Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 169 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Avdija 7/15 -2.6
Holiday 3/14 -9.0
Clingan 4/11 -3.0
Williams III Open 5/10 -1.3
Camara 2/10 -6.5
Cissoko 4/6 +2.7
Henderson 2/6 -1.1
Grant 2/6 -1.6
Thybulle Hard 1/6 -4.9
Sharpe Hard 2/5 +0.2

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Fox 8/14 +2.4
Castle Hard 6/11 +2.3
Vassell Hard 4/11 -2.9
Champagnie Hard 6/9 +7.8
Harper Open 6/9 +1.3
Johnson Open 3/8 -2.8
Wembanyama 5/7 +3.9
Barnes Hard 1/3 -1.1
Kornet Open 2/2 +1.2
Waters III Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
SAS
33/94 Field Goals 41/75
35.1% Field Goal % 54.7%
11/47 3-Pointers 12/30
23.4% 3-Point % 40.0%
18/23 Free Throws 20/29
78.3% Free Throw % 69.0%
45.6% True Shooting % 64.9%
52 Total Rebounds 58
14 Offensive 7
24 Defensive 35
24 Assists 27
2.67 Assist/TO Ratio 1.59
9 Turnovers 14
8 Steals 5
2 Blocks 8
28 Fouls 24
38 Points in Paint 44
12 Fast Break Pts 16
13 Points off TOs 13
21 Second Chance Pts 9
43 Bench Points 32
0 Largest Lead 28
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
17 PTS · 14 REB · 3 AST · 33.6 MIN
+17.4
2
Dylan Harper
17 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 25.6 MIN
+17.0
3
Julian Champagnie
19 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 30.0 MIN
+16.3
4
De'Aaron Fox
21 PTS · 3 REB · 9 AST · 33.9 MIN
+13.5
5
Sidy Cissoko
11 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 19.9 MIN
+13.0
6
Robert Williams III
11 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 16.9 MIN
+10.5
7
Jerami Grant
12 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 16.7 MIN
+5.8
8
Donovan Clingan
10 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 27.2 MIN
+4.7
9
Deni Avdija
22 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 31.5 MIN
+3.5
10
Toumani Camara
7 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 33.4 MIN
+3.0
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 95–114
Q4 0:18 B. Biyombo REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 95–114
Q4 0:26 MISS Yang 25' 3PT 95–114
Q4 0:36 S. Cissoko REBOUND (Off:2 Def:2) 95–114
Q4 0:38 MISS L. Waters III 27' step back 3PT 95–114
Q4 0:53 L. Waters III REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 95–114
Q4 0:56 MISS Yang 25' pullup 3PT 95–114
Q4 1:03 S. Cissoko REBOUND (Off:2 Def:1) 95–114
Q4 1:06 MISS K. Olynyk Free Throw 2 of 2 95–114
Q4 1:06 TEAM offensive REBOUND 95–114
Q4 1:06 MISS K. Olynyk Free Throw 1 of 2 95–114
Q4 1:06 K. Murray take personal FOUL (1 PF) (Olynyk 2 FT) 95–114
Q4 1:11 D. Avdija Free Throw 2 of 2 (22 PTS) 95–114
Q4 1:11 TEAM offensive REBOUND 94–114
Q4 1:11 MISS D. Avdija Free Throw 1 of 2 94–114

GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about
game swinger
Victor Wembanyama actually won the night
17 points, 14 boards, 3 assists was the line. The lift came from scoring (+15.6), hustle (+4.2), and shot-making (+2.3), pushing Net Impact to +17.4.
Scoring +15.6
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Hustle +4.2
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Shot-making +2.3
Makes above expected shot difficulty.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Jrue Holiday too hard
8 points, 6 boards, 7 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-5.4) and defense (-3.1), pulling Net Impact down to -7.4.
Turnovers -5.4
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense -3.1
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Creation +1.3
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
box score lie
The box score sold Stephon Castle too hard
15 points, 3 boards, 5 assists was already a rough line. The real damage was turnovers (-16.7) and defense (-1.0), pulling Net Impact down to -6.6.
Turnovers -16.7
Possessions destroyed by giveaways.
Defense -1.0
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Creation +1.2
Assist credit weighted by shot quality created.
Check the tape
hidden value
Sidy Cissoko's value was hiding in plain sight
11 points, 4 boards, 0 assists undersells it. scoring (+9.4), hustle (+5.1), and defense (+4.7) pushed his Net Impact to +13.0.
Scoring +9.4
Points, shot value, and miss penalties.
Hustle +5.1
Rebounding and extra-possession work.
Defense +4.7
Steals, blocks, fouls, and defensive events.
Check the tape

