GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Royce O'Neale 30.1m
7
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.8

Superb weak-side rotations and relentless activity in the passing lanes (+8.6 Def) salvaged his value on a cold shooting night. He consistently made the extra rotation to contest corner shooters, erasing mistakes made by the primary defenders. Those high-motor hustle plays kept his impact in the black despite clanking multiple open looks from deep.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg +31.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Offense +4.5
Hustle +5.8
Defense +8.6
Raw total +18.9
Avg player in 30.1m -16.1
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 0
S Devin Booker 27.7m
33
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.1

A masterclass in mid-range shot creation absolutely torched the opposing drop coverage. Even with his three-point shot failing to fall, his ability to snake pick-and-rolls and hit contested pull-ups carried the offensive load. He dictated the tempo of the game entirely through his methodical half-court probing.

Shooting
FG 13/21 (61.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 41.8%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Offense +18.3
Hustle +1.4
Defense +3.2
Raw total +22.9
Avg player in 27.7m -14.8
Impact +8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
15
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+7.0

Tenacious ball pressure against the opposing guards (+7.9 Def) completely disrupted the enemy's offensive initiation. He leveraged that defensive energy into confident transition pull-ups, snapping out of a brutal shooting slump. Operating as a steadying presence, his timely kick-outs kept the secondary unit humming.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +38.1
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.1m
Offense +10.2
Hustle +2.8
Defense +7.9
Raw total +20.9
Avg player in 26.1m -13.9
Impact +7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dillon Brooks 25.4m
18
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.7

Punished late closeouts with decisive drives to the basket, breaking out of a recent shooting slump. His physical point-of-attack defense set a rugged tone that disrupted the opposing backcourt's rhythm. By avoiding the contested, early-clock jumpers that usually hurt his efficiency, he maintained a steady positive influence.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +14.4
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Offense +14.9
Hustle +3.4
Defense +1.1
Raw total +19.4
Avg player in 25.4m -13.7
Impact +5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Mark Williams 21.7m
15
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.9

Dominated the interior by establishing deep post position and drawing a barrage of shooting fouls. His vertical spacing as a roll man forced the defense to collapse, opening up the perimeter for his teammates. Altering a handful of shots at the rim (+4.1 Def) capped off a highly efficient, physical shift.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 84.8%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Offense +13.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.1
Raw total +20.5
Avg player in 21.7m -11.6
Impact +8.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.4

Absolute havoc creation on the defensive end (+11.2 Def) defined a breakout performance that blew his recent averages out of the water. He turned deflections into instant offense, leaking out for easy transition layups before the defense could react. His relentless energy on 50/50 balls (+7.2 Hustle) single-handedly tilted the possession battle in his team's favor.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg +42.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Offense +10.2
Hustle +7.2
Defense +11.2
Raw total +28.6
Avg player in 22.9m -12.2
Impact +16.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.6

Despite highly efficient shot selection, his overall impact slipped due to costly defensive miscommunications in transition. He over-helped on drives, leaving corner shooters wide open during critical momentum swings. A lack of aggression in looking for his own offense allowed defenders to sag off and clog the passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +6.5
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Offense +7.5
Hustle +0.8
Defense +1.2
Raw total +9.5
Avg player in 22.7m -12.1
Impact -2.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Oso Ighodaro 20.5m
15
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.6

Flawless execution as a pick-and-roll finisher punished the defense every time they trapped the ball-handler. His phenomenal rim protection (+10.4 Def) completely deterred guards from challenging him in the paint. By combining hyper-efficient touch around the basket with suffocating drop coverage, he engineered a massive swing in momentum.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 91.5%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg +29.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Offense +14.6
Hustle +3.5
Defense +10.4
Raw total +28.5
Avg player in 20.5m -10.9
Impact +17.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
Ryan Dunn 17.9m
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.1

Offensive invisibility plagued his minutes, as he routinely hid in the dunker spot rather than making decisive cuts. Without the ball in his hands, his defender was free to roam and muck up the primary actions. Even a few solid closeouts on the perimeter couldn't rescue a stint defined by complete passivity.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +15.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.9m
Offense -2.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Raw total +1.5
Avg player in 17.9m -9.6
Impact -8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

Forcing contested shots early in the shot clock derailed the offensive flow and tanked his overall rating. Continuing a brutal scoreless streak, his lack of confidence was palpable as he hesitated on open looks before driving into traffic. He became an active liability when his missed jumpers repeatedly sparked fast breaks going the other way.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +35.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Offense -2.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.3
Raw total -0.5
Avg player in 11.5m -6.1
Impact -6.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Struggled to find the pace of the game during a disjointed first-half cameo. A blown defensive rotation and a rushed perimeter miss highlighted a shift where he looked a step slow. The coaching staff quickly pulled the plug before he could settle into any sort of rhythm.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg +30.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.0m
Offense -0.9
Hustle +0.2
Defense +1.4
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 6.0m -3.2
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.5

