LAL

2025-26 Season

DEANDRE AYTON

Los Angeles Lakers | Center | 7-0
Deandre Ayton
12.4 PPG
8.2 RPG
0.8 APG
27.3 MPG
+4.8 Impact

Ayton produces at an above average rate for a 27-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.8
Scoring +9.6
Points 12.4 PPG × +1.00 = +12.4
Missed 2PT 2.7/g × -0.78 = -2.1
Missed 3PT 0.0/g × -0.87 = -0.0
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +2.9
Assists 0.8/g × +0.50 = +0.4
Off. Rebounds 2.0/g × +1.26 = +2.5
Turnovers -2.3
Turnovers 1.2/g × -1.95 = -2.3
Defense +2.1
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 6.1/g × +0.30 = +1.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.7
Contested Shots 7.9/g × +0.20 = +1.6
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 3.8/g × +0.30 = +1.1
Raw Impact +16.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.2
Net Impact
+4.8
70th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 73th
12.5 PPG
Efficiency 86th
67.3% TS
Playmaking 18th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 74th
8.3 RPG
Rim Protection 46th
0.18/min
Hustle 23th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 65th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A staggering hot streak of hyper-efficient interior finishing and sheer physical imposition defined Deandre Ayton’s first twenty games of the season. He completely dictated the flow of the game on 11/03 vs POR, logging 29 points and 10 rebounds to generate a massive +19.4 impact score. That towering number stemmed directly from his flawless shot selection and an ability to convert highly efficient looks around the rim. Even when his scoring volume vanished, he found ways to contribute. He scored just 9 points on 10/31 vs MEM but still managed a +0.8 impact score because his disciplined interior finishing kept the baseline offense afloat despite grabbing zero rebounds. Yet, his passivity occasionally returned to haunt him. He posted a -3.9 impact score on 12/25 vs HOU despite shooting a near-perfect 5-for-6 from the floor for 10 points. Soft pick-and-roll coverages and a glaring inability to secure contested defensive rebounds dragged down his overall rating in that matchup, revealing the hidden defensive costs of his occasional lack of motor.

A wildly oscillating pendulum of interior dominance and maddening passivity defined this stretch of the season for Deandre Ayton. When he actually decided to seal his man and attack with intent, he was downright unstoppable. Look at his staggering +17.5 impact score on 01/18 vs TOR, where he shot a flawless 10-for-10 from the floor by relying on absolute perfection around the rim rather than settling for soft jumpers. Yet, his habit of drifting away from the basket still reared its ugly head. During a frustrating showing on 01/24 vs DAL, a heavy volume of forced, contested hooks cratered his offensive efficiency, resulting in a brutal 4-for-16 shooting night and a -2.5 impact score. Fortunately, he found ways to contribute even when his offensive touch abandoned him entirely. On 01/07 vs SAS, he managed only 9 points, but his disciplined defensive anchoring kept his overall impact at a positive +2.5 for the night.

A maddening tug-of-war between flawless interior efficiency and inexplicable passivity defined this mid-season stretch for Deandre Ayton. When he actually demanded the basketball, he was an absolute force. Look at his 03/12 vs CHI performance, where he bullied his way to 23 points and 10 rebounds on 10-of-13 shooting, generating a robust +8.0 impact score by punishing smaller defenders on the block. Even when his scoring volume plummeted, he could still warp the game through pure hustle and defensive discipline. On 03/16 vs HOU, he managed just 7 points but posted a stellar +8.1 impact rating because he fully embraced a gritty rim-protection role and controlled the glass with 11 boards. Yet, those aggressive flashes only made his frequent disappearing acts more frustrating. During the 03/19 vs MIA matchup, his extreme reluctance to engage in the pick-and-roll completely neutralized his offensive gravity, resulting in an abysmal -8.2 impact score despite hitting three of his five shots. He possesses the soft touch to dominate the paint every night, but his recurring refusal to impose his physical will keeps his ceiling artificially capped.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Ayton has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 86% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Ayton consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 6 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 69 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Williams 102.4 poss
FG% 81.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 34
R. Gobert 97.7 poss
FG% 78.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 22
I. Hartenstein 85.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 8
M. Raynaud 76.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
D. Queen 75.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 29
A. Sengun 64.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 12
M. Diabaté 60.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 16
N. Queta 58.6 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
L. Kornet 57.8 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 13
K. Towns 56.8 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Williams 110.0 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 25
R. Gobert 98.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 4
M. Raynaud 70.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
M. Diabaté 65.2 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 12
I. Hartenstein 61.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15
A. Sengun 61.5 poss
FG% 90.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 20
N. Queta 60.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
L. Kornet 59.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.02
PTS 1
W. Carter Jr. 58.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9
O. Okongwu 56.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

67
Games
12.4
PPG
8.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.9
BPG
67.4
FG%
0.0
3P%
63.0
FT%
27.3
MPG

GAME LOG

67 games played