Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MEM lead PHX lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHX 2P — 3P —
MEM 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 189 attempts

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Brooks Hard 8/22 -0.5
Booker 6/15 -2.7
Allen Hard 7/13 +5.0
Goodwin Hard 4/12 -1.6
O'Neale Hard 4/9 +3.1
Gillespie 4/6 +3.2
Williams Open 5/6 +2.1
Dunn 0/5 -6.0
Fleming 3/4 +3.2
Richards Open 2/2 +1.8

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Jackson Jr. 9/19 -1.6
Wells 4/12 -4.0
Spencer Hard 5/11 +3.1
Caldwell-Pope Hard 5/10 +2.4
Small Hard 5/8 +5.2
Prosper Open 4/8 -2.1
Aldama 3/8 -3.3
Jackson Hard 3/7 +0.9
Landale Hard 0/5 -4.8
Koloko Open 1/3 -1.7
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHX
MEM
45/97 Field Goals 39/92
46.4% Field Goal % 42.4%
22/56 3-Pointers 12/37
39.3% 3-Point % 32.4%
5/8 Free Throws 8/14
62.5% Free Throw % 57.1%
58.2% True Shooting % 49.9%
58 Total Rebounds 56
15 Offensive 15
36 Defensive 32
31 Assists 23
1.72 Assist/TO Ratio 1.28
16 Turnovers 18
11 Steals 9
5 Blocks 2
17 Fouls 11
44 Points in Paint 44
25 Fast Break Pts 10
25 Points off TOs 17
20 Second Chance Pts 17
49 Bench Points 45
26 Largest Lead 4
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jordan Goodwin
11 PTS · 8 REB · 6 AST · 22.7 MIN
+18.03
2
Mark Williams
12 PTS · 12 REB · 1 AST · 26.6 MIN
+17.72
3
Jaren Jackson Jr.
19 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 29.2 MIN
+16.93
4
Royce O'Neale
12 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 26.9 MIN
+15.19
5
Dillon Brooks
21 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 25.0 MIN
+12.81
6
Collin Gillespie
10 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 27.6 MIN
+12.69
7
Cam Spencer
14 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 27.4 MIN
+11.27
8
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
14 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 16.7 MIN
+10.06
9
Rasheer Fleming
8 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 9.1 MIN
+8.24
10
Devin Booker
13 PTS · 1 REB · 8 AST · 30.5 MIN
+8.08
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:03 PHX shot clock Team TURNOVER 117–98
Q4 0:27 J. Small 25' 3PT step back (14 PTS) 117–98
Q4 0:41 N. Richards cutting DUNK (4 PTS) (J. Goodwin 6 AST) 117–95
Q4 0:53 O. Prosper running DUNK (8 PTS) 115–95
Q4 0:54 O. Prosper STEAL (1 STL) 115–93
Q4 0:54 I. Livers bad pass TURNOVER (1 TO) 115–93
Q4 1:08 R. Fleming REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 115–93
Q4 1:11 MISS O. Prosper 3PT 115–93
Q4 1:16 N. Richards offensive foul TURNOVER (1 TO) 115–93
Q4 1:16 N. Richards charge offensive FOUL (1 PF) 115–93
Q4 1:20 N. Richards STEAL (1 STL) 115–93
Q4 1:20 J. Small bad pass TURNOVER (5 TO) 115–93
Q4 1:29 R. Fleming 3PT (8 PTS) (J. Goodwin 5 AST) 115–93
Q4 1:45 J. Small 10' driving floating Jump Shot (11 PTS) 112–93
Q4 1:59 R. Fleming 3PT (5 PTS) (K. Maluach 1 AST) 112–91

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MEM Memphis Grizzlies
19
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+13.0

Anchored the frontcourt with intimidating rim protection that completely altered the opponent's shot profile. Carried a heavy offensive burden, using his size to consistently punish mismatches in the post.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.8%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -22.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 27.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cam Spencer 27.4m
14
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+5.4

Hunting catch-and-shoot opportunities off off-ball screens allowed him to break out of a prolonged scoring funk. His disciplined closeouts and active hands in passing lanes elevated his defensive metrics significantly.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 63.6%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg -13.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jaylen Wells 27.4m
9
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.1

Poor shot selection from the perimeter led to long rebounds and easy transition points for the opposition. Bleeding value on the defensive end compounded his inefficient volume shooting.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.2%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S GG Jackson 25.2m
11
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.7

