GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Stephon Castle 37.8m
18
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+8.9

Castle operated as a high-octane offensive engine, tallying 18 points and 5 assists, but loose execution plagued his performance. He coughed the ball up 3 times, resulting in a -7.8 Turnover penalty that limited his playmaking value (+1.8 Creation). Despite the giveaways, his aggressive rebounding (7 boards) fueled a robust +8.9 Hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/5 (40.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.5%
USG% 26.6%
Net Rtg -1.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +8.9
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Devin Vassell 33.9m
16
pts
12
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.7

Vassell ground out immense value through sheer defensive grit and rebounding, pulling down 12 boards (avg 4.5) to fuel a +6.5 Hustle credit. While his perimeter shot abandoned him (0-of-5 from deep), he compensated by generating 3 steals and anchoring a stellar +7.6 Defense mark. This gritty, two-way effort perfectly masked his inefficient 38% shooting from the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.0%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +6.5
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 33.6m
17
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.5

Fox generated solid offensive production (+9.6 Scoring) but actively sabotaged his own playmaking with careless decision-making. His 3 turnovers (avg 2.1) triggered a -7.1 penalty in the play-by-play model, undercutting his 4 assists. He did show strong engagement defensively, racking up 5 deflections and 2 steals, but the sloppy ball security defined his outing.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.7%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg -21.9
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +9.6
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
9
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.9

Champagnie was highly efficient in his limited offensive opportunities, burying 2 of his 3 attempts from beyond the arc to drive a +7.7 Scoring credit. However, his defensive execution was lacking, as reflected by a -3.2 Defense penalty in the play-by-play model. Despite the sharp shooting, his overall footprint on the game remained relatively modest.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -26.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +7.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.5

Wembanyama endured a shockingly quiet night, managing just 5 points (-83% vs his massive season average) on a mere three field goal attempts. His offensive rhythm was totally disrupted, compounded by 2 turnovers that resulted in a -5.4 penalty. Though he still offered some physical presence (+5.1 Hustle), this was a drastic departure from his usual dominant form.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.5%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -24.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Luke Kornet 27.8m
10
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.9

Kornet was an absolute monster in the dirty-work categories, driving a massive +11.4 Hustle credit through 12 contested shots and 5 screen assists. He paired this physical dominance with hyper-efficient scoring, pouring in 10 points on 4-of-5 shooting. This highly effective two-way effort showcased his immense value as an opportunistic interior anchor.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 79.1%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +20.8
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +8.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +11.4
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 23.4m
10
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.8

Harper scored efficiently (4-of-7 FG) to generate a solid +7.8 Scoring credit, but his stint was marred by poor ball security. He doubled his season average with 3 turnovers, resulting in a -6.6 penalty that erased much of his offensive value. This volatile mix of efficient finishing and sloppy decision-making perfectly encapsulated his erratic bench role.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +12.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -6.6
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
7
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.3

Johnson struggled to find his usual scoring rhythm, managing just 7 points (-52% vs average) on 3-of-7 shooting off the bench. While his offensive impact was muted, he managed to leave a mark defensively with 2 steals, driving a +2.9 Defense credit. Ultimately, a lack of volume and a -3.1 Turnover penalty kept him from being the chaotic sparkplug his team needed.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +15.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.8m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.7

Barnes drifted through his 15 minutes as a total offensive ghost, attempting just three shots and finishing with a meager 4 points. He failed to generate any meaningful rhythm, logging a low +2.5 Scoring credit while offering nothing in the peripheral categories. This passive, invisible outing highlighted his ongoing struggles to consistently impact the game off the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +49.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.7

Bryant provided a modest but efficient scoring punch off the bench, converting 3 of his 5 attempts to drive a +5.3 Scoring credit. However, his defensive execution was lacking (-1.9 Defense), and a pair of hidden costs in turnovers dragged down his overall utility. It was a classic empty-calorie performance that failed to anchor the second unit.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -38.0
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 39.0m
16
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+0.8

