January 18, 2026
EXPLORE THE GAME
Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.
LAL
2P —
3P —
POR
2P —
3P —
LAL
POR
LAL
PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Portland Trail Blazers
Sliced through the defense with an aggressive, downhill attacking style that yielded high-quality looks all night. His ability to consistently beat his primary defender forced rotations and scrambled the opponent's scheme. Added significant defensive value (+4.2) by staying attached to shooters and blowing up perimeter actions.
Generated massive value through relentless energy, posting an elite hustle score (+6.8) by constantly winning 50/50 balls. His willingness to do the dirty work in the trenches kept offensive possessions alive and wore down the opposing frontcourt. Efficient finishing inside further cemented a highly productive two-way performance.
Anchored the paint with an imposing defensive presence (+5.1) that completely deterred drives to the rim. While his insistence on taking perimeter jumpers dragged down his offensive efficiency, his sheer size created massive matchup problems inside. The defensive rim protection ultimately outweighed the wasted possessions from deep.
High-motor activity and solid perimeter shooting were largely offset by likely rotational mistakes or foul trouble that kept his net impact near zero. He excelled at creating second-chance opportunities (+4.6 hustle), but gave value back during disorganized transition sequences. The performance was a mixed bag of great effort and erratic execution.
Uncharacteristic struggles from the perimeter allowed defenders to go under screens, bogging down the half-court offense. While his point-of-attack defense remained stout (+2.4), the missed jumpers frequently triggered opponent fast breaks. The negative impact score reflects how his offensive stagnation disrupted the team's overall rhythm.
Paired dynamic perimeter shot-making with highly disruptive on-ball defense (+5.8) to swing momentum during key stretches. However, his net impact was muted, likely due to high-risk gambles or live-ball turnovers that gave opponents easy counter-punches. The aggressive style yielded brilliant highlights but came with a noticeable volatility tax.
Punished isolation matchups by aggressively hunting his spots and converting efficiently from all three levels. His decisive shot selection minimized empty possessions and kept the offense humming smoothly. This steady, high-level scoring gravity forced double teams and opened up the floor for the rest of the unit.
A masterclass in perimeter defense (+8.3) was completely undone by an absolute void of offensive production. Opponents entirely ignored him on the perimeter, using his defender as a free safety to blow up primary actions. The severe negative impact highlights how his offensive spacing issues crippled the team's half-court execution.
Operated as an elite vertical threat, collapsing the defense with hard rolls to the rim. His presence as a lob target fundamentally altered the opponent's weak-side rotations, creating space for shooters. Clean, mistake-free execution in the paint drove a highly efficient and impactful stint.
Provided sturdy backup minutes by executing defensive assignments without fouling and securing the glass. He didn't force the issue offensively, taking only what the defense conceded to maintain a positive flow. This low-mistake, fundamentally sound approach kept the team in the plus during his rotation.
Bleeding points during a very brief cameo, his inability to rotate effectively in space left the defense highly vulnerable. The unit was outpaced rapidly as opponents targeted him in pick-and-roll coverage. A complete lack of statistical production compounded the defensive breakdowns.
Made a brief but positive defensive impact during his single minute of garbage-time action. Stayed disciplined on his assignments to ensure the opponent couldn't generate a late scoring run.
Los Angeles Lakers
Excellent defensive metrics (+5.4) were completely negated by inefficient shot selection and likely live-ball turnovers. Settling for heavily contested perimeter looks capped his offensive ceiling and fueled transition opportunities for Portland. His overall impact flatlined at exactly neutral despite the high usage.
High-energy hustle plays (+4.0) and solid defensive rotations couldn't salvage a deeply negative overall impact. His complete lack of offensive gravity allowed defenders to sag off and clog the paint for teammates. This passive offensive approach ultimately stalled out the second-unit offense whenever he was on the floor.
Relentless hustle metrics (+4.4) and blistering perimeter efficiency drove a highly positive stint. He completely shifted the momentum by punishing drop coverage with decisive pull-up jumpers. The combination of loose-ball recoveries and elite shot-making made him a massive net positive.
A disastrous offensive stint was defined by forced, out-of-rhythm jumpers that consistently short-circuited possessions. His inability to penetrate the defense or create separation resulted in empty trips and easy run-outs for the opponent. The massive negative impact score reflects how much his poor shot selection actively harmed the team's spacing.
Anchored the frontcourt with highly efficient floor-spacing and disciplined defensive positioning. His ability to draw opposing bigs out of the paint opened up crucial driving lanes for the guards. Maximized his touches by taking only high-quality looks within the flow of the offense, driving a stellar positive impact.
Completely dismantled the interior defense with elite footwork and highly efficient finishing around the basket. His surprising perimeter touch forced opposing bigs to step out, fundamentally breaking Portland's defensive shell. Added significant value through timely hustle plays (+3.2) that kept possessions alive and generated extra scoring chances.
Poor shot selection from beyond the arc acted as a drag on an otherwise active two-way performance. He settled for contested perimeter looks early in the shot clock, effectively handing away transition opportunities. Those wasted offensive trips ultimately overshadowed his solid defensive positioning and hustle.
Capitalized on mismatches in the mid-post, using his size to generate high-percentage looks without forcing the issue. Strong weak-side defensive rotations (+4.9) prevented easy layups and stabilized the frontcourt. His disciplined shot profile and two-way execution steadily compounded into a highly positive impact.
Despite converting all his attempts at the rim, his lack of spacing gravity allowed defenders to heavily pack the paint. The negative overall impact suggests his offensive limitations disrupted the half-court flow more than his energy plays helped. Opponents actively ignored him on the perimeter, bogging down the primary actions.
Defensive lapses at the point of attack allowed opposing guards to easily break the paint and collapse the defense. While he knocked down the few open looks he received, his inability to contain dribble penetration proved costly. The negative overall score stems directly from being targeted on the perimeter during his brief rotation minutes.
Struggled to find the rhythm of the game during a brief stint, rushing his perimeter attempts and stalling offensive sets. While he showed flashes of capable point-of-attack defense (+1.1), offensive hesitancy derailed the secondary unit's momentum. The negative score reflects empty offensive possessions and a failure to bend the defense.
Provided an instant spark in limited action by decisively attacking closeouts and converting his looks. His immediate floor-spacing gravity forced the defense to stretch, opening up the middle for a brief stretch. Maximized a tiny window of playing time with flawless shot execution.