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 33.9m
21
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
+13.5

Fox orchestrated the offense masterfully, pouring in 21 points on highly efficient 8-of-14 shooting while dishing out 9 assists to fuel a +17.7 Offense component. He was equally stifling on the other end, holding his defensive matchups to a miserable 4-of-16 (25%) from the floor.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg +38.2
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Devin Vassell 33.8m
10
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.5

Vassell's perimeter shot completely abandoned him, as he went 0-of-4 from deep and finished with a below-average 10 points. Despite the offensive struggles (+4.3 Offense component), he stayed engaged defensively, tallying 3 deflections and a block to salvage some value.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.1%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +36.8
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
17
pts
14
reb
3
ast
Impact
+17.4

Wembanyama was an absolute terror defensively, racking up 6 blocks, 13 contests, and 7 deflections to anchor a dominant +12.5 Defense component. While his 17 points were below his lofty 26.5 average, his hyper-efficient 5-of-7 shooting and 14 rebounds ensured his two-way impact remained immense.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.2%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +27.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +15.6
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +4.2
Defense -0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 0
BLK 6
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 33.0m
15
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.6

Castle's playmaking was severely compromised by poor decision-making, as he coughed up 7 turnovers (well above his 3.4 average). While he scored efficiently (6-of-11 shooting) and defended his matchups well (33% allowed), the sheer volume of giveaways dragged his Offense component down to a meager +2.7.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.1%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg +23.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.0
Turnovers -16.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 7
19
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+16.3

Champagnie was a lethal perimeter weapon, torching the nets for 19 points on 5-of-7 shooting from beyond the arc. This scorching efficiency, combined with zero turnovers, drove a massive +17.9 Offense component and showcased his value as an elite floor spacer.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 92.1%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +16.1
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +2.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Dylan Harper 25.6m
17
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.0

Harper was an explosive two-way force off the bench, pouring in 17 points on highly efficient 6-of-9 shooting to drive a +16.4 Offense component. His defensive activity was equally impressive, as he racked up 3 steals and 4 deflections to generate a robust +7.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.5

Johnson struggled to find his offensive rhythm, managing just 7 points (below his 11.9 average) on 3-of-8 shooting. His lack of playmaking (1 assist) and couple of turnovers resulted in a nearly invisible +0.6 Offense component during his 18 minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 39.4%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +5.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Luke Kornet 13.2m
5
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.8

Kornet provided a highly efficient, low-usage spark, converting both of his field goal attempts and generating a +9.5 Offense credit through mistake-free play (0 turnovers) and 3 assists. He also anchored the interior effectively when challenged, holding opponents to just 2-of-9 (22%) shooting as the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 102.5%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +5.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Barnes was a complete non-factor offensively, missing both of his three-point attempts and finishing with just 3 points. His passive 13-minute shift yielded no assists or defensive counting stats, reflecting his inability to leave a meaningful imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +3.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.8

In a fleeting one-minute appearance, Waters III missed his lone three-point attempt and grabbed a single rebound. His brief, empty stint resulted in a slightly negative -0.9 Offense component.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

McLaughlin was entirely invisible during his one minute on the floor, failing to register a single counting stat. His fleeting appearance left no impact on the game, as shown by his +0.0 component scores.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Bryant logged just over a minute of garbage time and failed to record a single statistic. His completely empty box score resulted in flat +0.0 component credits across the board.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

Olynyk's one-minute cameo was marred by his inability to capitalize at the charity stripe, missing both of his free throw attempts. This lack of execution dragged his Offense component down to -1.6 without any redeeming peripheral stats.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

Biyombo managed to grab a single rebound during his brief one-minute shift but was otherwise uninvolved. His limited court time yielded a flat +0.0 Offense component and a negligible defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 39.5m
8
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
-7.4

