PHX

2025-26 Season

RASHEER FLEMING

Phoenix Suns | Forward | 6-9
Rasheer Fleming
4.2 PPG
2.3 RPG
0.2 APG
11.7 MPG
-0.8 Impact

Fleming produces at an average rate for a 12-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.8
Scoring +2.0
Points 4.2 PPG × +1.00 = +4.2
Missed 2PT 0.8/g × -0.78 = -0.6
Missed 3PT 1.5/g × -0.87 = -1.3
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +0.9
Assists 0.2/g × +0.50 = +0.1
Off. Rebounds 0.6/g × +1.26 = +0.8
Turnovers -0.8
Turnovers 0.4/g × -1.95 = -0.8
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 1.7/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.2
Contested Shots 1.8/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.1/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Raw Impact +3.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −4.0
Net Impact
-0.8
41st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 19th
5.4 PPG
Efficiency 21th
51.8% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.3 APG
Rebounding 20th
2.7 RPG
Rim Protection 37th
0.13/min
Hustle 45th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 82th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Rasheer Fleming’s first twenty games of the season were defined by a maddeningly erratic battle for rotation minutes, swinging wildly between decisive rim-running and disastrous shot selection. Physicality was his only saving grace. During the 12/23 vs LAL matchup, he posted a stellar +6.0 impact score by aggressively attacking closeouts and finishing with authority to tally 7 points in just 10 minutes. However, even when he managed to score, poor decisions frequently dragged his overall value into the gutter. Look no further than the 12/27 vs NOP contest, where he scored 5 points but generated a catastrophic -8.1 impact score because he stubbornly settled for contested perimeter jumpers rather than attacking the paint. Defense offered a different story. Against the Rockets on 12/05 vs HOU, Fleming managed a +2.2 impact score despite scoring only 3 points on an abysmal 1-for-5 shooting performance. Elite rim protection and timely defensive rotations salvaged his value that night, revealing the gritty, blue-collar player he must become to survive in this league.

Rasheer Fleming’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility as he desperately tried to graduate from mop-up duty into a reliable rotational floor-spacer. The growing pains were often brutal. This peaked during a disastrous 02/24 vs BOS matchup where he spent 21 agonizing minutes actively hurting his own squad. Getting bullied off his spots defensively compounded a completely barren zero-point offensive night, dragging him down to an abysmal -10.2 impact score. Yet, when his jumper actually fell, he transformed into a lethal weapon off the bench. On 03/08 vs CHA, he punished the defense from the trail spot by drilling four deep balls, racking up 16 points and a massive +10.1 impact score. He even managed to dominate without high volume on 03/13 vs TOR, where flawless 3-for-3 perimeter execution combined with suffocating defensive rotations fueled a stellar +9.9 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Fleming's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~4 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Fleming doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -0.7, second-half -0.8. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

Z. Williamson 28.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
P. Nance 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
S. Cissoko 15.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Olynyk 15.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Slawson 14.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
B. Ingram 14.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Queen 14.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 5
B. Carrington 13.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Bal 13.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
L. Dončić 13.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Williamson 22.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
P. Pritchard 21.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 7
P. Nance 19.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
L. Dončić 15.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
S. Jones 15.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
S. Bey 15.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
K. Williams 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 13.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
R. Barrett 13.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 4
K. Chandler 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

51
Games
4.2
PPG
2.3
RPG
0.2
APG
0.4
SPG
0.4
BPG
40.7
FG%
34.5
3P%
56.2
FT%
11.7
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played