IND

2025-26 Season

IVICA ZUBAC

Indiana Pacers | Center | 7-0
Ivica Zubac
14.1 PPG
10.6 RPG
2.2 APG
30.1 MPG
+4.4 Impact

Zubac produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.4
Scoring +10.1
Points 14.1 PPG × +1.00 = +14.1
Missed 2PT 4.0/g × -0.78 = -3.1
Missed 3PT 0.0/g × -0.87 = -0.0
Missed FT 0.9/g × -1.00 = -0.9
Creation +4.5
Assists 2.2/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 2.7/g × +1.26 = +3.4
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +2.1
Steals 0.4/g × +2.30 = +0.9
Blocks 0.8/g × +0.90 = +0.7
Def. Rebounds 8.0/g × +0.30 = +2.4
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.7
Contested Shots 9.1/g × +0.20 = +1.8
Deflections 1.0/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +16.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.5
Net Impact
+4.4
67th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 79th
14.1 PPG
Efficiency 70th
62.4% TS
Playmaking 74th
2.2 APG
Rebounding 90th
10.6 RPG
Rim Protection 36th
0.17/min
Hustle 12th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 29th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ivica Zubac spent the first twenty games of the season imposing his sheer physical will on the interior, enjoying a massive breakout as an unstoppable paint bully. Look at his absolute destruction of the frontcourt on 11/23 vs CLE. He erupted for 33 points and 18 rebounds, generating a staggering +24.9 impact score by converting high-percentage looks and completely overwhelming his matchup inside. But playing bully ball leaves little margin for error, and clunky execution occasionally dragged him down. During a frustrating outing on 11/28 vs MEM, fumbled catches and blown interior finishes resulted in a -4.2 impact score, completely erasing the value of his 12 rebounds. He is at his best when he demands the ball deep in the restricted area, like his grueling 46-minute marathon on 11/14 vs DAL. By consistently sealing off defenders to score 27 points, he fueled a massive +9.4 impact swing. When his hands are reliable and his motor runs hot, Zubac is a devastatingly effective traditional big.

This stretch was defined by a volatile pendulum swing between bruising interior dominance and bizarre disappearing acts. When engaged, Zubac was an absolute terror. He established deep post position early in the shot clock on 01/07 vs NYK, dropping 22 points and 11 rebounds to generate a staggering +19.0 impact score. He replicated that brute force on 01/22 vs LAL, grabbing 19 boards and posting a +15.6 impact score through relentless rebounding that suffocated the opposition. Yet, maddening inconsistencies plagued his overall execution. On 01/09 vs BKN, a stark drop-off in offensive execution led to a miserable 1-for-5 shooting night and a dismal -7.9 impact score. Even when his finishing was reliable, hidden defensive costs occasionally tanked his value. During the 01/30 vs DEN matchup, he scored an efficient 13 points on 6-of-10 shooting, but severe struggles navigating pick-and-roll coverage dragged his impact down to a -3.0.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Zubac has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~6 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 76% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Zubac consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +5.3, second-half: +3.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 10 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Williams 121.6 poss
FG% 76.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 38
Z. Edey 80.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 4
B. Adebayo 73.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
N. Jokić 65.1 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 16
M. Robinson 60.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
K. Towns 59.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 16
J. Hayes 58.0 poss
FG% 61.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
M. Diabaté 57.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 55.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 14
C. Holmgren 52.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Williams 119.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 24
Z. Edey 90.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 7
B. Adebayo 70.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 32
M. Robinson 63.9 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
K. Towns 61.2 poss
FG% 45.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.44
PTS 27
N. Jokić 58.1 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 26
J. Hayes 57.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
O. Okongwu 51.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
A. Drummond 51.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Claxton 50.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

48
Games
14.1
PPG
10.6
RPG
2.2
APG
0.4
SPG
0.8
BPG
59.8
FG%
0.0
3P%
71.1
FT%
30.1
MPG

GAME LOG

48 games played