POR

2025-26 Season

SCOOT HENDERSON

Portland Trail Blazers | Guard | 6-3
Scoot Henderson
14.0 PPG
2.7 RPG
3.8 APG
23.7 MPG
-2.2 Impact

Henderson produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.2
Scoring +8.0
Points 14.0 PPG × +1.00 = +14.0
Missed 2PT 3.1/g × -0.78 = -2.4
Missed 3PT 3.4/g × -0.87 = -3.0
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +2.8
Assists 3.8/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9
Turnovers -4.9
Turnovers 2.5/g × -1.95 = -4.9
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.0/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.6
Contested Shots 2.0/g × +0.20 = +0.4
Deflections 2.3/g × +0.65 = +1.5
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.2/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.6
Raw Impact +9.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
-2.2
33th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 73th
14.0 PPG
Efficiency 56th
55.6% TS
Playmaking 70th
3.8 APG
Rebounding 47th
2.7 RPG
Rim Protection 14th
0.08/min
Hustle 63th
0.11/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 5th
0.11/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening cocktail of reckless shot selection and defensive inconsistency defined Scoot Henderson’s turbulent early-season stretch. Even when the ball found the bottom of the net, hidden costs dragged him down, like during the 02/24 vs MIN matchup where his 19 points were entirely offset by errant jumpers and a distinct lack of defensive resistance, resulting in a -5.4 impact score. He routinely cratered his own offensive value by forcing drives into heavy traffic, hitting a brutal low of a -14.4 impact score on 03/04 vs MEM while shooting a frigid 3-of-11 from the floor. Yet, just when you want to write him off, Henderson flips the script and plays like an absolute wrecking ball. His performance on 03/08 vs IND was a genuine offensive masterclass. By attacking downhill relentlessly and finishing at the rim instead of settling for bad threes, he racked up 28 points and a towering +19.8 impact score. If he can simply stop bailing out defenses with low-percentage perimeter heaves, that explosive rim pressure could finally translate into consistent winning basketball.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Henderson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 42% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Henderson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -4.3, second-half: -0.2. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 51 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Dosunmu 41.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
V. Edgecombe 31.4 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Small 28.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
B. Hyland 28.3 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 12
T. Etienne 24.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Murray 24.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
B. Sheppard 24.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 9
Q. Jackson 23.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 12
B. Brown 23.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 21.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Dosunmu 44.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
V. Edgecombe 38.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
B. Hyland 32.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
J. Small 27.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
C. Braun 26.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
B. Brown 23.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
T. Murphy III 21.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 5
Q. Jackson 20.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
T. Etienne 20.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 9
I. Collier 19.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

26
Games
14.0
PPG
2.7
RPG
3.8
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
41.7
FG%
34.8
3P%
83.5
FT%
23.7
MPG

GAME LOG

26 games played