POR

2025-26 Season

DONOVAN CLINGAN

Portland Trail Blazers | Center | 7-2
Donovan Clingan
11.7PPG
11.3RPG
2.1APG
26.9MPG
+11.5 Impact

Clingan produces at an elite rate for a 27-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+11.5
Scoring +9.6
Points Scored 11.7 PPG = +11.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +1.1
Assists & Self-Creation 2.1 AST/g + self-creation = +1.1
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g (live + dead blend) = -2.8
Defense -0.7
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 1.6/g = +1.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -3.5
Hustle & Effort +12.7
Rebounds 11.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +9.0
Contested Shots 11.7/g = +2.3
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 2.1/g = +0.6
Raw Impact +19.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.4
Net Impact
+11.5
87th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 66th
11.7 PPG
Efficiency 38th
57.4% TS
Playmaking 74th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 95th
11.3 RPG
Defense 78th
+8.2/g
Hustle 91th
+25.4/g
Creation 84th
+4.06/g
Shot Making 55th
+5.34/g
TO Discipline 72th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Donovan Clingan’s first 26 games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by his emergence as an absolute terror on the glass, masking his erratic offensive polish with sheer physical dominance. Look at his 11/01 vs DEN matchup, where he managed just 5 points on a dreadful 2-for-8 shooting night. Despite those offensive struggles, he ripped down 15 rebounds to generate a +11.0 Impact score, creating immense non-scoring value simply by ending opponent possessions and controlling the paint. When the rebounding dries up, however, his offensive limitations are glaring. During a 11/11 vs ORL tilt, he missed four of his five shots to score just 2 points, and his modest 9 rebounds couldn't save him from a dismal -5.8 Impact score. But when everything clicks, he is a total nightmare. He absolutely bullied the interior on 11/20 vs CHI, pairing 17 points with a monstrous 21 rebounds to post a staggering +33.1 Impact score. If he can just refine his touch around the rim, his relentless motor guarantees he will be a massive problem.

This mid-season stretch was defined by Donovan Clingan evolving into a relentless rebounding machine whose value completely transcended his scoring output. Take his performance on 01/10 vs HOU. He managed just eight points on a rough 3-for-9 shooting night, yet his ability to vacuum up 15 rebounds and distribute six assists still generated a +12.8 Impact score. He similarly masked a dismal 6-for-17 shooting effort on 01/28 vs WAS by ripping down 20 boards, securing a +18.3 Impact score through sheer brute force on the glass. When his touch around the rim actually aligned with that hustle, the results were terrifying. He completely dismantled the opposition on 02/12 vs UTA with 23 points, 18 rebounds, and seven assists, earning a staggering +38.2 Impact score. Clingan is no longer just a large body clogging the paint; he has morphed into a foundational anchor who dictates the terms of engagement.

Donovan Clingan morphed into a relentless interior anchor during the back half of the season, dominating the glass while flashing surprising shooting touch. He absolutely pulverized the frontline on 03/13 vs UTA, dropping 21 points and ripping down 15 rebounds to generate a staggering +33.2 Impact score. His massive footprint meant he remained highly effective even when his scoring touch vanished entirely. During a brutal shooting night on 04/14 vs PHX where he managed just two points on 1-of-6 shooting, Clingan still scraped out a +5.1 Impact by vacuuming up 11 rebounds and keeping the offense flowing with four assists. However, his overall value plummeted on the rare nights he lost the rebounding battle. He looked utterly disconnected on 03/31 vs LAC, finishing with a meager four points and four rebounds, which dragged him down to a -6.6 Impact score. Ultimately, this stretch revealed a big man who dictates the terms of engagement through sheer physical force.

This late-season stretch was a tale of two extremes for Donovan Clingan, opening with an absolute reign of terror in the paint before settling into a stark offensive regression. At his peak, he was an unstoppable interior force. During the Mar 20 vs MIN matchup, Clingan bullied his way to 21 points and 12 rebounds, generating a massive +32.9 impact score fueled by absolute dominance in the painted area. Even when his shooting touch vanished, his sheer size often warped the floor in his team's favor. Look at Mar 23 vs BKN, where he managed just 7 points on 3-for-10 shooting but still posted a +14.3 impact because his elite rim deterrence and dominant glass-cleaning completely suffocated the opposition. However, the back half of this stretch exposed how quickly his value plummets when the offense completely dries up. During an ugly Mar 28 vs DAL contest, a brutal finishing night around the rim tanked his rating to a -7.6 impact despite grabbing 17 rebounds, revealing the hidden costs of a clunky offensive game.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Clingan posts positive impact in 86% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Clingan consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 18 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 171.6 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 17
M. Raynaud 104.5 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 22
O. Okongwu 81.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 15
N. Jokić 80.8 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 20
S. Adams 73.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 22.2%
PPP 0.24
PTS 18
B. Lopez 71.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
W. Carter Jr. 69.1 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
O. Prosper 66.8 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 25
M. Williams 62.8 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 18
M. Diabaté 62.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 169.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 27
M. Raynaud 88.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 24
D. Green 76.4 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 17
N. Jokić 68.3 poss
FG% 59.1%
3P% 54.5%
PPP 0.48
PTS 33
S. Adams 66.8 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
M. Diabaté 65.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
O. Okongwu 64.3 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 31.2%
PPP 0.34
PTS 22
W. Carter Jr. 63.8 poss
FG% 53.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 20
L. Kornet 62.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
B. Lopez 61.3 poss
FG% 35.0%
3P% 26.7%
PPP 0.36
PTS 22

SEASON STATS

83
Games
11.7
PPG
11.3
RPG
2.1
APG
0.6
SPG
1.6
BPG
50.4
FG%
32.5
3P%
67.6
FT%
26.9
MPG

GAME LOG

83 games played