Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
BKN lead PHX lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHX 2P — 3P —
BKN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 158 attempts

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Booker 10/18 +2.3
Brooks Hard 8/15 +7.8
Allen Hard 5/13 +1.6
Gillespie Hard 7/10 +10.0
O'Neale Hard 4/8 +2.3
Williams Open 5/6 +2.2
Ighodaro Open 2/2 +1.2
Dunn Hard 1/2 +0.7
Goodwin 1/2 0.0
Livers Open 1/1 +0.6

BKN BKN Shot-making Δ

Porter Jr. 10/23 -2.9
Clowney 5/10 +0.8
Claxton 6/8 +3.5
Traore 3/8 -2.1
Powell Hard 4/7 +3.7
Williams Hard 4/7 +3.0
Mann 4/6 +3.0
Wolf Hard 2/5 +1.5
Martin 3/4 +2.6
Wilson 0/3 -3.5
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHX
BKN
44/77 Field Goals 41/81
57.1% Field Goal % 50.6%
20/39 3-Pointers 15/38
51.3% 3-Point % 39.5%
18/23 Free Throws 20/21
78.3% Free Throw % 95.2%
72.3% True Shooting % 64.8%
47 Total Rebounds 34
7 Offensive 7
28 Defensive 21
29 Assists 28
2.23 Assist/TO Ratio 3.50
12 Turnovers 7
4 Steals 7
4 Blocks 1
17 Fouls 21
38 Points in Paint 40
20 Fast Break Pts 15
13 Points off TOs 21
19 Second Chance Pts 10
26 Bench Points 45
20 Largest Lead 3
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Collin Gillespie
22 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 28.2 MIN
+25.65
2
Dillon Brooks
27 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 34.0 MIN
+21.49
3
Mark Williams
16 PTS · 8 REB · 0 AST · 29.0 MIN
+20.41
4
Nic Claxton
12 PTS · 8 REB · 6 AST · 37.5 MIN
+15.21
5
Ziaire Williams
15 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 23.5 MIN
+14.33
6
Michael Porter Jr.
23 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 36.6 MIN
+14.32
7
Devin Booker
24 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 33.1 MIN
+12.31
8
Noah Clowney
16 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 27.9 MIN
+12.25
9
Tyrese Martin
9 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 15.2 MIN
+12.19
10
Grayson Allen
14 PTS · 3 REB · 8 AST · 30.3 MIN
+10.55
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:10 M. Williams STEAL (2 STL) 126–117
Q4 0:10 T. Mann bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 126–117
Q4 0:18 PHX shot clock Team TURNOVER 126–117
Q4 0:18 TEAM offensive REBOUND 126–117
Q4 0:18 MISS D. Brooks 14' turnaround Shot 126–117
Q4 0:18 TEAM offensive REBOUND 126–117
Q4 0:18 N. Claxton BLOCK (1 BLK) 126–117
Q4 0:18 MISS G. Allen driving Layup - blocked 126–117
Q4 0:42 T. Mann driving reverse Layup (10 PTS) (D. Powell 3 AST) 126–117
Q4 0:51 D. Booker 8' driving floating Jump Shot (24 PTS) 126–115
Q4 1:13 D. Brooks REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 124–115
Q4 1:17 MISS D. Powell 25' pullup 3PT 124–115
Q4 1:34 TEAM defensive REBOUND 124–115
Q4 1:35 MISS G. Allen 3PT 124–115
Q4 1:54 M. Williams REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 124–115

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BKN Brooklyn Nets
S Nic Claxton 37.5m
12
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+8.9

Elite rim-running and vertical spacing put constant pressure on the interior defense. His ability to switch onto guards and recover to the paint stifled multiple offensive actions. Highly efficient finishing and relentless rim protection drove a solid positive impact.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +8.2
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+11.6

High-volume, low-efficiency shooting from beyond the arc acted as an anchor on his overall value. He forced contested jumpers early in the shot clock, bailing out the defense and wasting offensive possessions. Strong defensive rotations and rebounding effort managed to pull his net impact back to near-neutral despite the brick-heavy performance.

