Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead DAL lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DAL 2P — 3P —
PHX 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 180 attempts

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Flagg 4/18 -12.4
Poulakidas Hard 8/12 +10.1
Bagley III Hard 8/11 +7.9
Christie Hard 5/11 +3.5
Johnson Open 1/11 -11.5
Nembhard 4/9 -1.2
Cisse Open 4/5 +1.5
Powell Open 2/5 -2.0
Middleton Hard 0/5 -4.6
Smith Hard 1/2 +0.8

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Booker 13/27 +0.1
Brooks 11/22 +3.7
Gillespie Hard 5/12 -0.8
O'Neale Hard 5/7 +6.8
Goodwin 3/7 +1.4
Maluach Open 2/5 -2.5
Ighodaro Open 2/3 -0.2
Dunn Hard 0/3 -3.3
Fleming 1/2 -0.5
Green Hard 0/2 -1.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DAL
PHX
37/89 Field Goals 42/91
41.6% Field Goal % 46.2%
13/36 3-Pointers 14/35
36.1% 3-Point % 40.0%
20/22 Free Throws 14/17
90.9% Free Throw % 82.4%
54.2% True Shooting % 56.9%
54 Total Rebounds 52
10 Offensive 12
33 Defensive 34
27 Assists 20
2.25 Assist/TO Ratio 2.00
8 Turnovers 10
4 Steals 5
5 Blocks 8
14 Fouls 16
38 Points in Paint 40
7 Fast Break Pts 7
6 Points off TOs 16
15 Second Chance Pts 13
45 Bench Points 34
3 Largest Lead 18
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Devin Booker
37 PTS · 5 REB · 9 AST · 37.0 MIN
+24.29
2
Dillon Brooks
28 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 33.4 MIN
+22.8
3
Marvin Bagley III
20 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 26.3 MIN
+19.13
4
John Poulakidas
23 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 29.3 MIN
+18.29
5
Max Christie
18 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 32.8 MIN
+17.65
6
Royce O'Neale
14 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 23.2 MIN
+15.07
7
Moussa Cisse
11 PTS · 9 REB · 0 AST · 21.7 MIN
+13.01
8
Jordan Goodwin
9 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 13.1 MIN
+11.4
9
Khaman Maluach
4 PTS · 14 REB · 0 AST · 30.2 MIN
+9.85
10
Collin Gillespie
13 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 33.8 MIN
+9.11
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:13 DAL 5-second-violation Team TURNOVER 107–112
Q4 0:13 D. Brooks driving Layup (28 PTS) 107–112
Q4 0:28 R. Dunn STEAL (1 STL) 107–110
Q4 0:28 M. Cisse bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 107–110
Q4 0:29 M. Cisse REBOUND (Off:3 Def:6) 107–110
Q4 0:33 O. Ighodaro BLOCK (2 BLK) 107–110
Q4 0:33 MISS M. Cisse cutting Layup - blocked 107–110
Q4 0:36 D. Booker personal FOUL (2 PF) 107–110
Q4 0:43 M. Cisse REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 107–110
Q4 0:47 MISS R. Dunn 3PT 107–110
Q4 1:08 J. Poulakidas 27' 3PT step back (23 PTS) (D. Powell 3 AST) 107–110
Q4 1:13 D. Booker 25' 3PT pullup (37 PTS) (D. Brooks 3 AST) 104–110
Q4 1:32 M. Cisse tip Layup (11 PTS) 104–107
Q4 1:32 M. Cisse REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 102–107
Q4 1:33 MISS A. Johnson tip Layup 102–107

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 37.0m
37
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+24.2

Serving as the primary engine, his ability to generate points both for himself and his teammates overwhelmed the defense. Elite shot creation and high-level playmaking fueled a massive offensive rating, continuing his trend of elite production. The sheer volume of his offensive output easily outweighed any minor inefficiencies in his shooting splits.

Shooting
FG 13/27 (48.1%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.8%
USG% 37.9%
Net Rtg +16.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +26.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -8.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Dillon Brooks 33.4m
28
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+24.5

Breaking out of a recent slump, his ability to create and convert looks carried the offensive load. Aggressive, high-volume scoring paired with lethal three-point shooting drove a stellar impact rating. A strong defensive showing (+3.1) complemented his scoring outburst, making this a complete two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 11/22 (50.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +9.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +19.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Khaman Maluach 30.2m
4
pts
14
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.2

Despite minimal offensive involvement, his ability to clean the glass and anchor the defense (+5.8) heavily influenced the game's flow. Dominant rebounding and rim deterrence were the sole drivers of his positive value. His hustle plays (+3.8) generated crucial extra possessions that offset his lack of scoring.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 6.8%
Net Rtg +21.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +16.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Jordan Goodwin 13.1m
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.1

Hitting multiple triples maximized his value during a short stint, punishing defensive closeouts. Deep-range accuracy in limited minutes provided a sharp boost to his team's offensive efficiency, extending his streak of highly efficient shooting games. Solid defensive metrics (+2.6) ensured he was a two-way contributor while on the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.1m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jalen Green 3.8m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.6

