Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
WAS lead PHX lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHX 2P — 3P —
WAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 179 attempts

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Booker Hard 8/23 -4.0
Brooks Hard 8/20 0.0
Gillespie Hard 10/14 +12.2
Goodwin 6/14 -0.6
O'Neale Hard 5/8 +7.0
Richards Open 1/8 -7.5
Bouyea Hard 0/6 -5.7
Ighodaro Open 2/3 +0.6
Livers Hard 1/3 -0.3
Fleming Hard 0/2 -1.9

WAS WAS Shot-making Δ

McCollum Hard 6/13 -0.4
Johnson Hard 9/12 +13.5
Riley Hard 4/10 0.0
Champagnie 4/9 -1.0
Carrington Hard 4/8 +2.4
Coulibaly Hard 3/8 -0.1
Bagley III Open 2/5 -2.0
Sarr Hard 1/5 -2.7
Branham 2/4 0.0
Watkins Hard 1/4 -1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHX
WAS
41/101 Field Goals 36/78
40.6% Field Goal % 46.2%
17/40 3-Pointers 13/32
42.5% 3-Point % 40.6%
16/18 Free Throws 16/21
88.9% Free Throw % 76.2%
52.8% True Shooting % 57.9%
61 Total Rebounds 48
20 Offensive 9
31 Defensive 34
25 Assists 21
2.50 Assist/TO Ratio 1.31
10 Turnovers 15
8 Steals 6
3 Blocks 8
14 Fouls 20
32 Points in Paint 36
12 Fast Break Pts 18
21 Points off TOs 13
26 Second Chance Pts 10
21 Bench Points 42
17 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Collin Gillespie
25 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 28.6 MIN
+27.46
2
Tre Johnson
24 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 25.1 MIN
+18.65
3
Jordan Goodwin
14 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 27.8 MIN
+16.22
4
Oso Ighodaro
6 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 29.8 MIN
+14.72
5
Royce O'Neale
15 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 32.6 MIN
+14.16
6
Dillon Brooks
26 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 32.6 MIN
+13.59
7
CJ McCollum
17 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 28.2 MIN
+12.76
8
Marvin Bagley III
7 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 22.1 MIN
+12.25
9
Devin Booker
22 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 35.4 MIN
+9.2
10
Justin Champagnie
11 PTS · 6 REB · 0 AST · 26.7 MIN
+8.59
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:18 W. Riley 26' 3PT pullup (10 PTS) 115–101
Q4 0:36 W. Riley REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 115–98
Q4 0:38 MISS R. Fleming 11' fadeaway Shot 115–98
Q4 0:47 R. Fleming REBOUND (Off:3 Def:1) 115–98
Q4 0:50 MISS J. Bouyea 16' step back Shot 115–98
Q4 1:04 B. Carrington traveling TURNOVER (1 TO) 115–98
Q4 1:18 C. Gillespie 8' step back Jump Shot (25 PTS) 115–98
Q4 1:38 B. Coulibaly Free Throw 2 of 2 (13 PTS) 113–98
Q4 1:38 TEAM offensive REBOUND 113–97
Q4 1:38 MISS B. Coulibaly Free Throw 1 of 2 113–97
Q4 1:38 D. Brooks shooting personal FOUL (2 PF) (Coulibaly 2 FT) 113–97
Q4 1:45 D. Brooks Free Throw 2 of 2 (26 PTS) 113–97
Q4 1:45 D. Brooks Free Throw 1 of 2 (25 PTS) 112–97
Q4 1:45 T. Johnson shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Brooks 2 FT) 111–97
Q4 1:53 C. McCollum 9' driving floating Jump Shot (17 PTS) 111–97

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

WAS Washington Wizards
S CJ McCollum 28.2m
17
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.6

A surprising defensive masterclass (+8.0 Def) salvaged his value on a night where his three-point shot completely abandoned him. He made up for the perimeter goose egg by disrupting passing lanes and generating key transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 30.5%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S Bilal Coulibaly 26.6m
13
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.7

Despite respectable counting stats, his minutes were plagued by negative lineup variance, resulting in a steep -8.4 impact. He struggled to contain dribble penetration, allowing the opposition to generate high-percentage looks in the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +8.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Tre Johnson 25.1m
24
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.7

Flawless perimeter execution torched the defensive coverage and drove a robust +8.1 impact. His scorching hot shooting completely warped the defense, creating massive driving lanes for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.5%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -40.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Scoring +22.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Alex Sarr 24.8m
2
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-9.1

Exceptional rim protection (+8.1 Def) was heavily counteracted by a complete inability to finish inside. His offensive passivity and missed bunnies dragged his overall rating into the negative (-3.9) despite anchoring the paint well.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -61.0
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jamir Watkins 17.3m
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.6

