POR

2025-26 Season

KRIS MURRAY

Portland Trail Blazers | Forward | 6-8
Kris Murray
5.8 PPG
3.7 RPG
1.4 APG
23.6 MPG
-2.9 Impact

Murray produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.9
Scoring +3.2
Points 5.8 PPG × +1.00 = +5.8
Missed 2PT 1.1/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 1.6/g × -0.87 = -1.4
Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3
Creation +1.8
Assists 1.4/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +1.4
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.4/g × +0.90 = +0.4
Def. Rebounds 2.7/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Contested Shots 3.4/g × +0.20 = +0.7
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.3/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
-2.9
11th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
5.9 PPG
Efficiency 22th
51.8% TS
Playmaking 39th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 41th
3.7 RPG
Rim Protection 44th
0.13/min
Hustle 40th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 80th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Extreme offensive passivity and crippling hesitation defined Kris Murray's dreadful start to the 2025-26 season. He routinely floated around the perimeter as a non-factor, allowing defenders to completely ignore him and clog the paint. This glaring lack of aggression bottomed out on 11/14 vs HOU, where he generated a disastrous -10.0 impact score by failing to capitalize on open spot-up looks and bogging down the half-court offense. Even when his shots actually fell, hidden defensive costs kept his overall production in the red. On 10/31 vs DEN, Murray tallied 10 points but still posted a -0.2 impact because he routinely gave up an extra step to movement shooters by failing to navigate off-ball screens. Occasionally, he managed to salvage his minutes through sheer grit rather than scoring. On 11/16 vs DAL, he scored just 6 points but recorded a stellar +6.7 impact, anchoring his floor time with elite defensive positioning and relentless hustle plays. Unfortunately, those gritty flashes were far too rare for a forward who mostly operated as an offensive ghost.

A maddening stretch of offensive invisibility defined Kris Murray's midseason run, as he frequently floated through his minutes without leaving a footprint. During the 12/05 vs DET matchup, his absolute refusal to attack generated a dismal -8.9 impact score, with zero points and total passivity completely killing his floor value. Yet, he occasionally salvaged his standing through sheer grit when his jumper abandoned him. Look at the 01/02 vs NOP contest, where he managed just 6 points on a brutal 1-of-7 shooting from the field. Despite the cratered offensive output, he still posted a +5.6 impact score because he leaned heavily on a relentless defensive motor and hustle to generate non-scoring value. When he actually decided to hunt his own shot, the results were striking. He erupted for 16 points on 7-of-10 shooting during the 02/24 vs MIN game, capitalizing on open looks to earn a +5.5 impact mark. Unfortunately, those assertive flashes were rare anomalies buried in a sea of empty cardio sessions.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Below-average consistency. Murray is negative impact in 74% of games, with scoring moving ~4 points game-to-game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Murray consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -3.8, second-half: -2.1. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

In a rough stretch — 5 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Queen 37.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
S. Curry 32.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
J. Collins 30.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
C. White 29.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. O'Neale 29.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
A. Mitchell 28.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
K. Leonard 28.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
H. Barnes 27.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
J. Giddey 27.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Leonard 43.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
D. Queen 40.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. Williams 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
K. Murray 33.6 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
A. Mitchell 32.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
C. Johnson 29.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
T. Murphy III 29.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
K. Knueppel 27.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Thompson 27.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
C. Holmgren 27.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

53
Games
5.8
PPG
3.7
RPG
1.4
APG
0.9
SPG
0.4
BPG
45.7
FG%
26.5
3P%
70.6
FT%
23.6
MPG

GAME LOG

53 games played