GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 32.7m
27
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+21.7

Methodical mid-range execution and elite defensive positioning drove a massive positive impact across his heavy minutes. He systematically broke down defenders in isolation, generating high-quality looks that stabilized the entire offense. This signature two-way dominance was the defining factor in controlling the game's tempo and securing the advantage.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +10.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +19.7
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S James Harden 28.4m
30
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+22.8

Masterful shot creation and lethal perimeter efficiency orchestrated a dominant offensive showing that broke him out of a recent scoring lull. He ruthlessly exploited mismatches on the perimeter, burying contested threes and generating massive box score value. His ability to dictate the entire offense with minimal wasted possessions drove an elite overall impact score.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 9/9 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 94.0%
USG% 31.1%
Net Rtg +35.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +27.3
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -8.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Ivica Zubac 24.7m
8
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.7

Despite efficient finishing on his limited touches, a severe lack of rebounding presence dragged his net rating into the abyss. He was routinely exploited in the pick-and-roll, bleeding points defensively that completely negated his modest offensive output. His inability to anchor the paint with authority allowed opponents free reign in the restricted area.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 63.3%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +24.8
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
17
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+17.5

A flawless shooting performance from beyond the arc fueled an astronomical spike in his offensive value and overall impact. He completely shattered his recent shooting slump by punishing every defensive rotation with perfect efficiency. This unexpected perimeter explosion, combined with solid defensive rotations, made him the ultimate x-factor in this matchup.

Shooting
FG 6/6 (100.0%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 141.7%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +17.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +2.2
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Bradley Beal 20.1m
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.9

Exceptional hustle metrics salvaged a bizarrely passive offensive performance to keep his overall impact in the green. He deferred constantly on offense, but his relentless energy chasing loose balls and fighting through screens proved highly valuable. It was a gritty, blue-collar shift that perfectly compensated for his uncharacteristic lack of scoring volume.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +7.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
John Collins 24.0m
10
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.7

Continuing a reliable streak of highly efficient interior play, he combined smart shot selection with excellent defensive positioning. He thrived as a constant lob threat and weak-side helper, maximizing his touches without ever forcing the issue. This highly disciplined two-way performance provided tremendous stability to the frontcourt rotation.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +41.3
+/- +23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.0m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +7.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Kris Dunn 21.5m
14
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+16.1

Operating as an absolute menace at the point of attack, he generated massive defensive value that consistently fueled transition opportunities. He paired this elite defensive pressure with a shocking surge in shooting efficiency, punishing defenders who dared to sag off him. This unexpected two-way masterclass completely flipped the momentum of the game during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg +40.0
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.5m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +6.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Chris Paul 19.6m
0
pts
3
reb
8
ast
Impact
-0.4

Orchestrating the offense brilliantly without ever looking at the rim, he relied entirely on elite playmaking and defensive intelligence. His ability to read passing lanes and organize the half-court defense resulted in a stellar defensive rating. It was a pure floor-general performance that generated positive value despite a literal zero in the scoring column.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 6.5%
Net Rtg +15.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +6.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
Brook Lopez 18.4m
6
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.6

Strong drop-coverage defense and active hustle metrics were offset by a sharp decline in his usual offensive production. He settled almost exclusively for perimeter looks, failing to punish smaller defenders inside or generate high-percentage attempts. This distinct lack of interior scoring gravity ultimately kept his net impact hovering just below zero.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +33.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +3.1
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.5

Executing basic connective passes and maintaining defensive structure, he played a perfectly neutral stint off the bench. He didn't significantly move the needle offensively, but he successfully avoided the costly mistakes that plagued his recent shooting slump. It was a textbook definition of a placeholder performance that kept the ship steady.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +69.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.3m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

Perfect execution around the basket provided an instant offensive spark during his extremely limited minutes. He capitalized on every single touch he received, overpowering defenders in the paint to drive a highly positive box score impact. This flawless interior finishing completely masked a noticeable lack of defensive resistance on the other end.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.6

Continuing a brutal stretch of offensive futility, he failed to generate any positive momentum during his short stint. His inability to create separation or hit open looks resulted in empty possessions that severely tanked his net rating. He remains entirely out of rhythm, offering zero hustle metrics to offset the ongoing scoring drought.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Brown 4.8m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

