Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DAL lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
DAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 208 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Sharpe 12/32 -8.5
Avdija 10/20 +0.6
Grant 7/20 -4.2
Camara 5/13 -4.1
Clingan 6/11 +1.1
Love Hard 1/6 -3.9
Williams III Open 3/5 -0.4
Murray Hard 2/2 +3.8
Rupert Hard 0/2 -2.2
Cissoko 0/2 -2.3

DAL DAL Shot-making Δ

Washington 7/16 +1.8
Flagg 9/16 +1.7
Thompson Hard 7/16 +1.6
Russell 4/11 -1.9
Williams 5/10 -1.1
Gafford Open 6/8 +1.3
Christie Hard 4/7 +3.5
Marshall 3/6 -1.0
Cisse Open 2/3 0.0
Lively II Open 1/2 -0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
DAL
46/113 Field Goals 48/95
40.7% Field Goal % 50.5%
14/47 3-Pointers 15/34
29.8% 3-Point % 44.1%
27/32 Free Throws 27/40
84.4% Free Throw % 67.5%
52.3% True Shooting % 61.3%
67 Total Rebounds 67
22 Offensive 13
31 Defensive 34
26 Assists 33
2.17 Assist/TO Ratio 2.20
11 Turnovers 14
8 Steals 7
5 Blocks 9
32 Fouls 22
56 Points in Paint 62
7 Fast Break Pts 17
17 Points off TOs 8
32 Second Chance Pts 10
15 Bench Points 47
12 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Daniel Gafford
20 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 31.2 MIN
+24.12
2
Cooper Flagg
21 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST · 37.1 MIN
+23.01
3
Donovan Clingan
16 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 27.9 MIN
+21.57
4
Deni Avdija
29 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 39.1 MIN
+17.44
5
Shaedon Sharpe
36 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 38.5 MIN
+16.61
6
Kris Murray
6 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 32.2 MIN
+15.83
7
Brandon Williams
15 PTS · 3 REB · 6 AST · 30.7 MIN
+14.45
8
Max Christie
14 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 28.3 MIN
+13.93
9
Robert Williams III
6 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 16.6 MIN
+13.11
10
Jerami Grant
26 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 39.4 MIN
+12.84
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:04 M. Christie Free Throw 2 of 2 (14 PTS) 133–138
Q5 0:04 TEAM offensive REBOUND 133–137
Q5 0:04 MISS M. Christie Free Throw 1 of 2 133–137
Q5 0:04 S. Sharpe take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Christie 2 FT) 133–137
Q5 0:05 T. Camara tip DUNK (11 PTS) 133–137
Q5 0:05 T. Camara REBOUND (Off:4 Def:6) 131–137
Q5 0:07 MISS J. Grant 26' 3PT 131–137
Q5 0:09 N. Marshall Free Throw 2 of 2 (9 PTS) 131–137
Q5 0:09 TEAM offensive REBOUND 131–136
Q5 0:09 MISS N. Marshall Free Throw 1 of 2 131–136
Q5 0:09 K. Murray take personal FOUL (2 PF) (Marshall 2 FT) 131–136
Q5 0:10 N. Marshall REBOUND (Off:3 Def:6) 131–136
Q5 0:12 MISS C. Love 32' pullup 3PT 131–136
Q5 0:14 DAL 8-second-violation Team TURNOVER 131–136
Q5 0:22 C. Flagg REBOUND (Off:2 Def:6) 131–136

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S P.J. Washington 38.3m
21
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.6

Despite catching fire from beyond the arc and playing stout defense, a disastrous string of live-ball turnovers and offensive fouls completely tanked his net rating. He forced the issue on interior drives, leading to blocked shots and transition run-outs for the opponent. The perimeter shot-making was merely a band-aid over his sloppy ball security.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg +3.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +13.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +7.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 31.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Cooper Flagg 37.1m
21
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
+19.8

Two-way versatility shined through as he seamlessly connected the offense while suffocating his primary matchups. His length disrupted multiple passing lanes, fueling transition opportunities that he finished with authority. He consistently made the right read against secondary defensive help, driving a highly positive overall impact.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 60.6%
USG% 19.3%
Net Rtg +11.4
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Scoring +15.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +9.2
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 52.4%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Daniel Gafford 31.2m
20
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.3

Ruthless efficiency around the basket and dominant rim protection anchored a massive positive swing. He feasted on drop coverage by setting bone-crushing screens and rolling hard to the paint for uncontested lobs. His ability to clean up the offensive glass and alter shots without fouling made him the most impactful big on the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.6%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +15.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
15
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.8

Penetration and kick-out precision kept the offensive engine running smoothly during his minutes. He showed excellent grit fighting over screens, which translated to a solid defensive rating despite his size. A few forced floaters in the lane slightly capped what was otherwise a steady, net-positive performance.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 59.3%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.7m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Max Christie 28.3m
14
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+3.9

Timely perimeter shot-making and disciplined closeouts defined this highly effective role-player shift. He stayed strictly within the flow of the offense, punishing defensive lapses with quick-trigger corner threes. Lateral quickness at the point of attack prevented dribble penetration and kept the defensive shell intact.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +1.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.9

