Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead GSW lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
GSW 2P — 3P —
PHX 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 155 attempts

GSW GSW Shot-making Δ

Podziemski 9/17 +3.8
Curry Hard 4/16 -3.7
Melton Hard 5/10 +2.3
Horford Hard 3/8 -0.6
Santos 4/8 -1.0
Porziņģis 3/5 +2.2
Green 2/4 -0.6
Payton II 2/4 -0.6
Spencer Hard 1/2 +0.3

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Green Hard 14/20 +15.1
Brooks Hard 4/14 -2.8
Booker Hard 5/12 -1.2
Goodwin 7/11 +5.6
O'Neale Hard 4/11 -0.2
Ighodaro Open 4/6 +1.2
Highsmith Hard 0/3 -3.3
Gillespie Hard 1/2 +0.3
Maluach Hard 0/1 -0.9
Dunn Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
GSW
PHX
33/74 Field Goals 39/81
44.6% Field Goal % 48.1%
11/33 3-Pointers 18/49
33.3% 3-Point % 36.7%
19/23 Free Throws 15/15
82.6% Free Throw % 100.0%
57.1% True Shooting % 63.4%
49 Total Rebounds 39
12 Offensive 9
27 Defensive 27
22 Assists 23
1.05 Assist/TO Ratio 1.53
20 Turnovers 12
5 Steals 14
0 Blocks 4
19 Fouls 23
42 Points in Paint 28
10 Fast Break Pts 14
10 Points off TOs 30
13 Second Chance Pts 13
31 Bench Points 13
2 Largest Lead 18
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jalen Green
36 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 39.5 MIN
+36.67
2
Jordan Goodwin
19 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 34.4 MIN
+34.25
3
Devin Booker
20 PTS · 6 REB · 8 AST · 42.2 MIN
+17.3
4
De'Anthony Melton
16 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 27.8 MIN
+16.74
5
Brandin Podziemski
23 PTS · 10 REB · 0 AST · 38.8 MIN
+14.44
6
Oso Ighodaro
10 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 26.4 MIN
+12.41
7
Gui Santos
9 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 30.0 MIN
+7.65
8
Stephen Curry
17 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 36.0 MIN
+6.21
9
Al Horford
9 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 26.4 MIN
+5.57
10
Collin Gillespie
2 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 17.2 MIN
+3.29
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 P. Spencer 14' pullup Jump Shot (2 PTS) 96–111
Q4 0:08 PHX shot clock Team TURNOVER 94–111
Q4 0:30 J. Bouyea REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 94–111
Q4 0:34 MISS P. Spencer 28' step back 3PT 94–111
Q4 0:49 D. Melton REBOUND (Off:3 Def:5) 94–111
Q4 0:53 MISS K. Maluach 26' 3PT 94–111
Q4 1:04 Ejection D. Booker 94–111
Q4 1:04 Ejection D. Green 94–111
Q4 1:04 D. Booker double technical FOUL (2 Tech) 94–111
Q4 1:04 D. Green double technical FOUL (2 Tech) 94–111
Q4 1:06 D. Booker double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 94–111
Q4 1:06 D. Green double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 94–111
Q4 1:06 D. Booker away-from-play Free Throw 1 of 1 (20 PTS) 94–111
Q4 1:06 D. Green away-from-play personal FOUL (6 PF) (Booker 1 FT) 94–110
Q4 1:09 R. O'Neale REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 94–110

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 42.2m
20
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
+10.0

Booker's positive impact was heavily reliant on his sheer scoring volume (+15.3) and ability to hit tough, contested jumpers (+2.6 shot-making). However, his defensive apathy (-0.1) and modest creation numbers (+2.3) prevented this from being a truly elite masterclass. He managed to keep the offense afloat through sheer isolation brilliance, overcoming a lack of secondary contributions.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 10/10 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.0%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +32.5
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.2m
Scoring +15.3
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Green 39.5m
36
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+36.6

Green engineered a transcendent offensive explosion, driven by an astronomical +31.5 scoring metric and a jaw-dropping +10.6 shot-making bonus. He was converting incredibly difficult looks from all over the floor, completely breaking the opponent's defensive scheme. Surprisingly strong defensive engagement (+3.8) ensured that his minor turnover issues (-4.7) were merely a footnote in a dominant, single-handed carry job.