An ice-cold shooting performance (3-of-14 from the floor) severely limited Holiday's offensive footprint, yielding a paltry +0.9 Offense component. While he still facilitated effectively with 7 assists, his inability to convert looks (8 points vs 18.1 average) dragged down his overall effectiveness in nearly 40 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 27.7%
USG% 16.8%
Net Rtg -30.2
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring -0.5
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +5.7
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Toumani Camara 33.4m
7
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.0

A brutal shooting night (2-of-10 overall, 1-of-7 from deep) completely derailed Camara's offensive utility, dropping him well below his 12.8 point average. His defensive impact was equally concerning, as opponents torched him for 7-of-8 (88%) shooting when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 2/10 (20.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.2%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +10.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 87.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Deni Avdija 31.5m
22
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.5

Avdija generated strong offensive value (+8.7 Offense component) despite struggling from deep (1-of-6), relying on his ability to get to the foul line (7-of-11 FT) to buoy his scoring. However, his playmaking impact was muted, as he recorded more turnovers (4) than assists (3, down from his 6.4 average).

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 7/11 (63.6%)
Advanced
TS% 55.4%
USG% 32.0%
Net Rtg -31.3
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Donovan Clingan 27.2m
10
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.7

Clingan's value was heavily anchored by his surprising playmaking and effort, dishing out an above-average 6 assists while generating a +5.8 Hustle component via 4 screen assists and 3 deflections. However, his interior presence faltered defensively, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 9-of-13 (69%) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -12.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Scoot Henderson 16.9m
5
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

Henderson was a complete non-factor in his 16 minutes, managing just 5 points (well below his 15.2 average) and failing to record a single assist. His minimal involvement and poor shooting (2-of-6) resulted in a meager +1.6 Offense component, highlighting his inability to spark the second unit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -60.2
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Sidy Cissoko 19.9m
11
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+13.0

Cissoko delivered a massive two-way spark in his 19 minutes, exploding for 11 points (well above his 2.1 average) on 4-of-6 shooting to drive a +12.1 Offense credit. His defensive activity was equally disruptive, generating 3 steals and 4 deflections to secure a +5.2 Defense component.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.4%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.5

Williams III provided a highly efficient scoring punch off the bench, tallying 11 points (above his 7.0 average) on 5-of-10 shooting to fuel a +11.5 Offense component. He paired this with his usual steady rebounding (7 boards) and mistake-free play (0 turnovers), acting as a reliable interior anchor.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.0%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -14.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jerami Grant 16.7m
12
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.8

Grant salvaged a low-volume shooting night (2-of-6) by aggressively attacking the rim, converting 7-of-8 free throws to bolster his +10.0 Offense component. He also provided a solid two-way presence, grabbing 2 steals (above his 1.0 average) and generating a +3.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 63.0%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.8

Thybulle's defensive instincts were sharp, racking up 2 steals, 1 block, and 3 deflections to drive a robust +5.8 Defense component. However, his offensive game was practically non-existent, as he bricked all five of his three-point attempts and finished with just 2 points.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -15.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.4

Krejčí struggled to make an impact during his 13 minutes on the floor, missing both of his three-point attempts to finish with just 2 points. While he chipped in 2 assists, his overall offensive contribution (+1.2 Offense component) was negligible.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -3.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.0m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.8

In a brief six-minute cameo, Sharpe managed to put up 5 points on 2-of-5 shooting, resulting in a modest +2.6 Offense component. He recorded a completely empty line otherwise, failing to register a single rebound, assist, or defensive counting stat.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 38.5%
Net Rtg -63.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.0m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.6

Murray was completely invisible during his fleeting one-minute stint, failing to record a single statistic across the board. His brief appearance yielded a flat +0.0 Offense component and a slight negative defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.8

Yang's one-minute garbage-time cameo was entirely unproductive, as he bricked both of his three-point attempts. This brief, inefficient stretch resulted in a -1.8 Offense component without any redeeming hustle or defensive stats.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 66.7%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
Scoring -1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Wesley logged just over a minute of action and failed to register a single box score or hustle statistic. His empty shift left zero imprint on the game, reflected in his flat +0.0 component scores across the board.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.2m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0