Phenomenal defensive versatility and relentless pursuit of loose balls kept his overall impact in the green. He sacrificed his body for loose balls and consistently blew up opponent pick-and-rolls with aggressive hedging. However, a complete lack of perimeter gravity allowed defenders to pack the paint, neutralizing his offensive value.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg -10.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +11.4
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
19
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.2

Constant off-ball motion and the threat of his perimeter release warped the opposing defense, opening up cutting lanes for teammates. He capitalized on defensive miscommunications to drill several back-breaking triples in transition. A few blown defensive assignments on back-door cuts kept his overall impact from climbing higher.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 59.4%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +12.1
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
12
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
-6.0

Careless ball-handling and a diet of contested, early-clock jumpers severely damaged the team's offensive rhythm. He offered absolutely zero resistance or hustle on 50/50 balls, allowing the opposition to steal extra possessions. Playmaking flashes were completely overshadowed by defensive apathy and poor shot selection.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-21.7

Foul trouble and a lack of offensive assertiveness marginalized his impact during a brief stint. While his rim-deterrence metrics remained solid, he was repeatedly pushed off his spots by stronger post players. The inability to establish deep post position or execute clean dribble hand-offs stalled the second-unit offense.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.9m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -6.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 2
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.1

A quick burst of vertical athleticism yielded immediate dividends around the basket. He altered multiple shots at the rim and secured tough contested rebounds in traffic. This highly productive cameo provided a crucial spark of energy when the frontcourt rotation needed a breather.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.9%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -23.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.9

Cardio-heavy minutes resulted in virtually no offensive involvement and a few missed defensive rotations. He struggled to navigate through off-ball traffic, leaving shooters open on the perimeter. The lack of aggression on either end rendered him a net negative during this brief appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +36.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 40.5m
11
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.5

Perimeter bricklaying cratered his offensive value, as a barrage of missed threes stalled out multiple possessions. While his defensive rotations and point-of-attack pressure remained solid, the lack of spacing he provided proved too costly. Opponents completely ignored him on the perimeter down the stretch.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.3%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -7.4
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +11.7
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Jerami Grant 39.4m
26
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.3

A heavy volume of missed two-point attempts completely undermined his scoring output. His inability to generate defensive stops or secure loose balls left his overall impact deeply in the red. He settled for contested midrange looks rather than pressuring the rim.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.3%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.4m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +5.4
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Deni Avdija 39.1m
29
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+11.8

Relentless slashing and transition pushes generated high-quality looks, though a handful of clanked perimeter shots capped his ceiling. His activity level on the glass and in passing lanes kept the offense humming. He consistently exploited mismatches on the block, bullying smaller defenders to generate clean finishes.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.8%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg -10.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +22.1
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense -5.9
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 73.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
S Shaedon Sharpe 38.5m
36
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+12.9

Extreme shot-chucking negated what could have been a monster performance, as twenty missed field goals consistently bailed out the opposing defense. He showed excellent energy on 50/50 balls to keep possessions alive, but the shot selection was wildly undisciplined. Forcing tough isolation looks in traffic ultimately flatlined his net impact.

Shooting
FG 12/32 (37.5%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 48.9%
USG% 38.8%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Scoring +20.1
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 27.9m
16
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.5

Dominant rim protection and vertical spacing fueled a massive positive swing when he was on the floor. He anchored the interior defense beautifully, deterring drives and altering shots at a high rate. The willingness to step out and hit trail threes added an unexpected layer to his offensive gravity.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.3%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -20.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +13.0
Defense -4.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
Kris Murray 32.2m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.8

Elite defensive positioning and relentless hustle plays defined this incredibly efficient low-usage shift. He never forced the issue offensively, taking only wide-open catch-and-shoot looks while focusing his energy on shutting down his matchup. Flawless execution of the defensive scheme drove a highly positive net rating.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 2.1%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.2

Elite rim deterrence and quick defensive rotations completely stifled the opponent's interior attack during his stint. He provided excellent value as a lob threat, punishing late closeouts with decisive finishes. His presence alone forced multiple kick-outs from drivers who refused to challenge him at the summit.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 10.6%
Net Rtg +17.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
Caleb Love 14.2m
2
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Poor shot selection and a string of forced perimeter misses derailed the offense while he was on the floor. Although he competed adequately on the defensive end, his inability to convert open catch-and-shoot opportunities crippled the team's spacing. He repeatedly stalled ball movement by jacking up contested looks early in the shot clock.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Sidy Cissoko 11.7m
1
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.0

Frenetic energy yielded several extra possessions, but a complete lack of offensive polish rendered him a liability. He struggled to stay in front of quicker guards, leading to defensive breakdowns that erased his hustle contributions. Opposing units actively sagged off him to clog the paint.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.4%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring -1.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.6

A brief, ineffective cameo was marred by blown assignments and rushed offensive decisions. He failed to register any meaningful hustle stats and looked lost navigating through off-ball screens. The game moved too fast for him during this short stint.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +62.9
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0