PHI

2025-26 Season

KELLY OUBRE JR.

Philadelphia 76ers | Forward-Guard | 6-8
Kelly Oubre Jr.
14.6 PPG
5.0 RPG
1.7 APG
32.0 MPG
-1.0 Impact

Jr. produces at an below average rate for a 32-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.0
Scoring +8.9
Points 14.6 PPG × +1.00 = +14.6
Missed 2PT 2.8/g × -0.78 = -2.2
Missed 3PT 3.1/g × -0.87 = -2.7
Missed FT 0.8/g × -1.00 = -0.8
Creation +2.3
Assists 1.7/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 1.2/g × +1.26 = +1.5
Turnovers -2.7
Turnovers 1.4/g × -1.95 = -2.7
Defense +2.5
Steals 1.2/g × +2.30 = +2.8
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 3.7/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.9
Contested Shots 3.7/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 4.1/g × +0.65 = +2.7
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +14.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.9
Net Impact
-1.0
36th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 75th
14.6 PPG
Efficiency 43th
55.9% TS
Playmaking 54th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 62th
5.0 RPG
Rim Protection 45th
0.13/min
Hustle 68th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 58th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening inconsistency defined Kelly Oubre Jr.'s first twenty games, marked by erratic decision-making and a mid-season demotion to the bench. High-scoring nights were frequently deceptive. During the 11/05 vs CLE matchup, a 19-point outing resulted in a dismal -5.6 impact score because defensive lapses and live-ball turnovers completely erased his offensive production. The sabotage was entirely self-inflicted. This chaotic approach bottomed out during a reserve shift on 01/09 vs ORL, where he went scoreless and posted a brutal -9.7 impact by operating as an offensive black hole who forced contested early-clock looks. Yet, just when you want to write him off, Oubre flips the script by leaning into his raw athleticism. Returning to the starting lineup on 01/11 vs TOR, he managed just 13 points but generated a stellar +5.2 impact score, using elite defensive disruption to anchor his value without needing a massive scoring night.

Kelly Oubre Jr.’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between game-wrecking hustle and catastrophic offensive decision-making. When fully engaged, he was a chaotic force of nature. This peak was perfectly captured on 01/22 vs HOU, where he generated a massive +9.2 impact score by fueling the team with sheer energy and elite hustle plays. Yet, that same chaotic energy frequently backfired. His shot selection regularly devolved into forcing contested jumpers early in the clock, resulting in a disastrous -19.2 impact on 02/11 vs NYK during a brutal 0-for-6 shooting night. Even when he actually found the bottom of the net, hidden costs often dragged down his overall effectiveness. On 02/24 vs IND, he shot an efficient 5-of-8 from the floor but still posted a dismal -5.6 impact because his erratic defensive gambles and poor transition spacing actively harmed the team. Oubre remains a tantalizing athlete, but his utter inability to rein in his worst habits makes him an incredibly volatile rotation piece.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Jr.'s impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 56% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jr. consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 44 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Brown 80.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 9
L. Ball 69.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
J. Brunson 64.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 5
D. Mitchell 57.6 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
D. White 55.3 poss
FG% 30.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
S. Hauser 51.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
B. Ingram 42.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
S. Bey 41.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 13
C. McCollum 39.6 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
I. Quickley 36.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Brown 102.3 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
B. Ingram 71.2 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
D. Mitchell 68.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 11
D. White 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
D. Brooks 41.4 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 13
S. Bey 39.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
K. Leonard 38.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.34
PTS 13
J. Brunson 35.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9
L. Ball 34.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7
D. DeRozan 34.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

45
Games
14.6
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.7
APG
1.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
46.7
FG%
36.9
3P%
75.9
FT%
32.0
MPG

GAME LOG

45 games played