GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Deni Avdija 38.9m
18
pts
8
reb
9
ast
Impact
-7.7

Clanked his way through a brutal shooting performance, frequently settling for heavily contested floaters. While his playmaking vision was sharp, his inability to score at the rim allowed defenders to jump passing lanes. The offensive flow completely bogged down when he tried to create his own shot late in the clock.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 9/15 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -10.4
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Offense +4.6
Hustle +2.1
Defense +4.0
Raw total +10.7
Avg player in 38.9m -18.4
Impact -7.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Shaedon Sharpe 34.5m
25
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.8

A bizarre statistical profile where elite defensive metrics and high-volume scoring were completely neutralized by something off the stat sheet. He likely hemorrhaged value through catastrophic live-ball turnovers and poor transition defense. The sheer volume of his usage masked how much offensive efficiency he gave back with forced isolation plays.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 56.0%
USG% 37.0%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Offense +3.6
Hustle +2.5
Defense +11.0
Raw total +17.1
Avg player in 34.5m -16.3
Impact +0.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 8
S Donovan Clingan 33.5m
17
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.6

Anchored the paint with terrifying rim protection while showcasing unexpected range from beyond the arc. His massive screens freed up guards all night, and his soft touch around the basket punished mismatches. Completely dictated the terms of engagement whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.9%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +3.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense +20.1
Hustle +4.8
Defense +7.6
Raw total +32.5
Avg player in 33.5m -15.9
Impact +16.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 28
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 46.4%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
S Toumani Camara 29.4m
8
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-18.3

Completely lost his defensive assignments, resulting in a disastrous defensive impact that bled easy layups. His offensive possessions were marred by forced, out-of-rhythm jumpers that sparked opponent fast breaks. A nightmarish stint where he was consistently a step slow on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -4.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Offense -1.6
Hustle +0.8
Defense -3.5
Raw total -4.3
Avg player in 29.4m -14.0
Impact -18.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kris Murray 27.9m
5
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.0

Passive offensive positioning allowed his defender to freely roam and double-team primary ball handlers. Despite solid hustle metrics, his reluctance to let it fly from deep compressed the floor. He was frequently targeted on switches, bleeding points through subtle defensive breakdowns.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 6.2%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +3.9
Defense +1.2
Raw total +8.3
Avg player in 27.9m -13.3
Impact -5.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Sidy Cissoko 27.0m
16
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.1

Generated a ton of raw activity and drew fouls by relentlessly attacking the basket. However, his total inability to hit from the perimeter allowed the defense to pack the paint and dare him to shoot. A chaotic performance that perfectly balanced high-energy rim pressure with floor-shrinking misses.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 10/13 (76.9%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +5.7
Defense +1.5
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 27.0m -12.8
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Caleb Love 18.1m
5
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.8

Derailed the offensive rhythm with a series of ill-advised, contested jumpers early in the shot clock. Offered absolutely zero resistance on the perimeter, allowing straight-line drives that compromised the rim protectors. A highly damaging stint defined by poor decision-making and a lack of defensive engagement.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -2.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Offense +0.6
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.1
Raw total +0.7
Avg player in 18.1m -8.5
Impact -7.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.0

Provided a hyper-efficient vertical threat that forced the defense to collapse on his rolls to the rim. His flawless shooting execution maximized his limited touches and kept the offense humming. Played a disciplined, mistake-free brand of basketball that quietly tilted the math in his team's favor.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 103.1%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -21.2
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Offense +8.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.9
Raw total +9.8
Avg player in 14.4m -6.8
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Rayan Rupert 10.6m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.9

Looked overwhelmed by the speed of the game, consistently arriving late to defensive rotations. His offensive hesitancy ground the ball movement to a halt, leading to a pair of forced, late-clock misses. A jittery performance where his lack of assertiveness actively hurt the floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -0.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +1.1
Defense -0.3
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 10.6m -5.0
Impact -5.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Duop Reath 5.7m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.3

Looked completely out of sync during a brief stint, rushing his perimeter looks and failing to secure defensive rebounds. Opponents immediately attacked his lack of lateral quickness in pick-and-roll coverage. Failed to leverage his size, resulting in empty possessions on both ends.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -109.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.7m
Offense -0.9
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.1
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 5.7m -2.7
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
DET Detroit Pistons
S Tobias Harris 33.0m
12
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.3