Poor shot selection from beyond the arc stalled out offensive possessions, driving a poor -7.2 net impact. Although he tried to compensate with active hustle plays, the lack of scoring gravity severely hampered the floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -2.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.0

Efficient shooting wasn't enough to overcome the defensive breakdowns that occurred during his shifts, leading to a -4.3 impact. He struggled to navigate screens at the point of attack, giving up straight-line drives that compromised the backline.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.3

Solid defensive positioning (+4.6 Def) kept him hovering right around a neutral impact (-0.2). However, a lack of ball movement and some forced perimeter looks prevented him from moving the needle into positive territory.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.1%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +4.7
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.2

Transformed his typical game by dominating the defensive interior (+9.6 Def) to post a highly positive +9.0 overall score. Even with his scoring volume cut in half, his timely rotations and rim deterrence proved invaluable.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +7.9
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 9.1%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
Will Riley 20.6m
10
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.2

A sharp decline in offensive efficiency and volume resulted in a slightly negative -1.1 impact. He couldn't find his usual rhythm in the mid-range, leading to empty possessions that stalled the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.8

Passive offensive involvement severely limited his utility, dragging his score down to -4.8. He floated on the perimeter without pressuring the defense, making him a net-negative despite decent defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
AJ Johnson 1.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Inserted only for the final minute of the game, leaving no footprint on the actual outcome. His -0.4 impact score is statistically insignificant given the lack of real playing time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

Barely saw the floor in this contest, logging just over a minute of action. The slight negative score (-0.3) is purely a byproduct of garbage time variance rather than any meaningful mistakes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +3.2
Defense -2.0
Turnovers -1.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 35.4m
22
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.5

A brutal shooting night dragged his overall impact deeply into the red (-6.1). Settling for contested jumpers rather than attacking the rim derailed the offensive rhythm, turning a usually reliable primary option into a possession-drainer.

Shooting
FG 8/23 (34.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 42.2%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 32.6m
26
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+11.6

Aggressive shot-hunting yielded a massive scoring spike, but poor finishing and a lack of ball movement kept his overall impact entirely neutral (+0.3). Forcing contested looks rather than keeping the offense flowing negated the value of his high usage rate.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 31.2%
Net Rtg +39.4
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Royce O'Neale 32.6m
15
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.7

Blistering perimeter shooting provided excellent spacing, yet his overall net impact dipped slightly into the negative (-0.7). The discrepancy suggests his minutes coincided with opponent runs, masking an otherwise highly efficient offensive showing where he punished late closeouts.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 93.8%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +28.8
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Oso Ighodaro 29.8m
6
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.2

Elite defensive positioning (+10.9 Def) and relentless board work drove a stellar +10.7 overall impact despite a sharp drop in scoring. He anchored the interior perfectly, proving he doesn't need touches to completely control the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +46.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +12.7
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 35.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
25
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+24.8

An absolute revelation offensively, punishing drop coverage to generate a massive +13.8 net impact. His decisive shot selection and crisp playmaking completely flipped the game script, providing a staggering scoring surge from the backcourt.

Shooting
FG 10/14 (71.4%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +24.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +22.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +7.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.5

Tremendous two-way energy (+5.7 Hustle, +5.9 Def) fueled a highly positive +8.4 impact score. He consistently generated extra possessions through sheer effort, compensating for a somewhat streaky shooting performance with relentless point-of-attack pressure.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +8.9
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.3

Finishing at the rim was a nightmare, but strong interior defense (+4.0 Def) kept his impact above water (+1.9). He functioned purely as a space-eater and glass-cleaner, salvaging his minutes despite the offensive futility.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 12.5%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring -4.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +10.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-16.3

Blanking from the field cratered his net impact (-9.7) during a rough stint. The inability to break down the defense or hit open looks allowed opponents to sag off, stalling the second-unit offense completely.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 14.5%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -38.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Scoring -2.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

A completely invisible offensive shift resulted in a negative overall rating (-3.0). Failing to register a single hustle stat meant he was merely existing on the floor rather than actively shaping the game.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.1

Brief rotational minutes yielded a slightly negative impact (-1.2) due to defensive lapses. While he managed to knock down a perimeter look, he struggled to stay in front of his assignments on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -42.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.7m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Seeing the floor for barely a minute at the end of the game resulted in a negligible -0.6 impact. There was zero opportunity to establish any rhythm or defensive presence in such a short stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -300.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -1.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

A garbage-time cameo didn't provide enough runway to influence the game. His slight negative score (-0.6) simply reflects the team giving up a bucket during his brief seconds on the hardwood.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -300.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -0.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0