PHX

2025-26 Season

JAMAREE BOUYEA

Phoenix Suns | Guard | 6-2
Jamaree Bouyea
5.5 PPG
1.8 RPG
1.6 APG
13.6 MPG
+0.1 Impact

Bouyea produces at an average rate for a 14-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.1
Scoring +3.1
Points 5.5 PPG × +1.00 = +5.5
Missed 2PT 1.5/g × -0.78 = -1.2
Missed 3PT 1.1/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.3
Assists 1.6/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 0.4/g × +1.26 = +0.5
Turnovers -1.0
Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0
Defense +0.4
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 1.3/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.5
Contested Shots 1.7/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 1.4/g × +0.65 = +0.9
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +5.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.2
Net Impact
+0.1
71st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
6.5 PPG
Efficiency 33th
52.2% TS
Playmaking 33th
1.9 APG
Rebounding 23th
2.1 RPG
Rim Protection 86th
0.17/min
Hustle 69th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 74th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jamaree Bouyea spent his first twenty games operating as the ultimate chaotic wildcard off the bench, oscillating between brilliant offensive sparks and disastrous, empty possessions. When his shot was falling, he could completely tilt the floor, like when he dropped 18 points on 12/31 vs CLE to generate a massive +12.6 impact score via decisive rim attacks. He could also occasionally salvage quiet offensive nights by locking in on the other end of the hardwood. Despite scoring just 5 points on 12/20 vs GSW, he posted a +2.1 impact because his smothering perimeter defense completely disrupted the opposing backcourt. However, hidden costs frequently dragged down his overall effectiveness even when he found the bottom of the net. During a 24-minute stint on 01/27 vs BKN, Bouyea managed 10 points but still recorded a -4.6 impact because poor decision-making in transition routinely killed his team's momentum. To survive in a competitive NBA rotation, he has to stop bleeding value through these erratic choices.

Extreme volatility defined Jamaree Bouyea's mid-season reserve minutes, as he wildly oscillated between defensive catalyst and offensive black hole. Even when he managed to find the basket, hidden costs often dragged down his overall value. Take his 02/11 vs OKC performance, where a stretch-high 11 points resulted in a -3.1 impact score because a heavy volume of missed shots completely outweighed his hustle. Conversely, he generated real value without needing heavy scoring volume on 02/22 vs POR. Despite tallying just 8 points in 21 minutes, his aggressive point-of-attack defense and relentless effort sparked the second unit to a +3.6 impact. Yet, these gritty bright spots were constantly interrupted by brutal offensive droughts. Look no further than the disastrous 02/03 vs POR outing, where total offensive invisibility yielded a catastrophic -10.8 impact in 15 minutes of aimless court time.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Bouyea's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Bouyea locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +1.4, second-half: -1.2. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 54 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Reaves 34.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 11
I. Joe 31.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
A. Mitchell 21.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
P. Pritchard 20.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Proctor 19.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 6
K. Williams 18.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 6
D. Jenkins 17.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
R. Westbrook 17.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Smart 16.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1
A. Wiggins 14.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Reaves 27.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Mitchell 23.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
I. Joe 23.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
R. Westbrook 19.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 7
T. Proctor 18.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
A. Wiggins 18.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 9
V. Krejčí 17.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Jenkins 17.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Richard 17.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Saraf 16.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

42
Games
5.5
PPG
1.8
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
46.6
FG%
29.9
3P%
71.0
FT%
13.6
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played