GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S Devin Vassell 34.2m
15
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.4

Despite decent perimeter volume, severe miss penalties inside the arc heavily penalized his scoring metrics and dragged his Total Impact down to -4.1. He generated a respectable Box score (+6.8) through his outside shooting, but hidden turnover costs erased that value. This clunky shooting performance highlights his ongoing struggle to find consistent offensive rhythm.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.2m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S De'Aaron Fox 34.1m
17
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
+14.3

Strong creation metrics drove a highly positive Box score (+16.4), allowing him to orchestrate the offense effectively. However, severe miss penalties and potential turnover costs shaved down his Total Impact (+5.3), reflecting some clunky decision-making in the half-court. He managed to overcome a spotty shooting night by leaning into his role as a gritty facilitator.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +3.4
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +4.4
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
35
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.7

A terrifying offensive avalanche fueled a massive Box score (+21.4), as he earned a massive shot-making bonus by torching the nets from beyond the arc. While his Total Impact (+11.6) was slightly muted by a lack of dominant rebounding (Hustle: +0.0) and potential turnover costs, his sheer scoring gravity dictated the entire flow of the game. Continuing his late-season eruption, he proved utterly unguardable when stepping out to the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 13/21 (61.9%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +27.7
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +7.4
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -10.2
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
S Stephon Castle 32.6m
17
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+6.5

Brutal miss penalties from a high-volume, low-efficiency shooting night completely erased his robust creation credit, dragging his Total Impact into the negative (-1.7). Although he generated strong Box metrics (+10.3) through his passing, his erratic shot selection sabotaged his overall value. This performance perfectly illustrated his chaotic duality as a brilliant orchestrator who struggles with scoring discipline.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +8.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.4

Elite defensive metrics (+7.5) completely salvaged his low-volume offensive night, driving a positive Total Impact (+2.4). While he lacked creation volume, he earned a positive shot-making bonus on his few perimeter looks to maintain his spacing gravity. Operating as a quintessential three-and-D wing, his ability to blow up actions on the perimeter proved far more valuable than his scoring output.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
Dylan Harper 23.2m
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.6

Severe miss penalties and a lack of consistent creation value heavily punished his Total Impact (-7.8). His inability to anchor the second unit's offense resulted in empty minutes, compounded by negative defensive metrics (-0.6) on the other end. This frustrating outing highlighted his violent pendulum swings between explosive spark plug and complete rotational non-factor.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -5.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

A severe lack of shot-making value tanked his scoring metrics, resulting in a dismal Total Impact (-4.2) despite decent defensive contributions (+2.0). He failed to generate his usual downhill creation, floating on the perimeter and completely abandoning his identity as a high-energy wrecking ball. This passive, low-volume outing rendered him an offensive liability off the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -3.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Luke Kornet 14.3m
10
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.2

A massive shot-making bonus from hyper-efficient interior finishing and stout rim protection (+3.5 Defense) fueled a stellar Total Impact (+10.7). He maximized his short stint by avoiding turnover penalties, generating massive Box value (+12.2) without forcing bad shots. This highly productive cameo perfectly showcased his utility as a reliable, low-maintenance spot starter.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.7
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

A complete lack of shot-making or creation value rendered him a total ghost on the floor, dragging his Total Impact down to -2.0. He failed to connect on a single field goal and provided zero hustle credit, floating aimlessly through his rotation minutes. This passive outing perfectly encapsulates his late-season struggles to generate any rhythm off the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.3

Logging empty minutes without generating any scoring or creation credit completely zeroed out his offensive value, while poor defensive metrics (-1.6) pushed his Total Impact into the red (-3.2). He drifted into the background during his brief cameo, failing to record a single hustle play. This invisible performance underscores his frustrating inability to anchor the second unit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Relegated to a fleeting 53-second garbage-time appearance, he had absolutely no opportunity to generate any hustle or defensive credit. His completely blank statistical profile resulted in a negligible Total Impact (-0.3). He remains anchored to the deep bench, operating strictly as a glorified spectator.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

A meaningless under-a-minute cameo yielded zero creation or shot-making value, reflecting his ongoing irrelevance at the end of the rotation. He failed to generate any spacing gravity, resulting in a flat Total Impact (-0.3). This brief appearance highlights a veteran whose tank appears to be finally running on empty.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Stranded at the absolute end of the bench, he logged less than a minute of floor time without recording any shot-making or defensive credit. The lack of any offensive engagement resulted in a negligible Total Impact (-0.3). He continues to fight irrelevance, struggling to find any rhythm during these sparse, low-leverage minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Deni Avdija 39.5m
30
pts
10
reb
5
ast
Impact
+21.7

Avdija's massive Box score (+21.9) was driven by elite creation and scoring volume, but severe turnover penalties dragged his Total Impact down to +12.3. He dictated the half-court pace as a high-usage offensive hub, though his aggressive decision-making came with hidden costs. His solid defensive metrics (+4.4) provided a crucial secondary boost to keep his team afloat.

