POR

2025-26 Season

JERAMI GRANT

Portland Trail Blazers | Forward | 6-7
Jerami Grant
17.9PPG
3.4RPG
2.0APG
29.2MPG
+4.3 Impact

Grant produces at an above average rate for a 29-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.3
Scoring +15.5
Points Scored 17.9 PPG = +17.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -5.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.5
Creation +1.4
Assists & Self-Creation 2.0 AST/g + self-creation = +1.4
Turnovers -4.5
Turnovers 2.0/g (live + dead blend) = -4.5
Defense -0.1
Steals 0.8/g = +1.8
Blocks 0.6/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.4
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Rebounds 3.4 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.8
Contested Shots 2.8/g = +0.6
Deflections 1.2/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +15.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
+4.3
72th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 85th
17.9 PPG
Efficiency 72th
59.1% TS
Playmaking 62th
2.0 APG
Rebounding 33th
3.4 RPG
Defense 44th
+7.0/g
Hustle 42th
+11.4/g
Creation 92th
+4.68/g
Shot Making 89th
+8.87/g
TO Discipline 19th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jerami Grant's first twenty games of the 2025-26 campaign were defined by a stark mid-November role change, shifting from an overqualified bench weapon to a high-volume starter. He thrived early in a reserve capacity, erupting for 29 points on scorching 10-for-14 shooting on 10/22 vs MIN to yield a massive +18.5 Impact score driven by elite shot selection. The eventual promotion to the starting five unlocked his ceiling but also exposed his floor. When his jumper was dialed in, he looked like a star, pouring in 33 points and grabbing 9 rebounds on 11/20 vs CHI to generate a staggering +25.5 Impact score fueled by aggressive board work and hot perimeter shooting. However, the increased offensive burden occasionally led to forced looks and empty possessions. Just two nights later on 11/22 vs GSW, Grant tossed up heavily contested shots all evening, finishing with a dismal 5 points on 0-for-8 from the floor. That abysmal performance resulted in a -14.0 Impact score, as his complete lack of scoring rhythm and poor offensive decisions dragged the entire unit into the mud.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by a jarring mid-season demotion to the bench before Grant ultimately reclaimed his starting job. His erratic shot selection frequently derailed the offense early on, like when he put up 16 points during the 12/12 vs NOP contest but posted a -6.0 Impact score due to the hidden cost of a brutal 6-for-19 shooting performance. Yet, he can still salvage his nights when the jumper isn't falling by leaning into the dirty work. During the 12/04 vs CLE game, Grant labored to 16 points on 5-for-15 shooting but still managed a +1.0 Impact score because he created non-scoring value by grabbing 5 rebounds and dishing out 6 assists. Reinserted into the starting five in February, he finally found a sustainable balance. He poured in 29 points on a highly efficient 10-for-17 from the floor in the 02/07 vs MEM game. That outing generated a +12.2 Impact score, driven by his willingness to hunt high-percentage looks and punish mismatches rather than settling for contested shots.

Jerami Grant’s mid-season stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between dominant two-way force and total passenger. When engaged, he was an absolute wrecking ball. Take the 03/04 vs MEM matchup, where he poured in 30 points and grabbed 9 rebounds, generating a massive +22.5 Impact score by combining sharp shot selection with relentless effort on the glass. Yet, his focus could evaporate without warning. During the 03/13 vs UTA game, he managed just 9 points on five shot attempts, yielding a brutal -12.7 Impact because his extreme passivity starved the offense and left him floating aimlessly. Even when his scoring totals looked respectable, the underlying value often fluctuated. He dropped 20 points on 03/15 vs PHI, but produced a surprisingly mediocre +4.4 Impact because his one-dimensional perimeter gunning came with hidden costs to defensive resistance and ball movement. Relying on him night to night remains a pure gamble.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Grant has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~8 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Grant locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +5.2, second-half: +3.5. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Randle 72.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.19
PTS 14
M. Bridges 56.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.29
PTS 16
G. Jackson 56.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
A. Edwards 44.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
C. Flagg 44.2 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.48
PTS 21
R. O'Neale 43.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
C. Wallace 43.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
I. Okoro 40.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
J. Butler III 39.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
R. Hachimura 39.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Butler III 61.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 10
J. Randle 55.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
G. Jackson 51.2 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 12
M. Bridges 51.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
J. McDaniels 48.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 47.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.23
PTS 11
C. Flagg 42.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
R. Hachimura 39.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 12
S. Curry 38.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 53.8%
PPP 0.62
PTS 24
I. Okoro 38.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1

SEASON STATS

64
Games
17.9
PPG
3.4
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
SPG
0.6
BPG
45.1
FG%
39.2
3P%
81.9
FT%
29.2
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played