Maximized every second of his brief run by providing instant, suffocating rim protection (+4.8 Def). He deterred multiple drives simply through verticality, altering the geometry of the opponent's spacing. Cleaning up the offensive glass for a quick putback cemented a highly productive micro-shift.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Offense +3.6
Hustle +1.0
Defense +4.8
Raw total +9.4
Avg player in 5.3m -2.9
Impact +6.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.1

Logged purely incidental minutes at the end of a quarter, merely serving as a placeholder. The ball never found him, and he was not involved in any primary actions on either side of the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +60.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 2.1m -1.1
Impact -1.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAC Sacramento Kings
S Keegan Murray 32.6m
23
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.2

Efficient perimeter shot-making anchored a robust offensive rating, keeping his overall impact firmly in the green. His defensive rotations and active hands (+5.2 Def) consistently disrupted opponent sets on the wing. This combination of reliable floor spacing and point-of-attack containment defined his strong two-way value.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense +5.2
Raw total +22.5
Avg player in 32.6m -17.3
Impact +5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S DeMar DeRozan 29.9m
13
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.9

Uncharacteristic offensive hesitancy limited his usual gravity, resulting in a disappointing net negative score. The offense stalled when he settled for contested isolation jumpers rather than attacking the rim to draw contact. Without his typical parade to the free-throw line, the half-court execution lacked its usual safety valve.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg -23.9
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Offense +4.6
Hustle +1.1
Defense +4.4
Raw total +10.1
Avg player in 29.9m -16.0
Impact -5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
17
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+5.7

Relentless downhill pressure generated consistent rim-gravity, spiking his offensive impact well above his recent baseline. He controlled the tempo beautifully in transition, punishing retreating defenders before they could set up. Avoiding the erratic perimeter shots that usually tank his efficiency allowed his playmaking to shine.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.9%
USG% 26.5%
Net Rtg -17.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +3.0
Raw total +19.7
Avg player in 26.0m -14.0
Impact +5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Maxime Raynaud 25.4m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.1

Despite posting respectable defensive and hustle metrics, his overall rating slipped into the red due to offensive passivity. He passed up several open looks from the mid-range, bogging down the half-court spacing. A sharp drop-off in aggression compared to his recent scoring tear made him a non-factor on the block.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/4 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.2%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -31.6
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Offense +3.8
Hustle +2.2
Defense +3.4
Raw total +9.4
Avg player in 25.4m -13.5
Impact -4.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.8

A severe regression to the mean dragged his overall impact into the basement after a recent stretch of hyper-efficient finishing. Forcing contested looks in the paint resulted in empty possessions that fueled transition opportunities the other way. His inability to establish deep post position completely derailed his offensive rhythm.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 16.9%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -22.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Offense -2.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.5
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 18.8m -9.9
Impact -10.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Keon Ellis 34.5m
14
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Elite point-of-attack defense and high-motor closeouts (+5.2 Def) were entirely undone by poor finishing inside the arc. He consistently beat the first line of defense but threw up wild floaters in traffic that acted as live-ball turnovers. The raw scoring bump was a mirage masking how many empty possessions he authored.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.9%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -19.6
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Offense +1.4
Hustle +4.7
Defense +5.2
Raw total +11.3
Avg player in 34.5m -18.5
Impact -7.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
12
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.3

Over-dribbling at the top of the key stagnated the second unit, dragging his overall impact deep into the negative. He repeatedly forced the issue against set drop coverages, resulting in clanked mid-range pull-ups that sparked opponent breaks. A lack of defensive resistance at the point of attack further compounded his inefficient offensive shifts.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -24.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Offense +3.7
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.4
Raw total +4.5
Avg player in 24.0m -12.8
Impact -8.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.7

A complete lack of offensive assertiveness resulted in a cratered impact score during his time on the floor. He routinely passed out of advantageous driving lanes, allowing the defense to reset and blowing up the shot clock. Floating on the perimeter instead of crashing the glass rendered him virtually invisible on both ends.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg -9.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.6m
Offense -4.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.4
Raw total -3.8
Avg player in 18.6m -9.9
Impact -13.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.3

Bricking a series of wide-open catch-and-shoot looks neutralized his sole purpose on the floor, tanking his overall rating. Opponents aggressively chased him off the line, and his inability to counter with decisive cuts bogged down the spacing. Being targeted on switches defensively only magnified the damage from his cold shooting night.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -37.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Offense -1.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.5
Raw total -0.8
Avg player in 15.8m -8.5
Impact -9.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.9

Maximized a brief rotation stint by playing strictly within his role as a rim-runner and lob threat. Drawing fouls deep in the paint yielded highly efficient trips to the charity stripe, boosting his box impact. He set bruising screens that freed up the guards, providing a quick jolt of functional half-court offense.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 95.2%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.9m
Offense +8.3
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.5
Raw total +9.2
Avg player in 9.9m -5.3
Impact +3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.1

Barely broke a sweat in a fleeting cameo that left no meaningful imprint on the game's outcome. A forced, out-of-rhythm jumper early in his shift was his only real involvement before being pulled. Failed to generate any defensive pressure during his brief run.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -30.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Offense +0.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.2
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 4.5m -2.4
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0