Shooting
FG 12/21 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +22.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +4.9
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jrue Holiday 35.6m
9
pts
4
reb
11
ast
Impact
-3.1

Brutal miss penalties from an ice-cold perimeter performance completely obliterated his creation credit, resulting in a steep negative Total Impact (-6.0). Although he generated decent Box metrics (+5.9) through his facilitation, clanking heavily from deep destroyed his offensive efficiency. This volatile showing highlighted his late-season tendency to swing wildly between explosive peaks and brutal shooting valleys.

Shooting
FG 4/15 (26.7%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Toumani Camara 31.9m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.4

A stark drop in shot-making efficiency completely tanked his overall value, resulting in a dismal Total Impact (-4.9). While his defensive metrics (+4.3) showed he remained engaged on the perimeter, severe miss penalties erased any positive contributions. This passive offensive showing snapped a recent hot streak and relegated him to a mere decoy.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -3.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scoot Henderson 27.1m
18
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.0

Despite generating strong creation and scoring metrics that drove a positive Box score (+10.8), hidden turnover costs nearly zeroed out his overall value (Total: +1.4). His lack of defensive resistance (+0.2) further undercut his offensive rhythm. He capitalized on open looks to maintain his recent hot streak, but his inability to manage the game's margins limited his true effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +15.3
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -5.9
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 21.7m
4
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.6

Severe miss penalties from a clunky perimeter shooting night plunged his Total Impact into the red (-6.5). He failed to generate his usual value on the glass (Hustle: +0.0), removing the primary safety net that usually masks his offensive limitations. Without his typical interior dominance, his erratic shot selection became a glaring liability.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +0.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.8

Erratic shot selection and severe miss penalties heavily dragged down his scoring efficiency, pushing his Total Impact into the red (-1.9). He managed to scrape together some defensive value (+1.9), but his lack of offensive discipline stalled the team's momentum. Continuing a brutal late-season shooting slump, his inability to convert difficult looks completely neutralized his raw athleticism.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.3

Operating as a complete offensive non-factor dragged his Total Impact (-2.9) into the negative despite solid rotational defense (+2.8). He failed to generate any meaningful creation or shot-making value, floating invisibly while the offense stalled. His inability to punish closeouts continues to neutralize his defensive utility, turning his minutes into a net negative.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jerami Grant 19.2m
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.4

A completely invisible offensive showing (-2.2 Box) cratered his overall value, as he failed to register any creation or hustle credit. While his defensive metrics (+3.9) suggest he was engaged on the perimeter, his inability to generate any scoring gravity resulted in a dismal Total Impact (-5.2). This passive outing perfectly illustrates his maddening tendency to drift through games as a total passenger.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.2m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+8.8

A massive shot-making bonus from high-percentage interior looks and crisp connective passing fueled a huge Box score (+15.0), cementing his status as a devastating bench enforcer. He maximized his short stint by avoiding turnover penalties, driving a highly positive Total Impact (+10.1) without forcing the issue. This hyper-efficient offensive burst perfectly encapsulated his value as a low-maintenance, high-yield weapon.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +6.7
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.8

A fleeting, empty cameo at the end of the rotation offered absolutely zero creation or shot-making value, resulting in a slightly negative Total Impact (-0.8). He drifted invisibly through his two minutes of floor time without recording a single hustle play. This passive appearance perfectly encapsulates his late-season fade into complete offensive irrelevance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Relegated to a mere 53 seconds of garbage time, he had no opportunity to generate any scoring or creation credit. His completely blank statistical profile yielded a negligible Total Impact (-0.3). This fleeting appearance underscores his ongoing struggle to carve out a meaningful role at the absolute fringes of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Marooned at the end of the bench, he logged under a minute of floor time and failed to register any hustle or defensive value. The lack of any offensive engagement resulted in a flat Total Impact (-0.3). He remains trapped in a brutal fight for survival during these sparse, low-leverage cameos.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Managing to incur a miss penalty during less than a minute of action immediately dropped his Total Impact to -0.9. He offered a tiny sliver of defensive resistance (+0.3), but his rushed perimeter attempt highlighted his ongoing offensive volatility. This brief, erratic stint perfectly mirrors his season-long struggle to find a reliable jump shot.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

A completely empty 53-second shift provided zero opportunity to generate any creation or scoring value. His blank stat line resulted in a negligible Total Impact (-0.3), reflecting his total lack of involvement. This brief cameo highlights his current status as a deep-bench spectator rather than a vital rotational spark plug.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.9m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0