Missing his only attempts in less than four minutes of action provided no offensive value, a stark contrast to his recent scoring punch. A brief, scoreless stint resulted in a quick negative impact before he exited the game. The lack of court time prevented him from establishing any rhythm or contributing meaningfully.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.5

Bricking a high volume of attempts from beyond the arc stalled out multiple offensive sets, severely hurting his net rating. Poor perimeter execution dragged down an otherwise active performance. The negative impact of his missed threes overshadowed his solid rebounding and hustle contributions.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +7.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -3.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Ryan Dunn 24.4m
0
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.2

Failing to score a single point created a severe spacing issue that bogged down the team's half-court execution. A completely barren offensive performance tanked his rating despite elite defensive metrics (+6.4). His excellent hustle and rebounding simply couldn't compensate for being an absolute zero on the scoring end.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +23.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.1

Capitalizing on spot-up opportunities, his highly efficient shooting stretched the floor and punished defensive rotations. Pinpoint accuracy from beyond the arc was the catalyst for his strong positive rating, doubling his recent scoring average. This low-maintenance scoring punch provided a massive boost without requiring heavy usage.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 17.6m
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.4

Failing to make an impact on the glass or as a facilitator made his minutes highly unproductive. A lack of defensive resistance and low overall involvement resulted in a deeply negative score, snapping his streak of highly efficient shooting nights. The defensive lapses (-1.6) compounded his quiet offensive output, making him a clear liability.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg -9.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

While he offered some defensive value (+2.8), his inability to secure a single rebound or generate offense limited his utility. Complete invisibility on the glass and as a playmaker kept his net impact in the negative. The lack of tangible production across most categories made his stint largely ineffective.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.9

His complete lack of involvement in the offense meant his team was essentially playing four-on-five during his minutes. Registering zero counting stats across the board led to a negative impact rating. The empty stint provided no value to offset the natural bleed of a neutral defensive presence.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -43.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.4

He managed a couple of quick passes, but missing his only shot attempt kept his offensive value muted. A very brief appearance yielded a slightly negative score due to a lack of scoring output. The short stint didn't allow enough time to make a significant positive or negative mark.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Max Christie 32.8m
18
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.9

Busting out of a recent shooting slump, his high-volume success from deep provided a crucial offensive spark. Perimeter marksmanship was the primary engine behind his strong positive rating. Solid defensive metrics (+3.8) ensured that his scoring surge wasn't undermined by lapses on the other end.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +2.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cooper Flagg 31.9m
11
pts
11
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.5

Offensive inefficiency tanked his overall impact despite a massive defensive contribution (+7.5). A barrage of 14 missed shots dragged down his value, neutralizing the positive effects of his playmaking and rebounding. The stark drop-off from his recent scoring tear highlighted how much his empty possessions hurt the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/18 (22.2%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.5%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +12.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +4.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Ryan Nembhard 31.8m
9
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
-5.6

The playmaking was steady, but his overall offensive footprint wasn't dominant enough to overcome the hidden costs of empty possessions. Despite solid facilitation, an inability to generate high-value scoring opportunities kept his net impact in the red. A slight negative defensive rating further dragged down his overall effectiveness during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.7%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +3.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.8m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
20
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.2

Capitalizing on high-percentage looks allowed him to continue his hot streak of efficient scoring, punishing the defense inside and out. Exceptional shot selection and finishing drove a massive positive impact. His ability to stretch the floor with a trio of triples added a valuable dimension that amplified his overall offensive footprint.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.2%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -10.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +8.2
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Khris Middleton 17.6m
4
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.9

Failing to convert a single field goal attempt cratered his offensive value, making him a liability on that end of the floor. This complete inability to find the bottom of the net resulted in a severely negative impact score. His minor hustle contributions were nowhere near enough to offset the empty possessions he generated.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.6%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -28.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
23
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.4

Exploding for a massive scoring increase compared to his recent average, his perimeter marksmanship punished defensive rotations. A blistering shooting display single-handedly drove his positive impact. The sheer volume of efficient scoring easily masked a slight negative rating on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +20.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +6.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Moussa Cisse 21.7m
11
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.1

Converting almost all of his looks around the basket maximized his offensive value without needing high volume. Elite interior efficiency and rim protection fueled a highly productive stint. His defensive presence (+3.8) and rebounding anchored the paint, making him a major net positive.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +5.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +9.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
AJ Johnson 17.1m
4
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.7

Clanking the vast majority of his attempts created a slew of empty possessions that stalled the offense. Disastrous shot selection and execution completely derailed his overall rating. While he offered some resistance defensively (+2.3), the sheer volume of wasted offensive trips made him a significant net negative.

Shooting
FG 1/11 (9.1%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 16.8%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -31.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring -3.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.3

He provided decent hustle and connective passing, but lacked the offensive aggression to move the needle significantly. A low-usage profile resulted in a relatively neutral impact score, continuing a trend of quiet offensive nights. The lack of scoring punch kept his overall value hovering just below the break-even point.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -40.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyler Smith 15.3m
3
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.2

Failing to secure a single rebound severely limited his utility on the floor. Invisibility on the glass and low offensive involvement led to a negative net rating. Without enough volume or defensive disruption to compensate, his minutes were largely empty.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -27.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.3m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0