GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

WAS Washington Wizards
S CJ McCollum 28.2m
17
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.1

A surprising defensive masterclass (+8.0 Def) salvaged his value on a night where his three-point shot completely abandoned him. He made up for the perimeter goose egg by disrupting passing lanes and generating key transition opportunities.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 30.5%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +6.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense +8.0
Raw total +18.3
Avg player in 28.2m -15.2
Impact +3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 3
S Bilal Coulibaly 26.6m
13
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.4

Despite respectable counting stats, his minutes were plagued by negative lineup variance, resulting in a steep -8.4 impact. He struggled to contain dribble penetration, allowing the opposition to generate high-percentage looks in the paint.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +1.4
Defense +1.1
Raw total +6.0
Avg player in 26.6m -14.4
Impact -8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Tre Johnson 25.1m
24
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.1

Flawless perimeter execution torched the defensive coverage and drove a robust +8.1 impact. His scorching hot shooting completely warped the defense, creating massive driving lanes for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.5%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -40.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +17.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.6
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 25.1m -13.5
Impact +8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Alex Sarr 24.8m
2
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.9

Exceptional rim protection (+8.1 Def) was heavily counteracted by a complete inability to finish inside. His offensive passivity and missed bunnies dragged his overall rating into the negative (-3.9) despite anchoring the paint well.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -61.0
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Offense -1.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense +8.1
Raw total +9.5
Avg player in 24.8m -13.4
Impact -3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jamir Watkins 17.3m
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Poor shot selection from beyond the arc stalled out offensive possessions, driving a poor -7.2 net impact. Although he tried to compensate with active hustle plays, the lack of scoring gravity severely hampered the floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -2.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Offense -1.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.9
Raw total +2.1
Avg player in 17.3m -9.3
Impact -7.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-4.3

Efficient shooting wasn't enough to overcome the defensive breakdowns that occurred during his shifts, leading to a -4.3 impact. He struggled to navigate screens at the point of attack, giving up straight-line drives that compromised the backline.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Offense +7.2
Hustle +1.0
Defense +1.9
Raw total +10.1
Avg player in 26.8m -14.4
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.2

Solid defensive positioning (+4.6 Def) kept him hovering right around a neutral impact (-0.2). However, a lack of ball movement and some forced perimeter looks prevented him from moving the needle into positive territory.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.1%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.7m
Offense +7.3
Hustle +2.2
Defense +4.6
Raw total +14.1
Avg player in 26.7m -14.3
Impact -0.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.0

Transformed his typical game by dominating the defensive interior (+9.6 Def) to post a highly positive +9.0 overall score. Even with his scoring volume cut in half, his timely rotations and rim deterrence proved invaluable.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +22.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Offense +9.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +9.6
Raw total +20.8
Avg player in 22.1m -11.8
Impact +9.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 9.1%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
Will Riley 20.6m
10
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.1

A sharp decline in offensive efficiency and volume resulted in a slightly negative -1.1 impact. He couldn't find his usual rhythm in the mid-range, leading to empty possessions that stalled the team's momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Offense +6.2
Hustle +2.0
Defense +1.7
Raw total +9.9
Avg player in 20.6m -11.0
Impact -1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

Passive offensive involvement severely limited his utility, dragging his score down to -4.8. He floated on the perimeter without pressuring the defense, making him a net-negative despite decent defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.9%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Offense +2.2
Hustle +1.8
Defense +1.7
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 19.6m -10.5
Impact -4.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Barely saw the floor in this contest, logging just over a minute of action. The slight negative score (-0.3) is purely a byproduct of garbage time variance rather than any meaningful mistakes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense +0.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.3
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
AJ Johnson 1.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Inserted only for the final minute of the game, leaving no footprint on the actual outcome. His -0.4 impact score is statistically insignificant given the lack of real playing time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +0.2
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 35.4m
22
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.1

A brutal shooting night dragged his overall impact deeply into the red (-6.1). Settling for contested jumpers rather than attacking the rim derailed the offensive rhythm, turning a usually reliable primary option into a possession-drainer.

