Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
PHX lead OKC lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 178 attempts

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Mitchell Hard 5/20 -7.0
Gilgeous-Alexander 15/18 +14.2
Caruso Hard 5/9 +3.9
Dort Hard 3/8 +1.7
Williams Hard 3/8 +0.4
McCain Hard 3/8 -1.4
Wallace Hard 2/8 -1.8
Holmgren 5/6 +3.7
Hartenstein Open 3/4 +1.4
Wiggins Hard 1/1 +1.1

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Brooks Hard 11/21 +5.9
Green Hard 8/19 +1.6
Booker Hard 6/16 -2.0
Gillespie Hard 3/9 -1.6
Ighodaro 6/8 +4.0
Allen Hard 2/8 -1.9
O'Neale Hard 1/4 -0.8
Maluach Hard 1/2 +0.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
OKC
PHX
45/91 Field Goals 38/87
49.5% Field Goal % 43.7%
12/37 3-Pointers 13/41
32.4% 3-Point % 31.7%
19/21 Free Throws 20/23
90.5% Free Throw % 87.0%
60.4% True Shooting % 56.1%
52 Total Rebounds 49
8 Offensive 9
35 Defensive 30
23 Assists 25
2.88 Assist/TO Ratio 2.27
7 Turnovers 11
6 Steals 2
6 Blocks 2
22 Fouls 25
50 Points in Paint 30
7 Fast Break Pts 7
11 Points off TOs 14
17 Second Chance Pts 11
36 Bench Points 12
16 Largest Lead 9
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
42 PTS · 4 REB · 8 AST · 37.9 MIN
+38.08
2
Dillon Brooks
33 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 36.8 MIN
+20.6
3
Jalen Green
26 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 38.9 MIN
+19.19
4
Alex Caruso
13 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 22.4 MIN
+13.06
5
Chet Holmgren
10 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 29.3 MIN
+12.58
6
Collin Gillespie
7 PTS · 10 REB · 5 AST · 32.5 MIN
+11.28
7
Devin Booker
16 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 39.3 MIN
+9.24
8
Oso Ighodaro
15 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 39.3 MIN
+8.58
9
Cason Wallace
6 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 26.0 MIN
+7.74
10
Luguentz Dort
9 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 23.4 MIN
+7.7
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 A. Coffey bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (1 TO) 121–109
Q4 0:18 K. Maluach REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 121–109
Q4 0:21 MISS K. Williams 25' 3PT 121–109
Q4 0:42 K. Maluach cutting DUNK (2 PTS) (R. Dunn 1 AST) 121–109
Q4 0:51 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 2 of 2 (42 PTS) 121–107
Q4 0:51 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 1 of 2 (41 PTS) 120–107
Q4 0:51 C. Gillespie personal FOUL (3 PF) (Gilgeous-Alexander 2 FT) 119–107
Q4 1:02 D. Brooks 26' 3PT step back (33 PTS) 119–107
Q4 1:10 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 2 of 2 (40 PTS) 119–104
Q4 1:10 S. Gilgeous-Alexander Free Throw 1 of 2 (39 PTS) 118–104
Q4 1:10 D. Brooks personal FOUL (5 PF) (Gilgeous-Alexander 2 FT) 117–104
Q4 1:17 J. Green cutting Layup (26 PTS) (O. Ighodaro 4 AST) 117–104
Q4 1:25 C. Holmgren cutting DUNK (10 PTS) (S. Gilgeous-Alexander 8 AST) 117–102
Q4 1:32 L. Dort REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 115–102
Q4 1:34 MISS C. Gillespie 15' pullup Shot 115–102

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Oso Ighodaro 39.3m
15
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.4

Ighodaro doubled his season scoring average through ruthlessly efficient interior finishing (6-of-8 FG), driving a strong +12.6 Offense credit. While he was highly active as a screener (4 screen assists) and rim protector (8 contests), his individual matchup defense suffered as opponents shot 60% against him.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.8%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +0.4
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.3m
Scoring +12.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense -2.0
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Devin Booker 39.3m
16
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.6

Booker struggled to find his scoring rhythm, managing just 16 points on a sluggish 6-of-16 from the floor. He pivoted to a playmaking role to salvage his +11.6 Offense credit (7 assists), but his defensive execution was lacking, allowing his assignments to shoot a blistering 64%.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.4%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg -12.6
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.3m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jalen Green 38.9m
26
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.6

Green shouldered a massive offensive burden, generating a +18.6 Offense credit by pairing 26 points with elevated playmaking (6 assists, avg 3.3). While he needed 19 shots to get there, his aggressive downhill attacks (7-of-8 from the stripe) and careful ball security (just 1 turnover) kept the offense humming.

Shooting
FG 8/19 (42.1%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 57.7%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg +7.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +17.9
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Dillon Brooks 36.8m
33
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+21.3

Brooks erupted for a massive scoring night, pouring in 33 points on 52% shooting to drive a stellar +25.6 Offense credit. He coupled this blistering offensive output with his trademark physicality, contesting 6 shots and grabbing 7 boards, even as his defensive metrics (-1.5 Defense credit) lagged slightly behind his scoring heroics.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg -1.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.8m
Scoring +26.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +7.5
Hustle +5.0
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 42.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
7
pts
10
reb
5
ast
Impact
+10.1

Gillespie's perimeter stroke betrayed him (1-of-5 from deep), but he completely redefined his value by crashing the glass for an uncharacteristic 10 rebounds. His activity level was off the charts with 4 deflections (+4.2 Hustle credit), though he was relentlessly targeted on defense, yielding a disastrous 10-of-13 shooting to his matchups.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.9%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 76.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

