GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ORL Orlando Magic
S Jalen Suggs 37.7m
20
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.3

An absolute terror on the defensive end (+9.0), his point-of-attack pressure completely derailed the opponent's offensive flow. He paired this defensive masterclass with hyper-efficient scoring and relentless hustle (+5.5) to post a massive +8.3 total impact. Forcing turnovers and immediately converting them into transition opportunities defined his dominant two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Offense +8.9
Hustle +5.5
Defense +9.0
Raw total +23.4
Avg player in 37.7m -15.1
Impact +8.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 6
S Desmond Bane 37.3m
21
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.0

High-level hustle (+6.0) and stout perimeter defense (+4.2) kept his overall impact positive despite a clunky shooting night. He compensated for the missed jumpers by constantly fighting through screens and generating extra possessions via loose ball recoveries. His relentless motor ensured he remained a net positive even when his primary weapon wasn't falling.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.3m
Offense +5.8
Hustle +6.0
Defense +4.2
Raw total +16.0
Avg player in 37.3m -15.0
Impact +1.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
S Paolo Banchero 37.1m
19
pts
9
reb
8
ast
Impact
-2.5

Despite solid hustle metrics and decent defensive engagement, his overall impact slipped into the red due to inefficient isolation possessions. Missed interior looks and stalled offensive sets ultimately outweighed his playmaking contributions. The sheer volume of empty possessions in the half-court defined a surprisingly negative overall rating.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 6/9 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 52.9%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Offense +6.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.0
Raw total +12.4
Avg player in 37.1m -14.9
Impact -2.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
15
pts
12
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.3

Superb defensive positioning (+6.2) and highly efficient shot selection drove a strong positive impact. He anchored the paint effectively, deterring drives and cleaning up the glass without needing high offensive usage. Continuing his streak of hyper-efficient shooting, he took exactly what the defense gave him to maximize his floor time.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 74.4%
USG% 21.6%
Net Rtg +10.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense +5.3
Hustle +2.2
Defense +6.2
Raw total +13.7
Avg player in 28.4m -11.4
Impact +2.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 6
9
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.3

A cold streak from the perimeter and overall offensive inefficiency severely dragged down his total impact (-5.3). He struggled to create separation, leading to forced shots that consistently killed offensive momentum. The lack of defensive playmaking meant he had no way to offset his shooting woes.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.5%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +13.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +3.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.1
Raw total +4.7
Avg player in 25.1m -10.0
Impact -5.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jevon Carter 22.1m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.0

A catastrophic perimeter shooting performance completely destroyed his offensive value and tanked his overall impact (-10.0). Although he brought his trademark defensive intensity (+3.1) and peskiness on the ball, it wasn't nearly enough to salvage the damage done by his bricked deep looks. The opposition essentially ignored him on offense, wrecking the team's half-court spacing.

Shooting
FG 0/6 (0.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -22.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Offense -6.3
Hustle +2.1
Defense +3.1
Raw total -1.1
Avg player in 22.1m -8.9
Impact -10.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Jamal Cain 19.7m
12
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.2

Flawless shot selection and suffocating defense (+8.3) resulted in an astronomical +17.2 impact rating in limited minutes. He capitalized on every single offensive touch while wreaking havoc in the passing lanes to ignite transition breaks. This was the definition of a sparkplug performance, maximizing efficiency across every possible metric.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +12.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Offense +12.0
Hustle +4.8
Defense +8.3
Raw total +25.1
Avg player in 19.7m -7.9
Impact +17.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Jett Howard 14.3m
12
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.9

Capitalized on a hot shooting hand to generate a highly positive offensive impact during his short stint. He found soft spots in the defense and knocked down his perimeter looks with confidence, punishing late closeouts. While his defensive metrics dipped slightly into the red, his scoring burst provided a much-needed lift for the bench.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -40.6
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Offense +9.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.6
Raw total +9.7
Avg player in 14.3m -5.8
Impact +3.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Goga Bitadze 14.0m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.7

A complete lack of offensive involvement allowed his overall impact to slip into negative territory (-2.7). While he provided marginal rim protection and adequate hustle, his inability to command attention in the pick-and-roll bogged down the second unit's spacing. He essentially operated as an offensive non-factor during his rotational minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 12.1%
Net Rtg -2.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.0m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +1.1
Defense +0.6
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 14.0m -5.7
Impact -2.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.8

