March 10, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
CHA
2P —
3P —
POR
2P —
3P —
CHA
POR
CHA
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Portland Trail Blazers
Chucking from beyond the arc completely derailed his offensive value, as a barrage of missed threes fueled opponent transition opportunities. He fought hard on the defensive end (+3.9) and generated decent hustle metrics, but his poor shot selection was too much to overcome.
Surgical precision from the field generated a massive box score impact, as he consistently punished mismatches. Timely hustle plays (+4.2) and engaged on-ball defense ensured his scoring efficiency translated directly into winning basketball.
Aggressive downhill drives defined his offensive impact, constantly putting pressure on the rim. His willingness to do the dirty work (+3.5 hustle) and steady defensive positioning kept his overall net score firmly in the green.
An uncharacteristically passive offensive showing and poor shot quality drastically reduced his overall effectiveness. While he still provided his trademark hustle (+4.3) and steady point-of-attack defense, the lack of scoring punch left a glaring hole in the lineup.
Imposing interior defense (+7.9) and relentless activity on the glass anchored his highly positive performance. Even though he struggled to finish through contact offensively, his ability to control the paint dictated the flow of the game.
Elite rim deterrence (+6.9 defense) was the defining feature of his stint, forcing opponents to alter their shot profiles. He maintained his streak of efficient finishing when targeted, serving as a reliable two-way anchor.
Hot perimeter shooting provided a massive offensive lift in a condensed role, punishing defenders who went under screens. However, defensive lapses (-0.6) and a failure to contain dribble penetration ultimately washed out his scoring contributions.
Empty offensive possessions and a failure to convert open looks quickly tanked his value during his brief stint. He offered minor defensive resistance (+0.9), but his inability to impact the game offensively made him a liability.
A quiet shift where he failed to make a significant imprint on either end of the floor, largely floating on the perimeter. Despite hitting his only look from deep, passive play and minimal defensive resistance led to a negative net rating.
Disruptive off-ball defense (+2.6) was his primary contribution during a brief rotation stint. An inability to generate any offensive gravity allowed defenders to sag off, resulting in a slightly negative overall impact.
Charlotte Hornets
Stifling perimeter defense (+11.0) was the cornerstone of his highly impactful performance. While his shot selection was occasionally forced, his two-way energy and crucial hustle plays more than compensated for the clanked jumpers.
Impact was buoyed by confident perimeter shot selection that stretched the opposing defense. Active hands in the passing lanes (+5.2 defensive rating) and a willingness to fight for loose balls (+6.2 hustle) proved his value extends far beyond spot-up duties.
A brutal diet of forced jumpers and missed finishes at the rim completely tanked his offensive value. He managed to salvage some utility through relentless energy plays (+6.1 hustle) and engaged defensive rotations, but the sheer volume of wasted possessions dictated his negative score.
Elite interior anchoring (+9.2 defense) defined his time on the floor, effectively neutralizing opponents in the paint. Even with his streak of highly efficient shooting coming to an end, his ability to generate extra possessions through hustle (+3.5) resulted in a massive net positive.
A lethargic defensive effort (-1.3) and a complete absence of hustle plays defined a highly damaging performance. Inefficient volume scoring further dragged down his net impact, as he gave back too much on the other end of the floor.
Excellent shot selection and timely perimeter makes provided a surprising offensive spark. His disciplined defensive rotations (+3.5) ensured that his scoring burst translated into a positive overall impact.
Tremendous energy plays (+6.7 hustle) kept him relevant despite being largely invisible as a scoring threat. However, his hesitance to attack closeouts and overall lack of offensive gravity ultimately resulted in a slightly negative net rating.
Flawless finishing around the basket drove a massive offensive spike, perfectly complementing his elite rim protection (+9.9 defense). Dominating his matchup in the paint allowed him to post a team-high impact score in limited minutes.
Poor shot quality and an inability to convert open looks cratered his offensive impact. He provided sturdy post defense (+5.5) to stop the bleeding, but a complete lack of hustle stats left his overall contribution firmly in the red.
Maximized a brief stint on the floor by executing defensive assignments perfectly (+3.8). Hitting his only perimeter look provided just enough spacing to yield a highly efficient net positive in under six minutes of action.