Shooting
FG 14/20 (70.0%)
3PT 8/14 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg +32.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +31.5
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +10.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +3.8
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 2
S Jordan Goodwin 34.4m
19
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+34.4

Goodwin unleashed an absolute masterclass in two-way disruption, highlighted by a staggering +12.7 defensive rating that completely suffocated opposing ball-handlers. He paired this point-of-attack dominance with a massive +11.4 hustle score, relentlessly attacking the glass to generate extra possessions. A +4.6 shot-making bonus proves he wasn't just getting easy looks, capping off a game-wrecking performance defined by pure, unadulterated energy.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.0%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +28.7
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +11.4
Defense +12.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 6
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dillon Brooks 29.8m
13
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-11.7

A catastrophic -12.6 turnover penalty completely nuked Brooks's overall impact, erasing a solid night of difficult shot-making (+3.5). His erratic decision-making and forced passes routinely hijacked the offense and fueled opponent transition runs. Despite converting tough looks (+5.9 scoring), his inability to protect the basketball and a negative defensive rating (-0.9) rendered his minutes highly detrimental.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.7%
USG% 30.3%
Net Rtg +38.4
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -12.6
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Oso Ighodaro 26.4m
10
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.2

Ighodaro anchored his positive impact with highly efficient interior finishing (+8.7 scoring) and solid work on the glass (+3.7 hustle). He provided steady, low-usage value by converting his looks (+1.3 shot-making) and avoiding major defensive lapses (+1.0). This performance highlighted his effectiveness as a reliable rim-runner who doesn't need the ball to positively influence the game.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg +0.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +3.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
11
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.5

A brutal -4.0 defensive rating completely undermined O'Neale's value, as he was routinely targeted and exploited on the perimeter. While he managed to hit some difficult shots (+3.2 shot-making), his complete lack of playmaking (+0.0 creation) and minimal hustle (+0.6) made him a one-dimensional liability. His defensive lapses far outweighed his spot-up shooting, resulting in a deeply negative overall shift.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -0.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.4

Gillespie's inability to generate any meaningful offensive gravity (+1.2 scoring) severely handicapped his overall impact during this stint. While he provided marginal defensive (+0.8) and hustle (+1.6) value, his lack of creation (+0.3) left the second unit entirely stagnant. This performance was defined by crippling offensive passivity that actively hurt the team's halfcourt execution.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.1%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.6

Highsmith provided excellent defensive value (+2.9) but completely sabotaged his shift with a disastrous -2.3 scoring penalty stemming from poor shot selection. His failure to convert open looks or create for others (+0.0 creation) allowed the defense to completely sag off him. Ultimately, his offensive ineptitude heavily outweighed his gritty perimeter containment.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +52.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Scoring -2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Ryan Dunn 6.6m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Despite flashing his signature point-of-attack disruption with a +2.4 defensive rating, Dunn's absolute offensive paralysis (-0.8 scoring, zero creation) tanked his overall impact. Opposing defenses completely ignored him, turning every halfcourt possession into a 4-on-5 slog. His defensive brilliance simply couldn't compensate for being a total non-factor on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.0

Maluach was completely invisible during his brief stint, registering a negative scoring impact (-0.8) and failing to provide any rim deterrence (-0.3 defense). His inability to generate any creation or shot-making value rendered him an offensive black hole. This empty garbage-time appearance perfectly highlighted his ongoing struggles to make a tangible impact in limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg +18.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.7m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

In a microscopic one-minute appearance, Bouyea managed to drag down his impact score simply by failing to register any meaningful statistics. Aside from a negligible +0.3 hustle bump, he offered zero creation, defense, or scoring gravity. This stint was the definition of empty cardio, contributing nothing to the team's overall effort.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Coffey logged a completely blank shift, failing to record a single impact metric across the board. His total lack of hustle, defense, or offensive involvement highlights a stint defined by pure invisibility. He simply existed on the floor without influencing a single possession.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Fleming's brief cameo yielded absolutely zero statistical production, resulting in a flatlined impact score. He failed to generate any defensive stops, hustle plays, or offensive touches during his minute of action. It was a completely empty rotation stint that offered no value to either side of the ball.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
GSW Golden State Warriors
23
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+18.0

Podziemski dominated the margins with a staggering +11.7 hustle rating, relentlessly attacking the glass to create extra possessions. His elite scoring output (+16.7) was bolstered by a +5.1 shot-making bonus, indicating he was converting highly difficult looks at a premium rate. Even a noticeable turnover penalty (-7.0) couldn't put a dent in a performance defined by sheer two-way motor and tough shot execution.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 23.9%
Net Rtg -7.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +16.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +11.7
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Stephen Curry 36.0m
17
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.4

Curry salvaged a positive impact score through surprising defensive engagement (+3.2) and a solid +3.6 shot-making bonus on a night where his overall volume was muted. Careless ball security (-7.0 turnover penalty) severely capped his offensive ceiling and prevented him from taking over the game. Ultimately, his ability to hit high-degree-of-difficulty shots kept the offense afloat during disjointed stretches.

