Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead PHI lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHI 2P — 3P —
PHX 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 157 attempts

PHI PHI Shot-making Δ

Maxey Hard 8/21 0.0
Embiid Hard 9/19 +4.6
Oubre Jr. 6/14 -1.6
Edgecombe Hard 2/4 +1.0
Barlow Open 3/4 +0.7
Watford 2/4 -0.5
Grimes Open 2/4 -1.3
Bona Open 2/3 -0.2
Edwards Open 1/1 +0.6

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Brooks Hard 11/23 +1.0
Booker Hard 5/12 0.0
Gillespie Hard 2/11 -4.7
O'Neale Hard 5/10 +6.3
Williams Open 4/7 -1.2
Goodwin 2/7 -2.5
Green 2/6 -2.3
Dunn Hard 1/5 -2.3
Ighodaro Open 1/2 -0.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHI
PHX
35/74 Field Goals 33/83
47.3% Field Goal % 39.8%
11/29 3-Pointers 11/46
37.9% 3-Point % 23.9%
28/34 Free Throws 26/31
82.4% Free Throw % 83.9%
61.3% True Shooting % 53.3%
56 Total Rebounds 44
11 Offensive 12
39 Defensive 28
18 Assists 22
1.00 Assist/TO Ratio 1.57
17 Turnovers 12
5 Steals 8
4 Blocks 0
25 Fouls 23
34 Points in Paint 34
14 Fast Break Pts 7
13 Points off TOs 15
11 Second Chance Pts 9
18 Bench Points 23
19 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Joel Embiid
33 PTS · 9 REB · 3 AST · 33.0 MIN
+22.8
2
Dillon Brooks
28 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 35.8 MIN
+19.74
3
Tyrese Maxey
29 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 39.8 MIN
+17.83
4
Mark Williams
11 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 30.7 MIN
+15.23
5
Royce O'Neale
14 PTS · 11 REB · 3 AST · 33.6 MIN
+14.79
6
Kelly Oubre Jr.
18 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 38.2 MIN
+14.75
7
Devin Booker
21 PTS · 2 REB · 9 AST · 32.1 MIN
+7.52
8
Adem Bona
4 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 14.8 MIN
+6.16
9
Jalen Green
8 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 16.7 MIN
+5.04
10
Jordan Goodwin
7 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 27.0 MIN
+4.9
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:11 R. O'Neale bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (3 TO) 109–103
Q4 0:11 T. Maxey Free Throw 2 of 2 (29 PTS) 109–103
Q4 0:11 T. Maxey Free Throw 1 of 2 (28 PTS) 108–103
Q4 0:11 C. Gillespie personal FOUL (2 PF) (Maxey 2 FT) 107–103
Q4 0:16 D. Booker Free Throw 3 of 3 (21 PTS) 107–103
Q4 0:16 D. Booker Free Throw 2 of 3 (20 PTS) 107–102
Q4 0:16 D. Booker Free Throw 1 of 3 (19 PTS) 107–101
Q4 0:16 K. Oubre Jr. shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (Booker 3 FT) 107–100
Q4 0:17 T. Maxey Free Throw 3 of 3 (27 PTS) 107–100
Q4 0:17 T. Maxey Free Throw 2 of 3 (26 PTS) 106–100
Q4 0:17 T. Maxey Free Throw 1 of 3 (25 PTS) 105–100
Q4 0:17 TEAM delay-of-game VIOLATION 104–100
Q4 0:17 D. Booker shooting personal FOUL (5 PF) (Maxey 3 FT) 104–100
Q4 0:41 D. Booker Free Throw 3 of 3 (18 PTS) 104–100
Q4 0:41 D. Booker Free Throw 2 of 3 (17 PTS) 104–99

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Dillon Brooks 35.8m
28
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+17.6

An aggressive, high-usage scoring explosion drove his massive box impact, more than doubling his usual offensive output. While his perimeter jumper was erratic, relentless driving and mid-range shot creation overpowered a slightly negative defensive rating.

