Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
POR lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
POR 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 167 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Fox 11/17 +8.0
Wembanyama 9/17 -0.4
Castle 6/14 +0.2
Vassell 5/9 +1.5
Kornet Open 1/7 -7.0
Champagnie Hard 3/6 +1.8
Harper 1/6 -5.2
Johnson Open 3/5 +0.8
Bryant Hard 2/3 +2.9
Barnes 1/2 -0.5

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Avdija Open 8/14 +1.4
Holiday Hard 6/13 +1.5
Grant 6/12 -0.7
Clingan 2/10 -6.8
Camara Hard 3/8 -0.9
Henderson Hard 0/7 -6.6
Sharpe Hard 3/6 +1.1
Williams III Open 2/4 -1.6
Murray Open 2/3 +0.1
Cissoko 0/3 -3.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
POR
43/87 Field Goals 32/80
49.4% Field Goal % 40.0%
14/33 3-Pointers 10/31
42.4% 3-Point % 32.3%
14/17 Free Throws 19/23
82.4% Free Throw % 82.6%
60.3% True Shooting % 51.6%
48 Total Rebounds 52
9 Offensive 7
31 Defensive 32
26 Assists 14
2.00 Assist/TO Ratio 0.78
12 Turnovers 18
12 Steals 6
10 Blocks 5
21 Fouls 20
52 Points in Paint 38
3 Fast Break Pts 17
29 Points off TOs 18
11 Second Chance Pts 13
24 Bench Points 34
21 Largest Lead 19
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Victor Wembanyama
27 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 34.3 MIN
+31.97
2
De'Aaron Fox
28 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 38.8 MIN
+24.7
3
Jerami Grant
17 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 32.9 MIN
+12.53
4
Deni Avdija
26 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 36.9 MIN
+11.86
5
Stephon Castle
16 PTS · 1 REB · 8 AST · 26.3 MIN
+10.36
6
Keldon Johnson
9 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 17.3 MIN
+9.69
7
Devin Vassell
11 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 34.9 MIN
+9.0
8
Shaedon Sharpe
8 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 12.7 MIN
+8.72
9
Robert Williams III
4 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 26.4 MIN
+8.0
10
Julian Champagnie
8 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 28.9 MIN
+7.92
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:05 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 114–93
Q4 0:29 J. McLaughlin STEAL (1 STL) 114–93
Q4 0:29 B. Wesley lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 114–93
Q4 0:35 J. McLaughlin 11' driving floating Jump Shot (2 PTS) (C. Bryant 1 AST) 114–93
Q4 0:55 K. Murray driving Layup (4 PTS) 112–93
Q4 1:12 C. Bryant 24' 3PT (6 PTS) (J. McLaughlin 1 AST) 112–91
Q4 1:31 B. Wesley Free Throw 2 of 2 (1 PTS) 109–91
Q4 1:31 TEAM offensive REBOUND 109–90
Q4 1:31 MISS B. Wesley Free Throw 1 of 2 109–90
Q4 1:31 J. McLaughlin take personal FOUL (1 PF) (Wesley 2 FT) 109–90
Q4 1:31 V. Wembanyama Free Throw 2 of 2 (27 PTS) 109–90
Q4 1:31 V. Wembanyama Free Throw 1 of 2 (26 PTS) 108–90
Q4 1:31 D. Avdija shooting personal FOUL (6 PF) (Wembanyama 2 FT) 107–90
Q4 1:40 V. Wembanyama REBOUND (Off:1 Def:11) 107–90
Q4 1:42 V. Wembanyama BLOCK (7 BLK) 107–90

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 37.0m
20
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.1

Holiday scored effectively (3-of-6 from deep) but completely sabotaged his +5.1 offensive credit with disastrous decision-making. His 6 turnovers (↓ his 3.3 average) repeatedly killed possessions and fueled the opposition's transition game.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 63.9%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -35.2
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -14.2
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S Deni Avdija 36.9m
26
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.5

Avdija leveraged aggressive downhill attacks to draw fouls (8-of-9 FT) and score efficiently (8-of-14 FG), driving a robust +14.4 offensive credit. However, his high-usage role came with severe sloppiness, as 5 turnovers (↓ his 3.7 average) and 6 fouls ultimately fouled him out of the game.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 72.4%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -20.5
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +20.9
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +2.1
Defense -5.7
Turnovers -12.6
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Toumani Camara 31.5m
8
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.2

Camara struggled to find his rhythm offensively, managing just 8 points (↓ his 14.7 average) on 38% shooting. He salvaged his night through relentless defensive effort, utilizing 10 contested shots to build a massive +8.4 defense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -23.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scoot Henderson 27.1m
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-15.0

Henderson was an absolute offensive liability, missing all 7 of his shot attempts to post a devastating -6.7 offensive credit. His 27 minutes were defined by empty possessions and zero points (↓↓ his 15.7 average), rendering him a massive detriment to the lineup.

