PHX

2025-26 Season

MARK WILLIAMS

Phoenix Suns | Center | 7-1
Mark Williams
11.5PPG
7.9RPG
1.0APG
23.6MPG
+8.5 Impact

Williams produces at an elite rate for a 24-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+8.5
Scoring +10.6
Points Scored 11.5 PPG = +11.5
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.9
Assists & Self-Creation 1.0 AST/g + self-creation = +0.9
Turnovers -2.6
Turnovers 1.1/g (live + dead blend) = -2.6
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.9/g = +2.1
Blocks 1.0/g = +0.9
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.5
Hustle & Effort +8.6
Rebounds 7.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +4.7
Contested Shots 7.8/g = +1.6
Deflections 2.1/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 2.3/g = +0.7
Raw Impact +18.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5
Net Impact
+8.5
78th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 65th
11.5 PPG
Efficiency 87th
66.2% TS
Playmaking 28th
1.0 APG
Rebounding 74th
7.9 RPG
Defense 70th
+7.8/g
Hustle 69th
+20.3/g
Creation 72th
+3.08/g
Shot Making 39th
+3.82/g
TO Discipline 64th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

This 21-game stretch was defined by Mark Williams forcing a permanent role change from rotational big to indispensable starting anchor. He battered his way out of the second unit on 10/27 vs UTA, pouring in 25 points and 11 rebounds on 9-of-14 shooting to generate a massive +23.0 Impact score. The coaching staff immediately inserted him into the starting five for the next matchup on 10/30 vs MEM, where he rewarded them with 20 points, 12 boards, and a staggering +29.0 Impact mark. His towering analytical footprint stems from hyper-efficient interior finishing and relentless rebounding rather than high usage. Even when his offensive touches completely vanished, he still found ways to tilt the floor. Look at the 11/11 vs NOP slugfest; he attempted just a single shot and scored only 2 points, yet still scraped out a +1.1 Impact score by battling for seven rebounds and providing crucial defensive resistance in the paint. He is simply doing all the dirty work necessary to win basketball games.

Mark Williams spent this midseason stretch establishing himself as an absolute menace in the paint, thriving through ruthless efficiency rather than sheer volume. His peak arrived on 12/27 vs NOP. He battered the interior for 24 points and 13 rebounds on 9-of-13 shooting, generating a massive +23.4 Impact score through relentless paint positioning and physical stops. Even when his touches vanished, he found ways to dictate the flow of the game. During the 01/08 vs MEM matchup, he attempted just six shots for 12 points, yet his active rim deterrence and 12 hard-fought rebounds yielded a stellar +18.1 Impact score. However, his effectiveness plummeted when opponents successfully neutralized his hustle. Look at the 12/31 vs CLE contest, where he missed all three of his shot attempts and finished with a -2.0 Impact score because his total lack of scoring gravity stalled out the half-court offense. When engaged as a primary lob threat and glass-cleaner, Williams is a terrifying matchup, but his quiet nights reveal a big man who still occasionally disappears against stout defensive fronts.

Mark Williams defined this twenty-game stretch with extreme peaks of hyper-efficient interior dominance interrupted by brief bouts of passivity. On 01/28 vs BKN, he eviscerated the defense for 27 points on blistering 13-of-16 shooting, generating a massive +26.5 impact score purely through unstoppable rim finishing. Yet, the big man does not always need to fill the scoring column to alter a game's geometry. During an inefficient 11-point, 4-of-12 shooting night on 02/19 vs SAS, he still managed a +10.0 impact because his unrelenting effort on the glass secured 10 crucial rebounds. Conversely, when his motor stalls and he fails to anchor the paint, his overall value plummets. Just look at his outing on 02/11 vs OKC, where he grabbed a measly single rebound in 16 minutes, dragging his impact down to -3.9 despite missing only one shot all night.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Williams posts positive impact in 80% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 82% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Williams consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +11.1, second-half: +6.1. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 15 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Zubac 119.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 24
D. Ayton 110.0 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 25
C. Holmgren 94.4 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 12
M. Raynaud 79.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 11
B. Adebayo 75.1 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
J. Allen 64.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
J. Duren 63.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
D. Clingan 61.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 17
O. Okongwu 60.8 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 10
Q. Post 59.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

I. Zubac 121.6 poss
FG% 76.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 38
D. Ayton 102.4 poss
FG% 81.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 34
M. Raynaud 79.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
B. Adebayo 74.9 poss
FG% 57.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 35
J. Allen 73.5 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 16
N. Claxton 70.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 11
J. Duren 63.1 poss
FG% 70.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 26
W. Kessler 62.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
D. Clingan 62.8 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 18
R. Gobert 57.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13

SEASON STATS

61
Games
11.5
PPG
7.9
RPG
1.0
APG
0.9
SPG
1.0
BPG
64.4
FG%
100.0
3P%
77.1
FT%
23.6
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played