Shooting
FG 11/23 (47.8%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.5%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +15.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.8m
Scoring +19.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Royce O'Neale 33.6m
14
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.3

A quintessential 3-and-D masterclass fueled an excellent +6.5 total impact. Elite hustle (+5.2) and lockdown perimeter defense (+5.3) paired perfectly with timely floor-spacing to swing the momentum whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +8.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +13.0
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Devin Booker 32.1m
21
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
-2.9

Poor shot selection from beyond the arc suppressed his usual elite scoring impact. However, he salvaged a positive overall rating by shifting into a facilitator role and utilizing active hands (+4.8 Hustle) to create transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 62.4%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg +13.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -5.6
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Mark Williams 30.7m
11
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.2

Absolute dominance in the paint anchored a staggering +9.9 defensive impact score. He controlled the restricted area defensively while generating crucial extra possessions through high-motor hustle plays (+3.1).

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.8%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +1.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +9.1
Defense +0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.8

Disastrous perimeter shooting completely tanked his offensive value, as he forced contested looks from deep. Miraculously, off-the-charts hustle (+9.0) and tenacious on-ball defense (+4.7) nearly erased the offensive damage.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 27.3%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg -42.6
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

Gritty effort plays (+6.2 Hustle) salvaged a night where his jumper completely abandoned him. By focusing on loose balls and dirty work, he managed to carve out a positive impact despite struggling to finish at the rim.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -6.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 17.0m
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

A stark drop in usage broke his recent streak of efficient interior scoring, making him an offensive non-factor. Even with solid positional defense (+2.2 Def), his inability to pressure the rim offensively resulted in a negative net score.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -14.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jalen Green 16.7m
8
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.9

A sharp decline in offensive aggression rendered him largely ineffective during his minutes. Failing to register a single hustle play highlighted a lack of engagement that dragged his net impact into the negative.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +25.5
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Ryan Dunn 10.6m
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

Rushed shot selection in limited minutes quickly torpedoed his offensive value. Lacking his usual defensive sharpness (-0.4 Def), he failed to find a rhythm and bled value while on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -47.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

Total offensive passivity doomed his short stint, as he failed to attempt a single shot from the field. While he showed flashes of defensive competence (+1.3 Def), the complete lack of scoring gravity made him a net negative.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -80.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
PHI Philadelphia 76ers
S Tyrese Maxey 39.8m
29
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+19.2

High-volume shot creation kept the offense afloat, even though perimeter struggles dragged down his overall efficiency. Surprisingly, it was his disruptive point-of-attack defense (+5.9 Def) that truly salvaged his net impact and kept him highly positive.

Shooting
FG 8/21 (38.1%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 56.1%
USG% 31.5%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.8m
Scoring +18.9
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +2.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kelly Oubre Jr. 38.2m
18
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.8

Elevated scoring volume drove a positive offensive impact, as he stepped up as a primary option with a significant scoring bump over his recent average. His perimeter shot-making kept the floor spaced, while active defensive rotations (+4.5 Def) ensured his overall net rating stayed firmly in the green.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg -3.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Joel Embiid 33.0m
33
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+27.9

Total dominance as a floor-stretching big fueled a massive +11.4 net impact. His willingness to step out and hit from deep punished drop coverages, while steady rim protection (+2.4 Def) anchored the team on the other end.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 11/13 (84.6%)
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 34.6%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +25.5
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +10.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S VJ Edgecombe 25.2m
5
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.2

A drastic drop in scoring aggression severely limited his overall effectiveness, as he passed up looks he normally takes. Though he contributed solid hustle plays (+2.9), the lack of offensive gravity resulted in a negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -9.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dominick Barlow 17.6m
6
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

Despite maintaining his highly efficient interior finishing streak, limited overall involvement capped his offensive ceiling. A slight negative defensive impact (-0.2) combined with low usage ultimately dragged his net score into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.6%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +13.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +4.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.7

A severe lack of offensive assertiveness ruined his impact score, breaking a recent streak of efficient scoring nights. Compounding the low volume was a step slow on defensive closeouts (-1.2 Def), making him a net negative across his minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.8

Defensive versatility and strong rotational awareness (+3.3 Def) were the bright spots in an otherwise quiet outing. However, a passive offensive approach allowed defenders to sag off, stalling team spacing and resulting in a poor net score.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -9.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Practically invisible on the offensive end, his refusal to hunt shots cratered his value. He managed to provide decent weak-side help defense (+2.5 Def), but it was nowhere near enough to overcome the offensive void.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.1%
Net Rtg +42.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Adem Bona 14.8m
4
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

Elite rim deterrence (+4.2 Def) defined this brief but highly effective stint. He played perfectly within his role, finishing dump-offs efficiently while anchoring the paint to generate a solid positive impact.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +61.5
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +4.4
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2