GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 37.3m
24
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.5

Heavy offensive creation duties and solid defensive engagement kept his overall impact positive despite slightly inefficient volume shooting. Forcing the issue at times led to a minor dip from his usual scoring baseline, but his ability to command defensive attention constantly opened up the floor. Consistent hustle plays ensured his massive workload ultimately yielded a net benefit.

Shooting
FG 10/22 (45.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.5%
USG% 27.2%
Net Rtg +16.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Offense +12.6
Hustle +3.2
Defense +6.4
Raw total +22.2
Avg player in 37.3m -19.7
Impact +2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Grayson Allen 36.5m
18
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.9

Relentless perimeter pressure and elite defensive metrics drove a highly productive two-way performance. Punishing defensive rotations with confident outside shooting allowed him to elevate his efficiency well above his recent slump. His constant hustle and floor-stretching gravity were the defining elements of his heavy workload.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +29.3
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Offense +10.9
Hustle +3.1
Defense +8.1
Raw total +22.1
Avg player in 36.5m -19.2
Impact +2.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S Royce O'Neale 28.4m
17
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.3

Catch-and-shoot mastery from beyond the arc fueled a massive offensive surge that kept his impact firmly in the green. Consistently finding the soft spots in the defense allowed him to punish opponents for leaving him unattended on the perimeter. This long-range barrage, combined with steady hustle, perfectly complemented the primary creators.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 77.3%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +12.9
Hustle +2.2
Defense +1.1
Raw total +16.2
Avg player in 28.4m -14.9
Impact +1.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mark Williams 27.6m
13
pts
10
reb
0
ast
Impact
+12.0

Elite rim protection and off-the-charts hustle metrics anchored a dominant interior performance. Controlling the paint on both ends allowed him to generate extra possessions while completely stifling opponent drives. This physical, tone-setting presence in the middle was the primary driver of his massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +33.9
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Offense +14.8
Hustle +5.5
Defense +6.3
Raw total +26.6
Avg player in 27.6m -14.6
Impact +12.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 57.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jalen Green 23.0m
29
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.9

Operating as an absolute flamethrower from the perimeter, his high-volume shot-making broke the opposing defense wide open. Blending aggressive drives with lethal deep-range execution resulted in a massive scoring spike that dictated the game's tempo. Surprisingly stout defensive metrics further amplified this explosive offensive masterclass.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 6/13 (46.2%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.3%
USG% 42.9%
Net Rtg +64.4
+/- +30
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Offense +17.9
Hustle +1.4
Defense +5.7
Raw total +25.0
Avg player in 23.0m -12.1
Impact +12.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
1
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
-3.9

A disastrous shooting night completely neutralized his phenomenal hustle and defensive contributions. Bricking every single perimeter look allowed defenders to aggressively sag off him, which severely stalled the half-court offense. His elite effort metrics simply couldn't overcome the structural damage caused by his total lack of scoring gravity.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 8.5%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg +2.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +6.5
Defense +4.8
Raw total +9.6
Avg player in 25.3m -13.5
Impact -3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Ryan Dunn 24.9m
10
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.7

Suffocating point-of-attack defense and relentless hustle defined a highly impactful two-way showing. Disrupting offensive sets with his length allowed him to generate stops, while opportunistically converting his limited touches exceeded his usual scoring average. This gritty, glue-guy performance perfectly bridged the gap between the team's primary scorers.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.1%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +23.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.9m
Offense +10.6
Hustle +3.7
Defense +5.6
Raw total +19.9
Avg player in 24.9m -13.2
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Oso Ighodaro 11.6m
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.9

Extreme offensive passivity snapped a long streak of highly efficient finishing and dragged his net impact slightly into the red. Completely vanishing as a scoring threat meant he failed to pressure the rim or capitalize on typical pick-and-roll feeds. While his hustle metrics remained strong, this sudden lack of interior gravity hurt the second unit's flow.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.8%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +2.9
Defense +1.1
Raw total +5.3
Avg player in 11.6m -6.2
Impact -0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

A severe lack of offensive involvement fundamentally limited his ability to positively influence the game. Rarely touching the ball in scoring positions led to a sharp drop-off from his usual production, hindering the bench unit's interior threat. Despite adequate defensive positioning, his sheer invisibility on offense drove his impact into the negative.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.8%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.4m
Offense -0.3
Hustle +1.0
Defense +1.8
Raw total +2.5
Avg player in 11.4m -6.1
Impact -3.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Forcing bad shots during a brief rotation stint resulted in a highly detrimental performance that cratered his overall impact. Failing to convert any of his looks actively killed offensive momentum, while his subpar defensive resistance compounded the issue. This toxic combination of empty possessions and poor positioning made him a massive negative on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -96.8
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Offense -3.8
Hustle +0.8
Defense -1.1
Raw total -4.1
Avg player in 10.6m -5.6
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Relegated to pure garbage time, he simply ran the floor without registering a single meaningful statistic. His slightly negative impact score is purely a byproduct of the team bleeding a quick basket during his brief seconds of action. He had absolutely zero opportunity to influence the game's actual outcome.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

A blink-and-you-miss-it appearance at the end of the bench yielded no tangible production. His slightly negative rating stems entirely from a minor defensive breakdown by the unit during the final minute of play. This was a non-factor stint defined entirely by the game clock expiring.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.1
Raw total -0.1
Avg player in 1.1m -0.7
Impact -0.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Inserted solely to run out the clock, his presence on the court was purely ceremonial. The marginal negative impact reflects a single opponent score during this mop-up duty rather than any individual failure. He quite literally just existed on the hardwood for sixty-nine seconds to finish out the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.1m -0.6
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S Ivica Zubac 27.1m
23
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.4

