitalizing on his limited touches maximized his value without forcing bad shots. Efficient finishing and solid defensive positioning (+2.8) anchored a highly productive short shift.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg -17.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.6m
Offense +5.3
Hustle +0.7
Defense +2.8
Raw total +8.8
Avg player in 9.6m -5.8
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.4

Marginal defensive contributions were offset by a sharp decline in offensive production. The inability to finish his limited looks kept him from making a meaningful dent in the game.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg -17.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.6m
Offense +0.8
Hustle +1.4
Defense +2.0
Raw total +4.2
Avg player in 9.6m -5.6
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.8

Complete offensive invisibility—failing to log a single shot attempt—rendered his brief stint entirely empty. Without generating any rim pressure or defensive deterrence, his minutes were a net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -64.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Offense -3.1
Hustle +0.7
Defense 0.0
Raw total -2.4
Avg player in 7.2m -4.4
Impact -6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2