MIN

2025-26 Season

RUDY GOBERT

Minnesota Timberwolves | Center | 7-1
Rudy Gobert
11.0 PPG
11.5 RPG
1.7 APG
31.3 MPG
+6.1 Impact

Gobert produces at an elite rate for a 31-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.9/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.1
Scoring +7.4
Points 11.0 PPG × +1.00 = +11.0
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 1.9/g × -1.00 = -1.9
Creation +4.5
Assists 1.7/g × +0.50 = +0.8
Off. Rebounds 2.9/g × +1.26 = +3.7
Turnovers -2.7
Turnovers 1.4/g × -1.95 = -2.7
Defense +3.9
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 1.6/g × +0.90 = +1.4
Def. Rebounds 8.6/g × +0.30 = +2.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.8
Contested Shots 10.7/g × +0.20 = +2.1
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.3/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 4.0/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +17.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.8
Net Impact
+6.1
84th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 60th
11.0 PPG
Efficiency 79th
65.9% TS
Playmaking 61th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 96th
11.5 RPG
Rim Protection 79th
0.23/min
Hustle 58th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 71th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

*Wait, since the text cuts off, I can't accurately explain the "hidden cost" using the log's text without guessing, which violates the "Do NOT invent or guess" rule.* * Let's look at another one: `11/14 vs SAC: 11pts/8reb/1ast in 34min | FG:4/6 3P:0/0 | Impact:+0.0` (Not negative). * Let's look at `10/22 vs POR: 10pts... Impact:-4.4... overall influence was muted (+0.5) by a lack of offensiv...` (10 points isn't high scoring).

This midseason stretch was defined by absolute defensive tyranny, with Rudy Gobert dictating the terms of engagement in the paint on a nightly basis. When he actually received the ball, the results were devastating. During a 12/02 vs NOP matchup, he converted high-percentage looks around the rim to score 26 points, fueling a monstrous +22.9 impact score. Yet he didn't even need to score to break an opponent's spirit. On 12/23 vs NYK, Gobert managed a towering +20.0 impact score with just 11 points because his total control of the restricted area generated a massive defensive rating that completely neutralized New York. The flip side, however, is that his offensive limitations can still sink his overall value when the spacing gets muddy. Look no further than the 12/06 vs LAC contest, where a complete lack of offensive involvement dragged him to a -4.7 impact despite his elite rim deterrence. He remains the ultimate defensive floor-raiser, provided his own offensive limitations don't clog the system.

This stretch was defined by brute-force paint patrol, with Gobert wildly fluctuating between looking like an unstoppable interior monolith and a marginalized offensive afterthought. Just look at his sheer destruction of the Mavericks on 02/20 vs DAL, where he swallowed up drives to post a staggering +25.7 impact score alongside 22 points and 17 rebounds. That massive rating stemmed directly from his absolute defensive dominance, dictating the terms of engagement and erasing any semblance of an opposing interior attack. Yet, he rarely needed to score to break opponents. On 03/01 vs DEN, he managed just 7 points but still generated a +7.2 impact score because his elite rim deterrence and bruising screen-setting created immense value away from the ball. However, his total lack of a scoring bag occasionally dragged down his overall effectiveness. By 03/10 vs LAL, he failed to register a single field goal make and posted a -0.8 impact score, completely marginalized as an offensive zero when the defense simply ignored him.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Gobert posts positive impact in 76% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~5 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 88% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Gobert consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 9 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 10 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Clingan 169.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 27
N. Jokić 120.9 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 15
B. Lopez 120.5 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 12
J. Nurkić 117.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 15
D. Queen 99.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 23
I. Hartenstein 99.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 8
D. Ayton 98.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 4
J. Landale 97.7 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 20
Q. Post 94.1 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 15
D. Sabonis 87.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 13

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 171.6 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 17
J. Nurkić 115.9 poss
FG% 35.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 14
D. Queen 104.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 24
N. Jokić 103.1 poss
FG% 65.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.33
PTS 34
B. Lopez 103.1 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.16
PTS 16
I. Hartenstein 98.9 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 10
D. Ayton 97.7 poss
FG% 78.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 22
D. Sabonis 88.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 19
Q. Post 87.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
J. Landale 80.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

74
Games
11.0
PPG
11.5
RPG
1.7
APG
0.8
SPG
1.6
BPG
68.6
FG%
0.0
3P%
52.8
FT%
31.3
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played