A jarring disappearance from the offense completely snapped his impressive streak of highly efficient scoring performances. He was entirely invisible during his brief run, failing to register a single hustle play or even attempt a shot. This extreme passivity resulted in dead possessions and dragged his overall impact into the negative.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Poor shot selection marred a brief stint on the floor, abruptly snapping his recent run of hyper-efficient finishing. He forced bad looks early in the clock, squandering valuable possessions and dragging down his box score impact. Despite decent defensive positioning, these offensive misfires ultimately dictated his negative overall rating.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 36.4%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Grayson Allen 28.7m
12
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.6

Errant perimeter shooting plagued his offensive rhythm, extending a multi-game slump of poor efficiency that dragged his net score down. Despite solid defensive metrics and active playmaking, the sheer volume of missed outside looks proved too costly. His inability to punish closeouts consistently forced the offense into stagnant possessions.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.2%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg -21.3
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Devin Booker 27.9m
18
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+4.8

Taking a noticeable backseat offensively compared to his usual dominant volume, he functioned more as a facilitator to generate positive value. Excellent hustle metrics and careful shot selection compensated for the sharp drop in his typical scoring load. By picking his spots rather than forcing contested looks, he secured a modest but effective overall contribution.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -33.5
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +14.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Dillon Brooks 26.6m
21
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.7

Breaking out of a recent shooting slump, his aggressive perimeter shot selection finally paid dividends to drive a strong box score impact. The heavy reliance on the three-ball fueled a massive scoring surge compared to his recent averages. However, a relatively muted defensive rating kept his overall net impact from climbing into elite territory.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.7%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -25.6
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Oso Ighodaro 20.4m
9
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

Continuing a reliable pattern of highly efficient interior finishing, he provided steady but low-volume offensive value. Strong hustle numbers and capable defensive rotations kept him floating right around neutral. Ultimately, a lack of aggressive offensive involvement prevented him from tipping the scales into a positive overall impact.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -5.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +5.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ryan Dunn 16.8m
6
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.9

Defensive struggles severely undercut an otherwise efficient offensive outing, dragging his net impact into the red. Poor positioning and missed rotations on the defensive end completely erased the value of his solid hustle metrics. He capitalized on his limited touches around the rim but gave it all back on the other side of the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -13.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.8m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
13
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.5

Bouncing back from a brutal shooting slump with improved aggression, he found a better offensive rhythm but still lacked true efficiency. Strong defensive metrics and active hustle plays were ultimately offset by a high volume of missed perimeter attempts. The scoring surge masked underlying possession-killers that kept his net impact in the red.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 22.1%
Net Rtg -30.5
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
11
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.0

A heavy diet of bricked three-pointers cratered his offensive value, generating too many empty possessions to overcome. The sheer volume of missed perimeter looks completely overwhelmed his highly rated defensive contributions. Ultimately, his typical defensive versatility couldn't salvage a performance defined by poor shot-making.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
7
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.8

Elite defensive execution and highly efficient shot selection drove a stellar positive impact despite a low usage rate. He thrived as a seamless connector, making virtually zero mistakes while anchoring the perimeter defense during his shifts. His ability to dictate the game's flow without demanding the ball was a masterclass in role-player efficiency.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg -30.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Scoring +6.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense +7.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

Completely losing his touch around the rim, he suffered a massive drop-off in finishing efficiency compared to his previous dominant outing. Poor defensive positioning compounded these offensive struggles, leading to a heavily negative overall rating. His inability to finish through contact inside derailed several key half-court possessions.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -51.2
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.9m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +5.7
Defense -5.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.9

A sharp decline in offensive involvement and missed interior looks neutralized his brief stint on the floor. While he provided a solid spark of rim protection, his inability to capitalize on offensive touches resulted in a slight negative impact. He consistently struggled to establish deep post position against physical coverage during his limited run.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -41.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.8

Operating as an absolute zero offensively, he failed to convert on his rare attempts and bogged down the team's half-court execution. Marginal hustle and defensive contributions couldn't mask the dead weight of his completely scoreless minutes. He appeared entirely out of sync with the offensive flow, passing up open looks and taking poor angles.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg -6.3
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.6

A disastrous offensive cameo highlighted by forced, errant perimeter shots completely tanked his box score impact. Even a relatively sturdy defensive rating couldn't salvage a stint where he actively harmed the team's spacing and momentum. His poor shot selection early in the shot clock was the primary culprit for a steep negative overall score.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 38.5%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.1m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
1
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

Barely registering a pulse during his brief appearance, he offered zero field goal attempts and minimal physical presence. His lack of aggression on the glass and failure to alter shots inside resulted in a quietly negative overall impact. He was effectively a ghost on the floor, failing to disrupt the opponent's rhythm or create any spacing.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0