POR

2025-26 Season

MATISSE THYBULLE

Portland Trail Blazers | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Matisse Thybulle
5.7 PPG
2.1 RPG
0.9 APG
15.3 MPG
+2.7 Impact

Thybulle produces at an above average rate for a 15-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.5/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.7
Scoring +3.5
Points 5.7 PPG × +1.00 = +5.7
Missed 2PT 0.6/g × -0.78 = -0.5
Missed 3PT 1.8/g × -0.87 = -1.6
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.1
Assists 0.9/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 0.5/g × +1.26 = +0.6
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +3.5
Steals 1.9/g × +2.30 = +4.4
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 1.6/g × +0.30 = +0.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.0
Contested Shots 1.5/g × +0.20 = +0.3
Deflections 3.6/g × +0.65 = +2.3
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.6
Net Impact
+2.7
91st pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 19th
5.8 PPG
Efficiency 65th
56.7% TS
Playmaking 7th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 27th
2.2 RPG
Rim Protection 100th
0.29/min
Hustle 99th
0.20/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 45th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Matisse Thybulle’s early season was defined by extreme stylistic whiplash, alternating between game-wrecking defensive chaos and total offensive invisibility. When his jumper occasionally fell, he was a terrifying two-way weapon. He logged a staggering +13.3 impact score on 10/24 vs GSW by hitting all three of his shots and blowing up passing lanes for a +14.0 defensive mark. Even when barely looking at the rim, his relentless hustle generated massive value, like during 03/06 vs HOU where he scored just five points but posted a +10.0 impact by turning pure defensive disruption into easy transition opportunities. Yet, that same hyper-specialization often became a fatal flaw when his shot completely abandoned him. On 03/04 vs MEM, his offensive zero-act resulted in a brutal -7.8 impact score. Because he went scoreless on 0-of-3 shooting, defenders aggressively cheated off him to clog the driving lanes for his teammates. He remains a brilliant schematic disruptor off the bench, but his on-court survival entirely depends on opponents respecting him just enough on the perimeter.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Steady role player. Thybulle's impact doesn't swing much in absolute terms, and he's positive in 65% of games. You know what you're getting.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 33% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Thybulle consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +4.1, second-half: +1.3. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Hyland 19.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
T. Murphy III 18.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. Johnson 16.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Garland 14.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Randle 13.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3
K. Leonard 12.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 3
A. Gordon 11.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. McConnell 11.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Miller 11.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
T. Prince 11.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Garland 18.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
Z. Williams 16.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 6
J. Fears 15.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1
T. Murphy III 15.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Hyland 13.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 5
J. Murray 10.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 5
J. Randle 10.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 5
T. Prince 9.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Braun 9.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
T. Hardaway Jr. 9.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

26
Games
5.7
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.9
APG
1.9
SPG
0.5
BPG
43.4
FG%
39.2
3P%
87.0
FT%
15.3
MPG

GAME LOG

26 games played