Shooting
FG 0/7 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring -5.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Donovan Clingan 14.2m
5
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.8

Clingan endured a catastrophic shooting performance, clanking his way to a 2-of-10 mark from the floor that dragged his offensive credit down to -0.8. He managed to provide some interior resistance with 7 contested shots, but his inability to finish heavily muted his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 2/10 (20.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg -44.7
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring -1.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +6.7
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -1.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Jerami Grant 32.9m
17
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.5

Grant operated as a highly efficient scoring valve, converting 50% of his looks and a perfect 4-of-4 at the stripe to anchor a +12.8 offensive credit. He supplemented his scoring with solid work on the glass (5 rebounds, ↑ average) to round out a productive two-way shift.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.8%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
4
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.7

Williams III was a disruptive interior force, utilizing 10 contested shots and 2 blocks (↑ average) to anchor a stout +5.5 defensive credit. Though his scoring volume was low, his perfect ball security (zero turnovers) and active screening kept the offense flowing smoothly.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg -0.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +6.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.5

Sharpe provided a clean, efficient spark off the bench, hitting half his shots to generate a +6.6 offensive credit. He played mistake-free basketball with zero turnovers (↑ average) and added a steal to bolster his defensive metrics.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +15.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.7m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Kris Murray 12.5m
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.6

Murray operated strictly on the margins during his 12 minutes, converting two interior looks to notch a +3.1 offensive credit. He failed to register a single assist, steal, or block, operating as a low-usage placeholder.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -31.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.5m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.8

Cissoko struggled badly to find the basket, missing all three of his attempts to drag his offensive credit down to -3.6. He managed to swipe a steal (↑ average) to boost his defensive metrics, but his offensive futility defined his brief stint.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -27.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.4m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

Krejčí logged a mere minute of garbage time, failing to record a single statistic. He was entirely invisible during his brief appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -91.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Wesley managed a single point at the free-throw line during his brief cameo, but coughed up a turnover (↓ average) to yield a -1.5 offensive credit. He offered zero peripheral stats during his 1-minute shift.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg -91.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Yang saw just over a minute of action, registering a single contested shot and nothing else. He was a complete non-factor offensively and defensively.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -91.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 38.8m
28
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+26.0

Fox carved up the defense with surgical precision, utilizing a scorching 65% shooting night to drive a stellar +20.7 offensive credit. His playmaking (7 assists, ↑ average) and surprising rim protection (2 blocks, ↑ average) showcased a fully engaged two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 11/17 (64.7%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.6%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +24.5
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +22.5
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +7.8
Hustle +4.7
Defense +3.0
Turnovers -5.9
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
S Devin Vassell 34.9m
11
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.1

Vassell generated solid value across the board, leaning on efficient shot-making (5-of-9 FG) to drive a +6.8 offensive credit. His engagement extended beyond scoring, as 3 deflections and a block (↑ his season average) helped secure a +3.5 defensive mark.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 13.9%
Net Rtg +18.9
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +4.7
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
27
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+26.2

Wembanyama was an absolute terror defensively, racking up 7 blocks and 4 steals (both ↑↑ his averages) to fuel a massive +21.4 defensive credit. He paired that rim protection with 15 contested shots and a steady diet of free throws (8-of-8 FT) to completely dictate the terms of engagement on both ends.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 31.6%
Net Rtg +37.2
+/- +28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +21.4
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +6.5
Defense +11.1
Turnovers -8.9
STL 4
BLK 7
TO 4
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.0

Champagnie operated as a low-usage spacer, converting efficiently from deep (2-of-4 3P) to post a +5.7 offensive credit. He didn't force the issue, logging zero turnovers (↑ his season average) while playing a clean, mistake-free role on the wing.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 9.0%
Net Rtg +36.1
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Stephon Castle 26.3m
16
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.7

Castle operated primarily as a perimeter facilitator, leveraging his 8 assists to generate a +12.4 offensive credit despite a dip in raw scoring (16 points, ↓ average). His ball security was excellent, committing just 1 turnover (↑ his 3.1 average) to keep the offense humming smoothly.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.4%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.3m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 25.0m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.4

Harper endured a brutal offensive deep freeze, managing just 3 points (↓ his 13.3 average) on 17% shooting to yield a meager +0.1 offensive credit. He tried to compensate with active hands, tallying 3 deflections and zero turnovers (↑ average), but his inability to score derailed his overall utility.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 21.8%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg +13.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.9

Johnson provided a highly efficient, low-volume spark off the bench, converting 3-of-5 from the floor to post a +8.3 offensive credit. He played entirely within the flow of the offense, committing zero turnovers (↑ average) during a disciplined 17-minute shift.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -13.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kornet 12.2m
2
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Kornet struggled mightily to finish inside (1-of-7 FG), heavily suppressing his offensive output. However, he salvaged his brief 12-minute stint by anchoring the glass (7 rebounds, ↑ average) and contesting 5 shots to post a +4.7 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 14.3%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -35.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring -2.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +7.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.3

Barnes was a near-invisible presence during his 10 minutes of action, attempting just two shots and grabbing a single rebound. His +3.2 offensive credit reflects a mistake-free stint with zero turnovers, but his overall passivity limited any real impact.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +35.5
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.3

Bryant maximized a brief 5-minute cameo by flashing excellent perimeter touch, draining 2-of-3 from deep to generate a +4.9 offensive credit. He offered little else statistically, but his quick scoring burst provided a necessary jolt.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.8m
Scoring +5.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.7

Waters was completely invisible during his 1-minute shift, failing to record a single stat or hustle play. He essentially operated as a placeholder at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +91.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

Plumlee saw just over a minute of floor time and did not register a single box-score or hustle metric. His appearance was purely ceremonial to close out the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Biyombo logged a fleeting 1-minute garbage-time appearance, failing to register a single box-score statistic. His lone contribution was a single contested shot, leaving him as a complete non-factor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +91.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.9

McLaughlin made the most of his 1-minute cameo, converting his only shot attempt and swiping a steal (↑ average). This brief flurry of activity yielded a +2.5 offensive credit before he returned to the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +91.7
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0