January 14, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
PHX
2P —
3P —
MIA
2P —
3P —
PHX
MIA
PHX
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Miami Heat
A heavy diet of contested jumpers and missed threes severely damaged his overall efficiency. The scoring volume was a mirage that hid how many empty possessions he created by forcing shots early in the clock. His negative impact highlights the cost of poor shot selection against a set half-court defense.
High-level shot-making from the perimeter drove a strong positive impact. He consistently punished closeouts and generated his own offense during crucial stretches when the primary actions broke down. The scoring burst was highly efficient, maximizing his usage without bleeding value on the other end.
An absolute masterclass in two-way dominance fueled a massive positive impact score. Hitting from beyond the arc completely broke the opposing defensive scheme, while his switchability suffocated ball handlers on the other end (+7.7 Def). He dictated the terms of engagement on nearly every possession he played.
Elite defensive metrics (+8.6 Def) were entirely undone by an abysmal shooting performance. Clanking all of his attempts from deep cratered his offensive value and allowed defenders to sag into the paint. His struggles to convert open looks ultimately outweighed his excellent work shutting down the point of attack.
Efficient table-setting and opportunistic scoring defined a highly productive bench stint. He kept the offense humming by taking what the defense gave him rather than forcing the issue. Strong hustle plays and mistake-free basketball ensured his minutes were a net positive.
Overcame a broken jumper from beyond the arc by attacking the basket and keeping the ball moving. His connective passing and ability to score in the intermediate areas stabilized the second unit's offense. The positive impact reflects a gritty performance where he found ways to contribute despite poor spacing.
Extreme offensive passivity torpedoed his value, as he barely looked at the rim during his extended run. After a string of highly efficient scoring games, his refusal to attack allowed his defender to freely roam and double-team others. The severe negative score illustrates the danger of being a complete non-threat on the floor.
Maximized his limited run by stretching the floor as a big man and protecting the rim (+3.3 Def). Hitting trail threes forced the opposing center out of the paint, completely opening up the driving lanes for his guards. His highly efficient two-way play provided a massive jolt to the second unit.
Barely registered a pulse offensively during his short time on the court. Despite converting his only look, his inability to generate advantages or pressure the defense led to a negative stint. He was essentially a placeholder who failed to tilt the floor in his team's favor.
A brief, disastrous stint where he failed to attempt a field goal and bled value rapidly. His inability to get involved offensively led to stagnant possessions and a quick hook from the coaching staff. The steep negative impact in just six minutes highlights a complete lack of rhythm.
Phoenix Suns
A brutal shooting night from the field tanked his net impact despite strong playmaking reads. The offense bogged down during his isolation-heavy stretches, resulting in empty trips that fueled opponent transition runs. Missing the vast majority of his attempts completely neutralized the value of his offensive creation.
A relentless diet of low-quality perimeter jumpers tanked his overall efficiency and stalled the half-court offense. The negative total impact stems from empty possessions that consistently bailed out the opposing defense. His aggressive but misguided shot selection ultimately hurt the team despite the high scoring output.
Brick-heavy perimeter shooting dragged down his overall value significantly. While he provided some resistance on the wing (+3.1 Def), clanking open spot-up looks created too many long rebounds and transition opportunities for the opponent. The severe negative impact reflects a floor spacer who completely lost his rhythm and compromised the offense.
Dominated the interior with highly efficient finishing and strong rim protection (+5.5 Def). His massive positive impact was driven by converting high-percentage looks in the pick-and-roll and anchoring the paint defensively. He consistently punished switches and controlled the restricted area to generate extra possessions.
Provided a massive spark off the bench by hitting timely perimeter shots and playing disruptive point-of-attack defense (+6.1 Def). His positive impact was fueled by capitalizing on catch-and-shoot opportunities when the defense collapsed into the paint. Bouncing back from a shooting slump, he maximized his touches without forcing the issue.
Relentless perimeter volume stretched the defense to its breaking point and opened up driving lanes for the primary creators. His positive impact was anchored by floor-spacing gravity and surprisingly stout defensive rotations (+4.3 Def). The constant threat of his jumper forced hard closeouts that compromised the opposing scheme.
Offensive invisibility and poor finishing around the rim dragged his rating into the red. Unable to capitalize on his usual scoring opportunities, his minutes became a liability on that end of the floor. Even a decent defensive effort couldn't salvage a stint marred by disjointed offensive flow.
Failed to make a dent on either end of the floor during his rotation minutes. A negative defensive rating points to missed rotations and lost matchups on the perimeter. His lack of offensive aggression compounded the defensive lapses, resulting in a net negative stint.
A stark drop in offensive involvement limited his ability to influence the game. After a hot streak of efficient scoring, he was rendered a non-factor as a roll man. The slight negative impact reflects a passive stint where he failed to assert himself in the paint.