Shooting
FG 10/23 (43.5%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.1%
USG% 35.6%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Noah Clowney 27.9m
16
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.8

A sudden scoring burst masked underlying issues with ball security and defensive positioning. While he capitalized on finishing opportunities around the rim, costly turnovers in transition likely dragged his total score down. The offensive uptick was ultimately neutralized by mistakes that fueled opponent runs.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -26.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +12.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Terance Mann 26.3m
10
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
-2.8

Playmaking and efficient scoring were completely undermined by a porous defensive showing. He consistently lost his man off the ball and struggled to navigate screens, giving up easy driving lanes. The defensive bleeding heavily outweighed his offensive facilitation.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -22.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +4.1
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 90.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Drake Powell 24.8m
11
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.4

Phenomenal hustle metrics highlight a relentless motor, but loose ball security likely eroded his overall value. He generated extra possessions through sheer effort on the glass, yet gave them right back with sloppy decision-making in traffic. A balanced shooting night wasn't quite enough to overcome the negative plays that stalled momentum.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg -40.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.0

Capitalized on spot-up opportunities and attacked closeouts with decisive aggression. Exceptional hustle plays, including key deflections and contested rebounds, amplified his efficient scoring. He provided a massive spark off the wing by seamlessly blending offensive execution with high-energy defense.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.6%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +16.6
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Nolan Traore 22.1m
10
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Poor shot selection and an inability to finish through contact severely hampered his offensive rhythm. He drove into traffic without a plan, leading to empty trips and likely live-ball turnovers. The lack of defensive playmaking meant he couldn't recoup the value lost on the offensive end.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg +9.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.7

Provided instant offense with decisive cuts and confident perimeter shooting. His defensive intensity disrupted passing lanes, creating transition opportunities that he quickly converted. A highly efficient and energetic burst that significantly tilted the floor during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -3.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Danny Wolf 13.4m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.4

Stretched the floor effectively as a trailer, pulling the opposing big away from the rim. His defensive positioning was sound, altering shots without fouling during his brief stint. A steady, mistake-free performance resulted in a marginally positive shift.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -26.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.4m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jalen Wilson 12.7m
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.8

An absolute zero on the offensive end, failing to connect on any field goal attempts and stalling the offense. His inability to punish closeouts allowed the defense to sag and clog the paint. Despite adequate defensive effort, his offensive struggles created a massive drag on the lineup.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.5%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.7m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Dillon Brooks 34.0m
27
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+17.2

Scorching perimeter shot-making shattered his recent slump and warped the opposing defense's geometry. The sheer gravity of his deep shooting opened up driving lanes for teammates, easily offsetting minor defensive lapses. A massive offensive surge defined his night, driving a highly positive overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 6/9 (66.7%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.5%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Scoring +21.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Devin Booker 33.1m
24
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.4

A heavy reliance on mid-range isolation kept the offense afloat but capped his overall efficiency ceiling. He essentially traded baskets with his primary matchup, failing to generate a distinct mathematical advantage despite the scoring volume. The lack of three-point generation and potential defensive concessions resulted in a surprisingly neutral net impact.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 31.9%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Mark Williams 29.0m
16
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.3

Interior dominance defined his shift, anchoring the paint with exceptional rim protection and flawless finishing. Massive hustle metrics highlight a relentless effort on the glass, generating crucial extra possessions. He completely shut down opponent drives, cementing an elite two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.0%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +7.2
Defense +5.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 2
S Royce O'Neale 28.6m
11
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-7.8

Despite efficient perimeter shooting, his overall footprint cratered due to severe hidden costs like live-ball turnovers or transition defensive breakdowns. He consistently lost his assignment on the perimeter, bleeding points and forcing the defense into rotation. The resulting massive negative impact reflects a player who gave back far more than he created offensively.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg +19.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
22
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+21.3

An unexpected offensive explosion from the perimeter completely tilted the game's momentum. Elite shot selection and punishing of defensive rotations yielded a massive spike in scoring efficiency. Solid point-of-attack defense further cemented a stellar, highly impactful performance.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 93.5%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +28.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +19.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +5.4
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
0.0

Cold streaks from the floor and poor shot selection dragged down his overall effectiveness. He settled for heavily contested looks on the perimeter, resulting in empty possessions that stalled the offense. Defensive vulnerabilities were exposed, compounding the damage of his inefficient volume.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.3m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +2.8
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 19.0m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.3

A stark drop in offensive involvement rendered him largely invisible on that end of the floor. Without his usual scoring punch, his minor contributions in hustle and defense weren't enough to keep his impact out of the red. He struggled to find his rhythm within the offensive flow, leading to a highly negative stint.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -0.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.0m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Ryan Dunn 17.5m
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.2

Floating on the perimeter without demanding the ball led to a steep decline in his usual offensive production. He failed to leverage his athleticism in transition or on cuts, resulting in a stagnant half-court presence. The negative impact reflects a player who was largely a spectator during his shift.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg -26.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.5m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.9

Minimal offensive aggression and a failure to generate rim pressure resulted in a highly passive outing. While he provided adequate effort on the margins, the lack of tangible playmaking severely limited his utility. His minutes were characterized by an inability to exploit defensive gaps.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg +15.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.3

Made the most of a brief cameo by executing his limited role without making mistakes. A quick bucket and solid positional defense provided a stabilizing presence during his short stint. He effectively held the fort without bleeding any value.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.6m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0