Shooting
FG 8/23 (34.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 42.2%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Offense +8.2
Hustle +2.2
Defense +2.5
Raw total +12.9
Avg player in 35.4m -19.0
Impact -6.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 32.6m
26
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.3

Aggressive shot-hunting yielded a massive scoring spike, but poor finishing and a lack of ball movement kept his overall impact entirely neutral (+0.3). Forcing contested looks rather than keeping the offense flowing negated the value of his high usage rate.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 31.2%
Net Rtg +39.4
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.3
Raw total +17.9
Avg player in 32.6m -17.6
Impact +0.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Royce O'Neale 32.6m
15
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.7

Blistering perimeter shooting provided excellent spacing, yet his overall net impact dipped slightly into the negative (-0.7). The discrepancy suggests his minutes coincided with opponent runs, masking an otherwise highly efficient offensive showing where he punished late closeouts.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 93.8%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +28.8
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Offense +12.9
Hustle +1.4
Defense +2.4
Raw total +16.7
Avg player in 32.6m -17.4
Impact -0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Oso Ighodaro 29.8m
6
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.7

Elite defensive positioning (+10.9 Def) and relentless board work drove a stellar +10.7 overall impact despite a sharp drop in scoring. He anchored the interior perfectly, proving he doesn't need touches to completely control the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +46.5
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Offense +11.6
Hustle +4.2
Defense +10.9
Raw total +26.7
Avg player in 29.8m -16.0
Impact +10.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 35.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
25
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.8

An absolute revelation offensively, punishing drop coverage to generate a massive +13.8 net impact. His decisive shot selection and crisp playmaking completely flipped the game script, providing a staggering scoring surge from the backcourt.

Shooting
FG 10/14 (71.4%)
3PT 5/8 (62.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +24.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Offense +22.2
Hustle +1.4
Defense +5.5
Raw total +29.1
Avg player in 28.6m -15.3
Impact +13.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.4

Tremendous two-way energy (+5.7 Hustle, +5.9 Def) fueled a highly positive +8.4 impact score. He consistently generated extra possessions through sheer effort, compensating for a somewhat streaky shooting performance with relentless point-of-attack pressure.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +11.7
Hustle +5.7
Defense +5.9
Raw total +23.3
Avg player in 27.8m -14.9
Impact +8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.9

Finishing at the rim was a nightmare, but strong interior defense (+4.0 Def) kept his impact above water (+1.9). He functioned purely as a space-eater and glass-cleaner, salvaging his minutes despite the offensive futility.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 12.5%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -28.6
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Offense +4.4
Hustle +2.6
Defense +4.0
Raw total +11.0
Avg player in 17.1m -9.1
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.7

Blanking from the field cratered his net impact (-9.7) during a rough stint. The inability to break down the defense or hit open looks allowed opponents to sag off, stalling the second-unit offense completely.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 14.5%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -38.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.6m
Offense -5.4
Hustle +0.8
Defense +1.6
Raw total -3.0
Avg player in 12.6m -6.7
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.0

A completely invisible offensive shift resulted in a negative overall rating (-3.0). Failing to register a single hustle stat meant he was merely existing on the floor rather than actively shaping the game.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -29.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Offense +2.1
Hustle 0.0
Defense +1.2
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 11.7m -6.3
Impact -3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.2

Brief rotational minutes yielded a slightly negative impact (-1.2) due to defensive lapses. While he managed to knock down a perimeter look, he struggled to stay in front of his assignments on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -42.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.7m
Offense +3.9
Hustle +0.4
Defense -0.3
Raw total +4.0
Avg player in 9.7m -5.2
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

A garbage-time cameo didn't provide enough runway to influence the game. His slight negative score (-0.6) simply reflects the team giving up a bucket during his brief seconds on the hardwood.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -300.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Seeing the floor for barely a minute at the end of the game resulted in a negligible -0.6 impact. There was zero opportunity to establish any rhythm or defensive presence in such a short stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -300.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0