NOP

2025-26 Season

TREY MURPHY III

New Orleans Pelicans | Forward | 6-8
Trey Murphy III
21.5 PPG
5.7 RPG
3.8 APG
35.5 MPG
+2.5 Impact

III produces at an above average rate for a 36-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.2/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.5
Scoring +14.1
Points 21.5 PPG × +1.00 = +21.5
Missed 2PT 3.1/g × -0.78 = -2.4
Missed 3PT 5.3/g × -0.87 = -4.6
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +3.7
Assists 3.8/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +3.2
Steals 1.5/g × +2.30 = +3.4
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 4.3/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.4
Contested Shots 4.8/g × +0.20 = +1.0
Deflections 2.8/g × +0.65 = +1.8
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.6/g × +0.30 = +0.2
Raw Impact +20.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −18.4
Net Impact
+2.5
79th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 94th
21.5 PPG
Efficiency 79th
60.9% TS
Playmaking 89th
3.8 APG
Rebounding 78th
5.7 RPG
Rim Protection 57th
0.15/min
Hustle 29th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 39th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Trey Murphy III’s first twenty games were a wildly erratic rollercoaster, swinging violently between an emerging offensive alpha and a frustratingly inefficient volume chucker. When his shot selection clicked, he was utterly unguardable. He erupted for 41 points and a massive +24.8 impact on 11/08 vs SAS, riding an offensive explosion fueled by elite shot-making. Yet he frequently sabotaged his own box score with awful decisions. During a 20-point outing on 11/24 vs CHI, he posted a disappointing -1.3 impact because he constantly settled for contested, early-clock perimeter shots that short-circuited promising offensive runs. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to contribute when his jumper abandoned him. On 11/05 vs DAL, he managed a +0.3 impact despite scoring just 11 points on a brutal 3/12 shooting night, keeping his head above water through engaged defense and sheer hustle. To take the next leap, Murphy must eradicate those hidden offensive costs and stop letting his jump shot dictate his overall value.

Extreme volatility defined Trey Murphy III's mid-season run, swinging wildly between offensive mastery and frustrating, self-inflicted wounds. When he was dialed in, he looked utterly unstoppable. Look no further than 01/09 vs WAS, where he poured in 35 points and generated a staggering +22.4 impact score by relentlessly punishing drop coverage. However, high scoring totals sometimes masked glaring hidden costs. During the 12/29 vs NYK matchup, Murphy dropped 21 points on five made threes, yet posted a brutal -7.7 impact because live-ball turnovers and lazy transition defense completely undercut his offensive output. Conversely, he found ways to salvage his value even when his perimeter touch vanished. On 12/04 vs MIN, he missed all five of his three-point attempts but still managed a +3.1 impact by pivoting beautifully into a gritty playmaking and defensive role. Murphy is a lethal weapon when his shot selection is pristine, but his overall footprint bleeds value the moment he settles for contested looks or ignores the margins.

A wild rollercoaster of extreme shooting variances defined this midseason stretch for Trey Murphy III, oscillating violently between disastrous shot-chucking and transcendent two-way dominance. When his shot selection soured, the results were catastrophic. During a brutal 01/30 vs MEM matchup, he forced multiple heavily contested looks to finish with just 8 points on 2-of-14 shooting, generating a miserable -13.2 impact score that actively shot his team out of the game. Even when he managed respectable scoring totals, a lack of efficiency often dragged down his actual value. He dropped 19 points on 01/31 vs PHI, but posted a -6.3 impact score because clanking 13 of his 21 field goal attempts severely damaged his offensive footprint. Yet, when he paired his lethal floor-spacing with engaged defense, he looked completely unstoppable. He delivered an absolute masterclass on 02/04 vs MIL, burying 12 three-pointers for 44 points and a staggering +21.1 impact score driven by elite shot selection and suffocating point-of-attack defense. Ultimately, Murphy is a terrifying weapon, but his nightly value hinges entirely on whether he reads the defense or recklessly forces the issue.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. III's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~8 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 59% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. III consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

In a rough stretch — 4 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. McDaniels 84.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 9
N. Clifford 82.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
M. Christie 77.6 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
D. Vassell 74.6 poss
FG% 26.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 11
J. Wells 70.2 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
J. Champagnie 64.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.33
PTS 21
D. Jones Jr. 61.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
J. Smith Jr. 59.3 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
D. Brooks 57.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 18
M. Bridges 56.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. McDaniels 80.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
D. Vassell 77.4 poss
FG% 23.1%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 9
J. Wells 75.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 7
R. O'Neale 67.6 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.16
PTS 11
S. Castle 67.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
D. Jones Jr. 67.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 18
J. Smith Jr. 59.6 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 17
C. Flagg 58.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 14
A. Reaves 49.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
M. Christie 49.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

66
Games
21.5
PPG
5.7
RPG
3.8
APG
1.5
SPG
0.4
BPG
47.0
FG%
37.9
3P%
88.6
FT%
35.5
MPG

GAME LOG

66 games played