O'Neale was a complete non-factor offensively, scoring just 3 points on 25% shooting to drag down his side of the floor (-1.6 Offense credit). He managed to salvage some utility through sturdy perimeter defense, holding his assignments to a suffocating 2-of-7 shooting clip while grabbing 6 rebounds.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -26.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.9

Allen endured a miserable shooting night, missing six of his eight three-point attempts to finish well below his season scoring average. His struggles extended to the defensive end (-0.7 Defense credit), where opponents comfortably shot 64% against him despite his 4 contests.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.4%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg -43.3
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 63.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Maluach played a highly marginalized role in his 7 minutes, attempting just two shots and grabbing a pair of rebounds. He offered a brief flash of rim deterrence by holding his matchup to 1-of-3 shooting, but ultimately failed to leave a lasting imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -46.2
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.7m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.7

Highsmith was entirely invisible on the offensive end, failing to attempt a single shot while committing a turnover (-1.9 Offense credit). He provided a modicum of value through his defensive energy, logging 3 contests and limiting his matchup to 1-of-3 shooting in his brief 4-minute stint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Bouyea was limited to less than a minute of garbage-time action. He recorded absolutely no counting stats or hustle metrics, rendering his court time completely empty.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Ryan Dunn 0.8m
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.4

Dunn saw less than a minute of floor time, managing to dish out a single assist before the final buzzer. With zero shot attempts or defensive stats, his brief cameo yielded a negligible +0.5 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Fleming was deployed for under a minute of mop-up duty at the end of the game. He failed to register a single statistic across any category, resulting in a completely neutral impact profile.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

Coffey's fleeting one-minute appearance was actively harmful, as he managed to commit a turnover without attempting a shot or grabbing a rebound. This singular mistake drove his -1.9 Offense credit during an otherwise empty shift.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
42
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+35.3

Gilgeous-Alexander delivered an absolute masterclass in offensive efficiency, torching the defense for 42 points on a staggering 15-of-18 from the floor. His masterful orchestration generated a massive +40.8 Offense credit, while his active hands held opponents to just 38% shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 15/18 (83.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 11/12 (91.7%)
Advanced
TS% 90.2%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +10.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +39.3
Creation +4.8
Shot Making +8.1
Hustle +2.2
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Ajay Mitchell 32.5m
15
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.3

Mitchell's night was defined by extreme offensive volume paired with brutal inefficiency, needing 20 shots to score his 15 points (25% FG). Despite the erratic shot selection, he salvaged his floor time with suffocating point-of-attack defense, limiting his primary matchups to a stifling 3-of-13 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 5/20 (25.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.5%
USG% 29.1%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Chet Holmgren 29.3m
10
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.8

Holmgren sacrificed scoring volume (10 points, well below his 16.3 average) but maintained ruthless efficiency by converting 5-of-6 from the floor for a +10.1 Offense credit. While he contested 8 shots to anchor the paint, his individual matchup defense leaked value as opponents shot a blistering 64% against him.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg -12.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +9.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Luguentz Dort 23.4m
9
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.3

Dort's offensive execution drove his positive value, as he generated a +9.3 Offense credit while hitting 3-of-7 from deep. He supplemented his scoring with elevated rebounding (6 boards, avg 2.4) and steady perimeter defense, holding his primary matchup to 44% shooting.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -12.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +4.7
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.2

Hartenstein flipped his usual profile, sacrificing his typical dominance on the glass (just 3 rebounds vs his 9.4 average) to provide highly efficient interior scoring (+6.6 Offense credit). He remained a sturdy interior presence, holding his assignments to 4-of-9 shooting while chipping in 4 contests.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.0

Wallace completely abandoned his offensive rhythm (2-of-8 shooting) but compensated by transforming into an absolute menace in the passing lanes. His staggering 7 deflections drove elite defensive value (+6.2 Defense credit, +6.0 Hustle credit), proving he can tilt a game entirely through relentless ball pressure.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +20.8
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
Alex Caruso 22.4m
13
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.3

Caruso provided the ultimate two-way spark, draining 3-of-6 from deep to fuel a +9.7 Offense credit while doubling his usual scoring output. He was equally disruptive on the other end, logging 6 contests and stifling his defensive assignments to a mere 3-of-9 shooting clip (+5.0 Defense credit).

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +30.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +5.4
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
8
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

Williams stretched the floor with moderate success, hitting 2-of-6 from deep to slightly exceed his season scoring average. He provided a sturdy interior presence with 6 contests and 6 rebounds, though opponents still managed a respectable 47% shooting against him when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +35.6
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Jared McCain 12.2m
7
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

McCain struggled to find his perimeter stroke (0-for-2 from deep) but managed to chip in on the glass with 4 rebounds in limited action. His +4.9 Offense credit indicates he kept the ball moving safely, avoiding turnovers entirely while playing adequate positional defense.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.5%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -13.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +4.1
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.5

Wiggins played a highly marginalized role in his 11 minutes, attempting just a single shot and grabbing one rebound. With zero hustle stats recorded and minimal defensive engagement, his impact was largely invisible outside of a couple of clean passes that contributed to his +3.0 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Topić was relegated to brief garbage-time duty, logging less than a minute of floor time. He recorded zero counting stats or hustle metrics across the board, making it impossible to evaluate his performance beyond his mere presence on the court.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.6

Williams saw less than a minute of action, failing to make an impact outside of a single missed three-pointer. The fleeting cameo yielded a minor -0.9 Offense credit, reflecting a completely empty shift at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0