GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Max Christie 34.1m
12
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
-7.9

Hemorrhaged value on the defensive end by consistently dying on screens and losing his man off the ball. Even with a respectable shooting performance, his inability to contain dribble penetration created cascading breakdowns that tanked his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 12.6%
Net Rtg +4.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Offense +8.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.9
Raw total +12.2
Avg player in 34.1m -20.1
Impact -7.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Cooper Flagg 33.7m
16
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
-3.5

A stark drop in scoring efficiency and forced isolation attempts severely dragged down his offensive value. While his weak-side shot-blocking and overall defensive metrics remained elite, his wasted possessions in the half-court ultimately hurt the team's net rating.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.7%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -13.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Offense +2.0
Hustle +5.2
Defense +9.1
Raw total +16.3
Avg player in 33.7m -19.8
Impact -3.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 4
17
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+3.0

Dictated the tempo flawlessly, weaving through traffic to create high-value looks for teammates. His exceptional point-of-attack defense disrupted the opponent's offensive flow, cementing a highly productive two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.4%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +14.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Offense +10.5
Hustle +3.6
Defense +8.4
Raw total +22.5
Avg player in 33.2m -19.5
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 4
S Daniel Gafford 26.6m
15
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.5

Anchored the interior masterfully by erasing mistakes at the rim and finishing everything thrown his way. His massive defensive impact was highlighted by his ability to seamlessly switch onto guards late in the shot clock without fouling.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.5%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +1.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Offense +10.8
Hustle +3.6
Defense +9.7
Raw total +24.1
Avg player in 26.6m -15.6
Impact +8.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
6
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.0

Completely tilted the floor during a microscopic stint by attacking mismatches in the post. His immediate defensive physicality and quick-decision scoring provided an electric, albeit brief, jolt to the lineup.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +75.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.4m
Offense +4.2
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.5
Raw total +9.1
Avg player in 5.4m -3.1
Impact +6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
19
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.1

Cratered his overall impact by forcing a staggering number of contested perimeter shots, completely ignoring the flow of the offense. While he hit enough to boost his raw scoring, the sheer volume of empty possessions and a lack of secondary hustle plays severely damaged the team's efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 6/16 (37.5%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg -14.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Offense +8.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.1
Raw total +10.0
Avg player in 30.7m -18.1
Impact -8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.7

Struggled to find his rhythm within the flow of the offense, often stalling possessions with indecisive ball-handling. His lack of off-ball movement allowed the defense to rest, negating the value of his occasional efficient finishes.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -39.0
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Offense +7.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +2.0
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 26.1m -15.4
Impact -2.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Moussa Cisse 14.8m
4
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.2

Dominated the glass and altered multiple shots during a highly energetic rotation stint. His commitment to doing the dirty work—setting hard screens and contesting vertically—drove a massive positive swing in a short window.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +29.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Offense +6.1
Hustle +3.3
Defense +4.6
Raw total +14.0
Avg player in 14.8m -8.8
Impact +5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 2
5
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.2

Short-circuited the offense with a string of heavily contested, early-clock three-pointers that fueled opponent transition opportunities. His lack of rim pressure made the attack entirely one-dimensional and easy to guard.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -60.5
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Offense +0.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense +2.1
Raw total +4.2
Avg player in 14.3m -8.4
Impact -4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaden Hardy 12.1m
8
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.8

Bleed value on the defensive end by repeatedly getting blown by in isolation matchups. His efficient spot-up shooting was entirely undone by his inability to stay in front of his man or contribute on the glass.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -6.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +0.2
Defense -0.1
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 12.1m -7.1
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.1

Was a complete non-factor offensively and looked a step slow on defensive rotations. Failed to generate a single hustle play, allowing opponents to exploit his side of the floor during his brief appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg -86.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.0m
Offense +1.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.5
Raw total +1.0
Avg player in 7.0m -4.1
Impact -3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.4

Logged a mere handful of seconds at the end of a quarter, primarily serving as a situational body. Did not have enough runway to influence the game in either direction.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -50.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +1.5
Avg player in 1.8m -1.1
Impact +0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 38.4m
26
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
+1.1

Overcame a brutal shooting night by leaning heavily into his playmaking and defensive engagement. While clanking multiple contested pull-ups, he salvaged his net impact by jumping passing lanes and maintaining high-intensity point-of-attack pressure.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 12/13 (92.3%)
Advanced
TS% 52.6%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg +8.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.4m
Offense +11.6
Hustle +6.7
Defense +5.5
Raw total +23.8
Avg player in 38.4m -22.7
Impact +1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Grayson Allen 32.9m
23
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.5

Broke out of a recent shooting slump by hunting transition threes and attacking closeouts with aggression. His surprisingly robust defensive metrics were driven by excellent screen navigation and timely digs on driving ball-handlers.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.3%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg +2.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Offense +13.4
Hustle +3.9
Defense +8.6
Raw total +25.9
Avg player in 32.9m -19.4
Impact +6.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 31.0m
18
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.1

Despite an aggressive offensive mindset that yielded a higher scoring output than usual, his overall impact flatlined due to erratic shot selection inside the arc. He surrendered too many driving lanes on the perimeter, neutralizing the value of his spot-up shooting.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.7%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -7.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Offense +13.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.8
Raw total +18.2
Avg player in 31.0m -18.3
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Royce O'Neale 27.5m
13
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-2.7

Highly efficient from deep, yet his overall footprint dipped into the negative because of sluggish transition recoveries. A lack of secondary hustle plays and loose ball recoveries limited his ability to swing momentum during crucial stretches.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 82.5%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg -18.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Offense +8.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.2
Raw total +13.5
Avg player in 27.5m -16.2
Impact -2.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mark Williams 26.3m
10
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.7

Completely controlled the paint through relentless rim-running and high-level rim protection. His massive hustle metrics reflect a dominant effort in generating second-chance opportunities and altering shots as a weak-side helper.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Offense +12.4
Hustle +6.7
Defense +6.1
Raw total +25.2
Avg player in 26.3m -15.5
Impact +9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
Ryan Dunn 23.6m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.5

Provided a steadying presence on the wing with disciplined closeouts and active hands in the passing lanes. Missed opportunities on spot-up attempts capped his ceiling, but his baseline defensive reliability kept the lineup afloat.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +26.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +7.5
Hustle +3.6
Defense +3.3
Raw total +14.4
Avg player in 23.6m -13.9
Impact +0.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.5

Punished drop coverage by confidently stepping into pull-up jumpers, providing a massive spark off the bench. His ability to consistently break the paint and collapse the defense drove a highly efficient offensive stretch.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +42.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Offense +12.9
Hustle +1.7
Defense +1.6
Raw total +16.2
Avg player in 20.0m -11.7
Impact +4.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.8

Bogged down the half-court offense with hesitant decision-making and poor execution on drive-and-kick reads. Struggled to stay in front of quicker guards, compounding his offensive inefficiency with defensive breakdowns.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg +36.8
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Offense +3.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense +2.6
Raw total +7.5
Avg player in 19.1m -11.3
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 11.7m
2
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Failed to establish any offensive rhythm, looking lost during short-roll situations. Despite decent positional defense, his inability to secure contested defensive rebounds allowed opponents to extend crucial possessions.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Offense -0.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +2.4
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 11.7m -6.9
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.4

Maximized a brief rotation stint by setting bruising screens and rolling with purpose. His vertical gravity forced weak-side tags, opening up the perimeter even when he didn't touch the ball.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.5m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.0
Raw total +8.0
Avg player in 9.5m -5.6
Impact +2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1