Total domination of the interior paint defined this performance, overwhelming the opposing frontcourt with high-percentage finishes. His massive offensive footprint was perfectly complemented by elite rim deterrence and consistent hustle metrics, resulting in a stellar overall impact.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg -22.4
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Offense +21.9
Hustle +2.0
Defense +5.8
Raw total +29.7
Avg player in 27.1m -14.3
Impact +15.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Kris Dunn 23.8m
9
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+3.0

Elite defensive disruption and high-energy hustle plays set the tone for his highly effective minutes. He perfectly picked his spots offensively to generate a massive scoring surge over his usual baseline without hijacking the offense. This flawless two-way efficiency made him a vital connective piece in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -57.0
+/- -27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Offense +8.8
Hustle +3.4
Defense +3.3
Raw total +15.5
Avg player in 23.8m -12.5
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
10
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.8

Opportunistic shot selection fueled a massive scoring spike compared to his recent offensive struggles. He capitalized perfectly on defensive rotations by burying his catch-and-shoot looks from deep, keeping his overall impact in the green.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 9.6%
Net Rtg -54.3
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Offense +9.4
Hustle +0.8
Defense +2.3
Raw total +12.5
Avg player in 22.1m -11.7
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Bradley Beal 19.6m
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.5

Disastrous shot selection and a barrage of bricked jumpers absolutely cratered his overall impact. Forcing up contested looks derailed the team's offensive rhythm, creating empty possessions that the opposition easily exploited. This brutal shooting slump completely negated any marginal hustle contributions he offered.

Shooting
FG 2/14 (14.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 17.9%
USG% 34.0%
Net Rtg -56.1
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Offense -8.2
Hustle +1.0
Defense +0.1
Raw total -7.1
Avg player in 19.6m -10.4
Impact -17.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Nicolas Batum 18.4m
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

A complete offensive disappearing act defined his stint, as he failed to convert any of his perimeter looks. This total lack of scoring gravity severely cramped the floor for his teammates, dragging his overall impact deep into the red despite passable defensive positioning.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -40.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Offense -1.9
Hustle +1.0
Defense +0.9
Raw total +0.0
Avg player in 18.4m -9.7
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
12
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.1

Despite a noticeable scoring bump from his recent baseline, inefficient perimeter execution ultimately dragged his net impact into the negative. Settling for heavily contested outside looks rather than pressuring the rim frequently stalled out the team's momentum. Those empty offensive trips ultimately outweighed his otherwise solid defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +12.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +8.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.8
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 28.4m -15.0
Impact -3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Cam Christie 25.1m
17
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.3

An explosive, out-of-nowhere scoring surge completely transformed the team's offensive dynamic during his minutes. Attacking closeouts with ruthless efficiency allowed him to shatter his usual scoring baseline while maintaining near-perfect shot selection. This sudden offensive eruption, backed by solid defensive execution, drove a stellar positive impact.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 84.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +21.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +15.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.0
Raw total +20.5
Avg player in 25.1m -13.2
Impact +7.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
John Collins 23.1m
13
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.6

Strong defensive rotations and active hustle kept him engaged, but a dip in his usual finishing efficiency held back his overall rating. Missing several contested looks in the paint broke a recent streak of highly efficient outings and left points on the board. Consequently, his two-way impact hovered just below neutral despite the strong defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 52.8%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -15.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +3.2
Defense +5.4
Raw total +11.6
Avg player in 23.1m -12.2
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
Brook Lopez 17.8m
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.4

A complete inability to stretch the floor from deep severely cramped the offense and dragged his impact into the red. While his rim protection and hustle remained solid, his perimeter bricks allowed opposing bigs to comfortably pack the paint. This sharp drop-off from his usual scoring output fundamentally disrupted the unit's overall spacing.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.8m
Offense +0.7
Hustle +2.2
Defense +3.1
Raw total +6.0
Avg player in 17.8m -9.4
Impact -3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Kobe Brown 15.9m
0
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.0

A sudden and complete offensive vanishing act tanked his overall rating, snapping a strong streak of highly efficient performances. Passing up open looks and failing to pressure the defense rendered him a total non-factor on that end of the floor. Even decent rebounding and defensive positioning couldn't salvage a stint defined by this extreme passivity.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg +16.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.9m
Offense +0.2
Hustle +0.8
Defense +1.4
Raw total +2.4
Avg player in 15.9m -8.4
Impact -6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Chris Paul 9.5m
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.5

Masterful defensive positioning and quick-twitch hustle plays defined his brief stint on the floor. Even with minimal offensive usage, his ability to organize the half-court and disrupt passing lanes generated a positive net rating. He proved that veteran savvy can heavily influence a game's rhythm in under ten minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +16.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.5m
Offense +1.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.1
Raw total +7.5
Avg player in 9.5m -5.0
Impact +2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.4

Bleeding points during a brief, highly ineffective rotation stint doomed his net impact. He offered zero resistance defensively and failed to register a single hustle play to swing momentum. This empty-calorie appearance actively hurt the team's flow on both ends of the court before he was pulled.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 18.1%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg +46.8
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Offense -4.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.6
Raw total -4.9
Avg player in 6.5m -3.5
Impact -8.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.0

Flawless execution around the basket defined a hyper-efficient cameo appearance. He immediately capitalized on his limited touches, finishing strong inside while holding his own defensively. This quick burst of perfect shooting provided a noticeable jolt of positive impact in under three minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 40.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Offense +4.0
Hustle +0.2
Defense +1.2
Raw total +5.4
Avg player in 2.6m -1.4
Impact +4.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0