Holiday operated as a high-volume facilitator with 9 assists, but his decision-making was uncharacteristically sloppy. Coughing up 5 turnovers (double his 2.5 average) resulted in a -11.8 penalty in the play-by-play model, undercutting his offensive contributions. Despite solid scoring (+8.6) and a strong +6.3 Hustle credit, the giveaways kept his overall impact muted.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.7%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +11.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -11.8
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 5
S Scoot Henderson 38.0m
31
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+22.3

A blistering scoring eruption defined Henderson's night, as he poured in 31 points (+114% vs his season average) on highly efficient 65% shooting. His perimeter touch was dialed in (5-of-9 from deep), driving an elite +7.8 ShotMaking credit. Though his playmaking took a back seat with zero assists, his sheer offensive dominance (+25.7 Scoring) overwhelmed the opposition.

Shooting
FG 11/17 (64.7%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 78.9%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +25.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Toumani Camara 34.8m
10
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.2

Relentless energy and defensive disruption defined Camara's outing, driving a massive +10.5 Hustle credit. He attacked the glass for 9 rebounds (avg 3.9) and wreaked havoc in passing lanes with 4 deflections and 3 steals. While his scoring was modest (10 points), his elite defensive impact (+7.3) anchored a +17 plus-minus in his 34 minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +10.5
Defense +7.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 0
S Deni Avdija 29.8m
14
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-11.1

Avdija's offensive production plummeted well below his recent high-usage standards, managing just 14 points (avg 26.4) on 38% shooting. Careless ball security was a major detriment, as 4 turnovers fueled a -9.5 penalty in the play-by-play model. Furthermore, his defensive struggles (-6.0 component) compounded the issues on a night where he failed to dictate the game's pace.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.1%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg -1.6
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -6.0
Turnovers -9.5
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Donovan Clingan 23.9m
9
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.9

Clingan's value was entirely tethered to his interior activity, generating a +11.7 Hustle credit despite a quiet offensive night. He secured 10 rebounds and contested 8 shots, providing a reliable physical presence in the paint. However, poor finishing (4-of-12 from the field) limited his scoring impact (+2.0) and capped his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -27.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +11.7
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
11
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+14.8

Williams III was an absolute force off the bench, blending hyper-efficient finishing (5-of-6 FG) with dominant rebounding. His sheer physical presence generated a stellar +10.5 Hustle credit, as he corralled 9 boards and dished out 4 screen assists. This highly disruptive two-way effort perfectly illustrated his value as a high-yield rotational enforcer.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.4%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +28.3
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +10.5
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Jerami Grant 20.3m
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

An abysmal shooting performance rendered Grant a complete non-factor offensively, managing just 5 points on 1-of-8 from the floor. He failed to generate any rhythm, logging a negative Scoring credit (-0.3) while offering minimal resistance on the other end. This passive, inefficient outing perfectly encapsulated his frustrating tendency to drift out of games.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.8%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Sharpe provided an efficient but quiet scoring punch, notching 9 points on 3-of-5 shooting during his 12 minutes on the floor. His ability to convert looks drove a solid +7.5 Scoring credit, though he offered virtually nothing else across the box score. A lack of defensive resistance (-1.4 credit) kept him from making a more profound impact on the game.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -0.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.7m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.6

Thybulle was a complete zero on the offensive end, missing all three of his shots and finishing scoreless in 10 minutes of action. While he managed 3 deflections, his defensive presence (-1.1 credit) wasn't nearly enough to offset his offensive invisibility. The empty minutes actively stalled his team's momentum, reflected in a -22 plus-minus.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -102.1
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.3m
Scoring -2.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
1
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.7

Murray's brief 7-minute cameo was derailed by poor ball security, coughing up 3 turnovers against a season average of just 0.7. This sloppiness resulted in a -7.8 Turnover penalty, completely erasing any utility he might have offered. He was virtually invisible offensively, managing a single point on an empty 0-of-1 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.6%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +4.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.8m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3