Made the absolute most of a brief four-minute cameo by converting his interior touches and holding his ground defensively (+1.9). He brought immediate physicality to the paint, executing his role perfectly without forcing the issue. His flawless efficiency ensured a solid positive impact despite the microscopic sample size.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -18.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Offense +2.5
Hustle 0.0
Defense +1.9
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 4.0m -1.6
Impact +2.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Devin Booker 36.1m
34
pts
3
reb
7
ast
Impact
+18.7

Absolute dominance across the board resulted in a massive +18.7 total impact, driven by elite scoring efficiency and relentless activity. He paired his primary scoring duties with exceptional hustle (+9.0), constantly winning 50/50 balls and extending possessions. This was a masterclass in anchoring an offense while maintaining high-level engagement on the margins.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 16/19 (84.2%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 31.1%
Net Rtg -18.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Offense +21.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +2.4
Raw total +33.1
Avg player in 36.1m -14.4
Impact +18.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
11
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.9

A noticeable scoring surge compared to his recent slump helped him post a slight positive overall impact. He fortified his solid offensive execution with disciplined point-of-attack defense (+3.6), keeping opposing guards out of the paint. Taking advantage of his minutes, he provided a stabilizing two-way presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.2%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg +10.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.6
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 27.4m -11.0
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Oso Ighodaro 24.5m
5
pts
10
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.8

Extremely low-usage but highly efficient playstyle allowed him to maintain a positive overall impact. He generated significant value through high-motor hustle plays (+4.2) and steady defensive rotations rather than forcing his own offense. His disciplined shot selection kept the offense flowing smoothly without wasting possessions.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg -12.1
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Offense +5.3
Hustle +4.2
Defense +2.2
Raw total +11.7
Avg player in 24.5m -9.9
Impact +1.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 21.8m
9
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.5

A high volume of forced, inefficient attempts inside the arc severely damaged his overall net impact. While he managed to scrape together minor positive contributions in hustle and base box metrics, his erratic shot selection derailed offensive possessions. The persistent clanking on contested mid-range looks completely offset any marginal defensive value he provided.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 34.6%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg -6.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Offense +1.7
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.2
Raw total +3.2
Avg player in 21.8m -8.7
Impact -5.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Green 19.7m
8
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.8

Perimeter struggles completely tanked his offensive value, with a barrage of missed threes dragging his overall impact into the red. Despite the severe scoring drop-off, he stayed highly engaged off the ball, providing excellent defensive resistance (+3.9) and active hustle (+3.8) to stem the bleeding. His inability to find a shooting rhythm defined a highly frustrating outing.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 28.8%
Net Rtg -0.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Offense -3.5
Hustle +3.8
Defense +3.9
Raw total +4.2
Avg player in 19.7m -8.0
Impact -3.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
10
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.3

A disastrous shooting night from beyond the arc completely torpedoed his overall impact (-15.3). Compounding the offensive inefficiency were significant defensive lapses (-2.5) that allowed opponents to capitalize on his side of the floor. Continuing to fire away despite being ice cold turned a bad shooting slump into a major lineup liability.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -7.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense -2.5
Raw total -2.3
Avg player in 32.2m -13.0
Impact -15.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
14
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.2

Lethal perimeter execution fueled a highly productive shift, heavily boosting his box impact. He paired the spacing he provided with excellent defensive rotations (+4.1), effectively shutting down driving lanes. His ability to hit timely spot-up looks while anchoring the wing defense defined his stellar two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -4.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Offense +11.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.1
Raw total +16.5
Avg player in 30.7m -12.3
Impact +4.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
9
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.6

Elite defensive tenacity (+7.8) and off-the-charts hustle (+7.4) completely masked a rough shooting night inside the arc. He generated massive value by blowing up screens, securing loose balls, and disrupting passing lanes. This performance was a textbook example of a player impacting winning entirely through grit and physical perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.1%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -1.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Offense +3.0
Hustle +7.4
Defense +7.8
Raw total +18.2
Avg player in 29.0m -11.6
Impact +6.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

An uptick in scoring volume was dragged into the negative by poor perimeter efficiency and defensive bleeding (-0.8). While he found success attacking the interior, his insistence on taking contested deep looks stalled offensive momentum. Ultimately, the defensive breakdowns and missed jumpers slightly outweighed his aggressive scoring bursts.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.1%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +16.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Offense +4.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.8
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 15.8m -6.4
Impact -0.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.2

Made an immediate defensive mark (+2.9) despite seeing less than three minutes of floor time. His sheer size and rim-protection instincts completely altered opponent shot trajectories during his brief stint. He managed to generate a noticeably positive total impact purely through defensive deterrence without taking a single shot.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -80.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Offense 0.0
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.9
Raw total +3.3
Avg player in 2.7m -1.1
Impact +2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0