Inefficient isolation attempts and forced jumpers dragged down his overall impact despite decent counting stats. The offense frequently stagnated when he held the ball, leading to low-quality shots late in the clock. His inability to stretch the floor from deep allowed the defense to pack the paint against drivers.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.3%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +24.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Offense +10.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.1
Raw total +12.3
Avg player in 33.0m -15.6
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Duncan Robinson 31.6m
15
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.9

A barrage of contested, early-clock perimeter misses severely hampered the team's offensive rhythm. While he showed surprising effort chasing loose balls, the sheer volume of wasted possessions outweighed his off-ball movement. Opponents successfully ran him off the line and forced him into uncomfortable rushed attempts.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 3/11 (27.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 45.1%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.6m
Offense +6.4
Hustle +4.2
Defense +2.5
Raw total +13.1
Avg player in 31.6m -15.0
Impact -1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Ausar Thompson 27.8m
18
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+14.5

Relentless activity on the glass and in passing lanes generated massive defensive value. His ability to convert high-percentage looks inside without forcing bad shots kept his efficiency pristine. A dominant physical presence whose constant motor overwhelmed opponents in transition.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 26.8%
Net Rtg +24.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Offense +13.9
Hustle +5.3
Defense +8.5
Raw total +27.7
Avg player in 27.8m -13.2
Impact +14.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cade Cunningham 25.9m
14
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
-2.1

Careless ball security heavily penalized his playmaking, as his negative overall impact sharply contrasts with his highly efficient shooting. Live-ball turnovers and defensive miscommunications surrendered easy transition points that erased his offensive creation. A frustrating outing where his brilliant passing flashes were undone by sloppy execution.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Offense +7.1
Hustle +2.3
Defense +0.8
Raw total +10.2
Avg player in 25.9m -12.3
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jalen Duren 23.6m
26
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+27.3

Completely owned the interior with a phenomenal display of rim-running and putbacks. His elite shot selection and finishing maximized offensive possessions, while his sheer size deterred countless drives on the other end. A masterclass in knowing his role and executing it with devastating efficiency.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 73.7%
USG% 27.9%
Net Rtg +36.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +30.9
Hustle +2.0
Defense +5.5
Raw total +38.4
Avg player in 23.6m -11.1
Impact +27.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
6
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.1

Made up for a clunky shooting night by being an absolute menace in the hustle categories. His timely deflections and offensive rebounding created critical second-chance opportunities in tight windows. A quintessential glue-guy performance where raw energy masked offensive limitations.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.1%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -22.1
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Offense +4.0
Hustle +4.7
Defense +4.7
Raw total +13.4
Avg player in 23.6m -11.3
Impact +2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Set bone-crushing screens and provided excellent weak-side rim protection to salvage a quiet offensive night. His willingness to do the dirty work kept possessions alive and anchored the defensive shell. Proved that low-usage bigs can still swing the math through sheer physicality and positioning.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 7.8%
Net Rtg -34.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.6m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +3.0
Defense +4.4
Raw total +10.9
Avg player in 20.6m -9.7
Impact +1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
Jaden Ivey 18.0m
11
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.0

Provided a massive spark with decisive, downhill drives that collapsed the defense. His point-of-attack pressure disrupted the opponent's offensive flow, translating directly to a strong defensive impact. Played within himself, avoiding the wild turnovers that sometimes plague his game.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -5.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Offense +9.3
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.5
Raw total +15.4
Avg player in 18.0m -8.4
Impact +7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Caris LeVert 18.0m
0
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.6

An absolute black hole offensively, short-circuiting possessions with forced drives and bricking every shot he took. His solid defensive effort couldn't compensate for the massive gravity he lost on the other end. The opponent completely sagged off him, effectively blowing up Detroit's spacing whenever he touched the ball.

Shooting
FG 0/8 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +30.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Offense -4.5
Hustle +1.7
Defense +4.8
Raw total +2.0
Avg player in 18.0m -8.6
Impact -6.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.6

Struggled to navigate ball screens defensively, consistently putting the backline in rotation. His shot selection leaned too heavily on contested mid-range pull-ups, stalling out the second unit's momentum. Lacked the physical presence to generate any meaningful hustle plays to offset his shooting woes.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg -30.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Offense +3.9
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.9
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 13.8m -6.6
Impact -3.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Paul Reed 4.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

Barely broke a sweat during a brief cameo that yielded virtually zero statistical footprint. Failed to establish deep post position or contest shots effectively in his limited run. A complete non-factor whose minutes were essentially empty calories.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +30.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.6
Raw total +0.6
Avg player in 4.1m -2.0
Impact -1.4
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0