Struggled to find his typical scoring rhythm, often forcing contested looks early in the shot clock. Despite excellent weak-side defensive rotations, his offensive stagnation dragged his net impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.1%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -28.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jock Landale 21.0m
0
pts
8
reb
4
ast
Impact
-8.1

Brick-heavy offensive sequences and an inability to finish through contact severely hindered the second unit's flow. While his positional defense remained sturdy, the complete lack of scoring gravity made him a liability.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg -8.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring -3.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.4
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

A sharp drop in offensive aggression limited his overall effectiveness, breaking a streak of highly efficient scoring nights. He still provided immense value as a versatile on-ball defender, but the lack of offensive punch resulted in a slightly negative impact.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Santi Aldama 22.2m
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

Settling for contested jumpers rather than attacking closeouts resulted in empty possessions that stalled the offense. He lacked the foot speed to stay in front of quicker forwards, bleeding value on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.4%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -37.2
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Javon Small 20.6m
14
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
-1.3

Efficient scoring and solid playmaking were undone by defensive lapses at the point of attack. He struggled to navigate ball screens, allowing straight-line drives that compromised the entire defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 26.9%
Net Rtg -21.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
2
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.5

Playing to a near-neutral draw, he offered adequate rim deterrence while remaining mostly invisible on offense. He missed a couple of easy bunnies at the rim that kept his impact from turning positive.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.8%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -26.9
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.7

Thriving as a two-way connector, he hit timely perimeter shots to punish defensive over-helps. He navigated screens flawlessly on the other end to neutralize the opponent's primary perimeter threat.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -22.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Defined by poor spacing and a rushed offensive foul, his brief stint was highly erratic. He failed to match the game's intensity, leading to a quick hook from the coaching staff.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -11.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 30.5m
13
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
-1.1

An uncharacteristic inability to generate separation in isolation derailed his offensive rhythm, resulting in a barrage of missed jumpers. While he remained engaged defensively, the sheer volume of empty possessions in the half-court resulted in a net negative outing.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 23.0%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.5m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
10
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.3

Broke out of a recent shooting slump by attacking closeouts rather than settling for contested looks. His surprising effectiveness crashing the defensive glass added crucial hidden value to his minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 11.0%
Net Rtg +20.3
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +9.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Royce O'Neale 26.9m
12
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+13.5

Elite weak-side rotations and timely closeouts generated a massive defensive rating boost. He established a clear pattern of punishing late defensive shifts by capitalizing on perimeter spot-up opportunities.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +15.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.7
Defense +4.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S Mark Williams 26.6m
12
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.1

Vertical spacing and elite rim protection drove a team-high total impact score. His ability to anchor the drop coverage against pick-and-rolls completely stifled opponent drives.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +20.5
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +13.3
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 25.0m
21
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.7

Shot selection was highly questionable, dragging down his overall efficiency despite a massive scoring surge above his recent average. His aggressive on-ball pressure against primary creators kept his defensive metrics afloat, preventing a negative overall impact.

Shooting
FG 8/22 (36.4%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 47.7%
USG% 35.4%
Net Rtg +19.8
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.5
Hustle +5.0
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+14.2

Overcame poor interior finishing by generating massive defensive havoc and pushing the pace in transition. His relentless point-of-attack pressure disrupted opposing sets and fueled a highly positive plus-minus.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.7m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +8.2
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
Ryan Dunn 22.4m
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.6

Offensive invisibility cratered his overall rating, as opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter to pack the paint. He failed to convert any of his looks, making it impossible to justify his minutes despite decent hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
19
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.4

Perimeter gravity opened up driving lanes for teammates, though defensive lapses at the point of attack muted his overall rating. Thriving as a floor spacer, he punished late rotations consistently to generate a positive net margin.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.1%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +29.0
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.7m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
Oso Ighodaro 17.4m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.3

Maintained his streak of hyper-efficient finishing around the basket, taking only high-percentage looks as a roll man. His switchability on the perimeter provided a solid defensive floor, even in a low-usage offensive role.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.4

Maximized a brief rotation stint by converting efficiently as a roll man. Played mistake-free basketball on both ends to provide a steadying presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.1m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Provided a quick jolt of interior physicality during a brief cameo. Sealed off the paint effectively to secure extra possessions and finish dump-off passes.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.4

Looked lost in defensive coverages during a short stint, giving up easy driving angles. Failed to make any tangible impact before being quickly subbed out.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.3

Bleeding points in transition during a disastrous three-minute stretch tanked his rating. Offered zero resistance on the wing and was entirely bypassed on offense.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1