Shooting
FG 4/16 (25.0%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.6%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -23.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -7.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Draymond Green 35.6m
5
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
-16.4

A catastrophic -11.8 turnover penalty completely nuked Green's overall impact in this contest. While he managed to avoid being a total negative defensively (+0.3), his erratic passing and sloppy ball-handling consistently fueled opponent transition opportunities. This performance perfectly encapsulated his ongoing offensive identity crisis, as paralyzing hesitation actively sabotaged the team's halfcourt flow.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -21.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.3
Turnovers -11.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Gui Santos 30.0m
9
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.2

Santos generated massive value on the glass with a +6.7 hustle rating, keeping possessions alive despite a cold perimeter shooting night. However, severe ball-security issues (-4.7 turnover penalty) completely derailed his offensive rhythm and dragged his overall impact into the red. His inability to stretch the floor from deep compounded his decision-making struggles, allowing defenders to sag off and blow up passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -15.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Despite a highly efficient scoring punch (+8.6) and positive shot-making marks (+2.3), Porziņģis was undone by a disastrous -7.1 turnover cost in limited action. His defensive rotations were uncharacteristically sluggish (-1.6), failing to provide the rim deterrence expected of his size. The costly live-ball giveaways completely erased his offensive efficiency, rendering his brief stint a net negative.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.4%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -78.3
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.8m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
16
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.7

Relentless energy on the glass drove Melton's massive +10.2 hustle rating, providing a crucial secondary edge to his offensive burst. He capitalized on difficult looks with a +3.4 shot-making bonus, punishing defensive closeouts with high-efficiency scoring (+12.9). This performance highlighted his ability to wreck games purely through secondary effort and timely perimeter execution.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -17.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +12.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Al Horford 26.4m
9
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.3

Horford provided decent floor-spacing value (+5.5 scoring) and converted above expectations (+2.2 shot-making), but his lack of defensive deterrence (-0.3) left the interior vulnerable. A minor turnover penalty and quiet playmaking numbers (+0.7 creation) prevented him from tilting the game in a positive direction. His inability to anchor the defense against quicker matchups ultimately neutralized his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -7.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.7

Payton's typically elite defensive presence completely vanished, as a brutal -3.7 defensive rating exposed his struggles to contain dribble penetration. While he chipped in with solid hustle value (+3.8) on the boards, his offensive invisibility (+0.5 creation) left the team playing 4-on-5 in the halfcourt. This outing was a stark departure from his recent hyper-efficient stretch, defined entirely by uncharacteristic point-of-attack breakdowns.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -21.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.7

Spencer provided a microscopic offensive bump (+1.2 scoring) during his brief appearance, but his overall impact plummeted to -7.7 due to a complete lack of secondary contributions. Generating zero creation, hustle, or defensive value, his presence on the floor was largely unimpactful. This empty shift perfectly mirrored his midseason struggles with damaging passivity and an inability to tilt the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 66.7%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Bassey logged a ghost shift in his single minute of action, failing to record a single measurable event across any impact category. His complete lack of hustle or defensive metrics reflects a stint entirely devoid of engagement or opportunity. This brief cameo offered zero value, acting as pure cardio at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Richard's blink-and-you-miss-it appearance yielded absolutely zero statistical production, flatlining his impact across the board. He failed to register a single hustle play, defensive stop, or offensive touch during his brief time on the floor. It was a completely empty shift that perfectly encapsulated his recent struggles with extreme offensive passivity.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +66.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Seth Curry 1.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Curry was entirely invisible during his one minute of floor time, failing to generate any scoring gravity or secondary stats. With zeroes across the creation, hustle, and defensive categories, his presence was purely ceremonial. This empty stint did nothing to reverse his recent trend of rotational irrelevance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0